It was just a question. No ill intent.i post the occasional article if its an update or if i think it might be of some interest. i comment occasionally. i dont comment often do to the volatility here. the tower hardware is old and doesnt work well with the board and internet. i have often tried to post and the tower crashes, restarts or shuts down.
Actually we didn't. The eastern part of the party did. The tool was not popular in the west, and his behaviour is exactly why.So, I am right then.
As long as O'Foole is leader of the Conservatives Trudeau will remain the king. LOL
Rona Ambrose would have won. Peter McKay would have won. Even Pierre Poilievre would have won but no, the cons chose O'Foole.
Most often it is the management that needs to be fired, not the quarterback.OK. . . first, I understand how your parties work academically, but I don't really feel it, ya dig? Our parties work differently.
That said, seems like a butt-whooping like the Tories took at the hands of Nice-Hair calls for a change. "Failure to meet objectives" and all that.
Of course, there's always the question when people are saying "Fire the quarterback!" which is "And replace him with whom, exactly?"