College Women: Stop Getting Drunk

[PoliticalNick]

No way! We like the double standard, it's just more proof of our superiority.

You are obviously an insecure little man. You need to feel superior to women so you rant on about how men are the superior gender but is exposes you as weak and insecure of your role.

Men are not superior neither are women, we are equal yet different.

 

[CDNBear]

You are obviously an insecure little man. You need to feel superior to women so you rant on about how men are the superior gender but is exposes you as weak and insecure of your role.

Men are not superior neither are women, we are equal yet different.

Why is it when I say stuff like that to you, you cry like a little girl, but it's OK for you to do to others?

Serious question.

 

[gerryh]

Canada and the world are full of social discrepancies, including those that are gender based. Nobody disputes that. We were trying to discuss a particular discrepancy when the thread was highjacked. The fact of inequities existing does not excuse the emotion-laden tactic used to highjack the thread. We should work to eliminate bias, not accentuate it.

The hijacker wrote:

… for a man to be copulated with when he is so drunk he doesn't know if he's saying yes or no, is immensely less likely, than for a woman to have the same thing happen.
​

There is no question that kind of sexual assault happens, but it is not the topic. The topic is a social discrepancy that effects men. The hijacker broke in with the suggestion that males were being insensitive to how a raped woman feels. That accusation was untrue. The feelings of raped women were not discussed. It was an emotion-laden, implicitly accusatory attack on the topic. How would feminists feel if, in a thread discussing raped women, a man burst in to accuse them of being insensitive to how a man felt when falsely accused?

The OP topic is whether men are subjected to a legal double standard when accused of a sexual offence against a woman - a social discrepancy. Aggressive feminism has high jacked the thread using the accusation that the discussion was insensitive to women's perception of rape. The accusation comes out of nowhere. It is an in-your-face attack against men talking about an aspect of sexual assault particular to men. No man expressed insensitivity towards raped women. It isn't the topic. Extreme feminism is trying to make it the topic. That is probably a perfect answer to the question of whether there is a misandrist double standard. Obviously there is a double standard - men are should not discuss rape without feminist supervision.

The feminist says she's not misandrist. So what – a meaningless denial. Lots of men whose comments are misogynist say the same thing. This woman obviously felt threatened because men tried to discuss a legal double standard in rape prosecutions, so she accused board men of being insensitive. The fact that they are not insensitive is established by how successful her tactic was. Gone is the issue about unfairness to men. The topic is now proper feminist perspective - how bad men are. The mere discussion of rape raised the implication of misogyny to the feminist. If that isn't misandrist, nothing is.

Look in the mirror, and you will see one of the hijackers. Here is what the original OP was about.

[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT][/COLOR]
In one awful high-profile case after another—the U.S. Naval Academy; Steubenville, Ohio; now the allegations in Maryville, Mo.—we read about a young woman, sometimes only a girl, who goes to a party and ends up being raped. As soon as the school year begins, so do reports of female students sexually assaulted by their male classmates. A common denominator in these cases is alcohol, often copious amounts, enough to render the young woman incapacitated. But a misplaced fear of blaming the victim has made it somehow unacceptable to warn inexperienced young women that when they get wasted, they are putting themselves in potential peril.
Sexual assault and drinking: Teach women the connection.

 

[tober]

Oh, and do not PM me behind the scenes, it's creepy.

Well well. Back to being rude again. A proper response to my asking if you were finished would have been to write the above back as a PM. Matter of fact there is a rule against disclosing PM's on the board. Hopefully a mod will address this issue with you.

 

[gerryh]

Well well. Back to being rude again. A proper response to my asking if you were finished would have been to write the above back as a PM. Matter of fact there is a rule against disclosing PM's on the board. Hopefully a mod will address this issuer with you.

There's also "rules" concerning unwanted harassment through PM's.

 

[CDNBear]

Well well. Back to being rude again. A proper response to my asking if you were finished would have been to write the above back as a PM. Matter of fact there is a rule against disclosing PM's on the board. Hopefully a mod will address this issuer with you.

There is a rule about disclosing PM in the open forum.

Which Karrie has not done.

Why am I not surprised you are unable to understand the most simplest of things.

 

[PoliticalNick]

Why is it when I say stuff like that to you, you cry like a little girl, but it's OK for you to do to others?

Serious question.

I don't cry at all. I laugh at you and your trolling. One day you will add something of substance to a discussion on here and I will die of shock. Til the day that happens you will be just like Angstom, a small, pathetic little man who is so insecure you have to troll an internet forum boasting of your superiority to bolster your self-image.

Not my fault I don't pay much attention to you anymore other than when I need a chuckle or feel a little compassionate for you and the prevalent needy demeanor of all your posts.

 

[karrie]

Well well. Back to being rude again. A proper response to my asking if you were finished would have been to write the above back as a PM. Matter of fact there is a rule against disclosing PM's on the board. Hopefully a mod will address this issue with you.

I never disclosed the contents of a PM on the board, so good luck. But, I'd be more than happy to let Loc go see how you politely ask if I'm finished, if that's what you need. Now what was your delay in responding. Not chickening out are you?

 

[PoliticalNick]

I never disclosed the contents of a PM on the board, so good luck. But, I'd be more than happy to let Loc go see how you politely ask if I'm finished, if that's what you need. Now what was your delay in responding. Not chickening out are you?

Think I might just duck & cover in the corner to watch how this is gonna play out. ;-)

 

[CDNBear]

I don't cry at all. I laugh at you and your trolling. One day you will add something of substance to a discussion on here and I will die of shock. Til the day that happens you will be just like Angstom, a small, pathetic little man who is so insecure you have to troll an internet forum boasting of your superiority to bolster your self-image.

Not my fault I don't pay much attention to you anymore other than when I need a chuckle or feel a little compassionate for you and the prevalent needy demeanor of all your posts.

Wow, I see you're still butt hurt and emotional about being made a fool of, and I'm sure my question didn't help. Who knew I rented so much room in your head, lol.

Anyways, thanks for proving my point, lol.

I never disclosed the contents of a PM on the board, so good luck. But, I'd be more than happy to let Loc go see how you politely ask if I'm finished, if that's what you need. Now what was your delay in responding. Not chickening out are you?

I love it when you get all Domme on us!!!

 

[karrie]

Well well. Back to being rude again.

BTW, after seeing this post, I found the next one which didn't dignify a response, calling me highjacker, feminist, and misandrist, repeatedly.

I'd suggest that if you don't want people to be rude, you might start exercising some discretion yourself.

I love it when you get all Domme on us!!!

Fer **** sake, stop making this about my gender!!! *stomps highheeled boot*

 

[CDNBear]

BTW, after seeing this post, I found the next one which didn't dignify a response, calling me highjacker, feminist, and misandrist, repeatedly.

I'd suggest that if you don't want people to be rude, you might start exercising some discretion yourself.

Ummm, ya, good luck with that.

Fer **** sake, stop making this about my gender!!! *stomps highheeled boot*

Errr, sorry ma'am, let me correct that...

I love it when you get all dominant with us.

Is that gender neutral enough?

lol

 

[gerryh]

I never disclosed the contents of a PM on the board, so good luck. But, I'd be more than happy to let Loc go see how you politely ask if I'm finished, if that's what you need. Now what was your delay in responding. Not chickening out are you?

I will lay odds that tober declines to having Loc look at that PM...... but if it is rude, the rules do allow you to forward it to the mods for their consideration. hee hee hee.

 

[karrie]

Ummm, ya, good luck with that.

Errr, sorry ma'am, let me correct that...

I love it when you get all dominant with us.

Is that gender neutral enough?

lol

Yes, now it sounds more like I could beat you even if I had hairy knuckles. Thank you Bear. lol.

I will lay odds that tober declines to having Loc look at that PM...... but if it is rude, the rules do allow you to forward it to the mods for their consideration. hee hee hee.

lol. That's not necessary, I said all I needed to say on the issue.

 

[gerryh]

Yes, now it sounds more like I could beat you even if I had hairy knuckles. Thank you Bear. lol.

Beat him? Beat him? I am sooooooooo leaving that one alone. lol

lol. That's not necessary, I said all I needed to say on the issue.

party pooper.

 

[DaSleeper]

General response to a friends request from.........Tuber;-)

Friend Request - YouTube

 

[tober]

I never disclosed the contents of a PM on the board, so good luck. But, I'd be more than happy to let Loc go see how you politely ask if I'm finished, if that's what you need. Now what was your delay in responding. Not chickening out are you?

Be my guest, oh sensitive one.

Delay?
A life off the Internet I s'pose.

 

[karrie]

Precisely my response when I came back from lunch to find your PM in my inbox. Life happens, so why on earth you felt the need to PM to 'politely see if I was done', is beyond me.

 

[gerryh]

Precisely my response when I came back from lunch to find your PM in my inbox. Life happens, so why on earth you felt the need to PM to 'politely see if I was done', is beyond me.

because he's a troll and wasn't getting the response he wanted from you quick enough.

 

[tober]

BTW, after seeing this post, I found the next one which didn't dignify a response, calling me highjacker, feminist, and misandrist, repeatedly.

I'd suggest that if you don't want people to be rude, you might start exercising some discretion yourself.

Nothing personal, just addressing the contents of your posts. If you didn't hijack the thread, you were not responding like a feminist and your emotional outburst was not misandrist, all you have to do is explain your position. I explained mine. I say you were doing all three things and I explained why I think so. Fairly relevant for the Internet. If meeting arguments with responses isn't what you're here for, what then? Strokes and attention? Referring to stamping your high heeled boots isn't an appropriate reply. Its a girly reply, sufficient to excite some younger posters but hardly up to an intelligent standard. If you want to be the board "girly" I suppose that's your choice, but you lose the point by default.

Precisely my response when I came back from lunch to find your PM in my inbox. Life happens, so why on earth you felt the need to PM to 'politely see if I was done', is beyond me.

Teasing. If you can't take a joke you shouldn't have joined, girly.