China to stop recognition of British passport that would allow Hong Kongers to come to U.K.

StevIslan

New Member
Feb 1, 2021
1
0
1
Chinese recognition of a British passport that will allow Hong Kongers to come to the UK. This is, of course, extreme news, as most Chinese people come to work news. Many people are now losing their jobs and will have nothing to pay taxes with. This turn of events does not suit me. People really don't understand their actions. First they will do it, and then they think. I can only show you one site that can help you with this problem and fix the situation. Personally, this site once helped me solve a problem with a passport. In principle, this is what they are doing.







_________________________________________
https://passportinfoguide.com/
 
Last edited:

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Joe Biden: ‘Made in China’
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113

E-petition​

Make Hong Kong a British Colony again​

Signed by 3,222 people so far

The Hong Kong people have made it very clear that they don't want the Chinese to rule over them. With an estimated 1 million anti-Chinese protesters protesting violently on the streets of Hong Kong on the 1st July which was the 22nd anniversary of the handover. During the protest the Hong Kong people put up the old British colonial flag of Hong Kong in the Hong Kong legislative building so it's pretty obvious the Hong Kong people have had enough of the tyrannical Chinese government. In a 2013 poll by a Hong Kong newspaper showed that 92 percent of readers who voted think Hong Kongers would prefer a return to British rule, as it was a poll conducted by a Hong Kong newspaper it's likely that well over 50% of the votes were done by Hong Kongers. Also, as anti-Chinese protests in Hong Kong have risen dramatically in the last few years it's likely that the percentage of Hong Kongers that want British rule has also increased dramatically since 2013.

Not only do the Hong Kong people dislike China but evidence suggests they also seem to want the British to rule them again. It wouldn't just be democratic to hand Hong Kong back to the British but it would also be extremely morally right in my view as the Chinese government has shown that they are willing to put people into prison camps to indoctrinate Chinese immigrants to think like the typical Chinese person, as well as harvesting people's personal data against their will and have threatened to send Hong Kongers to prison as well despite the 1984 Sino-British joint declaration. China is very powerful and they are still a Communist and an authoritarian country, if the UK doesn't act soon then I have no doubt China will annex Hong Kong before 2047.

 
  • Like
Reactions: taxslave

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
8,981
2,075
113
New Brunswick

E-petition​

Make Hong Kong a British Colony again​

Signed by 3,222 people so far

The Hong Kong people have made it very clear that they don't want the Chinese to rule over them. With an estimated 1 million anti-Chinese protesters protesting violently on the streets of Hong Kong on the 1st July which was the 22nd anniversary of the handover. During the protest the Hong Kong people put up the old British colonial flag of Hong Kong in the Hong Kong legislative building so it's pretty obvious the Hong Kong people have had enough of the tyrannical Chinese government. In a 2013 poll by a Hong Kong newspaper showed that 92 percent of readers who voted think Hong Kongers would prefer a return to British rule, as it was a poll conducted by a Hong Kong newspaper it's likely that well over 50% of the votes were done by Hong Kongers. Also, as anti-Chinese protests in Hong Kong have risen dramatically in the last few years it's likely that the percentage of Hong Kongers that want British rule has also increased dramatically since 2013.

Not only do the Hong Kong people dislike China but evidence suggests they also seem to want the British to rule them again. It wouldn't just be democratic to hand Hong Kong back to the British but it would also be extremely morally right in my view as the Chinese government has shown that they are willing to put people into prison camps to indoctrinate Chinese immigrants to think like the typical Chinese person, as well as harvesting people's personal data against their will and have threatened to send Hong Kongers to prison as well despite the 1984 Sino-British joint declaration. China is very powerful and they are still a Communist and an authoritarian country, if the UK doesn't act soon then I have no doubt China will annex Hong Kong before 2047.


Much as they might wish it, Hong Kong is fucked unless they start a real revolution and push the issue to a damned bloody end. Despite China breaking the agreement with the UK over the autonomy of Hong Kong, China has the backing and military force to ignore the UK. At best, they can put sanctions against China for breach of contract.

China has it, fair and square.

As an aside though, I truly hope the people of Hong Kong somehow DO get to leave China because fuck China.
 
  • Like
Reactions: taxslave

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
Funny Guy.. they would just send 30 million troops to occupy Hong Kong and you would be dead in the water. You have 82,000. They would eat your lunch

Absolute codswallop.

The British military is more powerful than the Chinese military. And Britain can just threaten to nuke China. China can't nuke Britain.
 

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
Absolute codswallop.

The British military is more powerful than the Chinese military. And Britain can just threaten to nuke China. China can't nuke Britain.

China will defeat the UK any place. On Chinese soil and outside. China military budget is nearly 3 times that of the UK, Considering that Chinese men-power is less costly, in practice it counts to much more.

China air force is by far superior to the British one in numbers and doesn’t fall short in the quality of equipment. It may be that the Chinese are less experienced pilots, but it doesn’t change too much with such big differences what more that unlike in movies, the main role of air force is to bomb, transport and gather intelligence - and less to engage in dog fights.

The Chinese have much more means to project power to long distances (which is one main defining criteria of super power) and their nuclear subs fleet is probably superior to the British one. Certainly in numbers and in size of projects the Chinese are having the edge. Few years ago the US navy was training in China sea, then out of no where Chinese nuclear sub surfaced in a distance of few hundred meters from an American air craft carrier, circumventing its massive security circle. Not much is known about Chinese nuclear subs, but it’s known that they are, like most of the weapon China produce (and it produce everything), are the cutting edge of technology, even if a bit less than what the US and the UK have. The Chinese navy is much bigger and more capable than the British one. Though the British navy is one of worlds biggest navies.

In terms of industry, China have much more means and capabilities for mass production. In WWII Germany fail to understand the industrial capabilities of the US, therefore declared war on it, ending with the German defeat. The Chinese military industry, much like its civilian one, manufacture everything. The worlds largest air transporter (we just learned about that few weeks ago), also it currently develop fifth-generation fighter air crafts ( Chengdu J-20). On the civilian side, the world used to see on the market products that were manufactured in China, but always the technology and design were Western and etc. Now we know Chinese firms that manufacture laptops, smartphones and etc. With Chinese design. It goes like that for all sides of industry with part is still to get out to the rest of the world.

The point is that they are in rapid developing process very. And even now they do many things the UK just can’t (like starting a project of developing fifth-generation aircraft).

In terms of science and technology, China is blooming. 1 in every 3 peer reviewed scientific papers published in international journals is carrying Chinese name or names. So even if the UK is more advanced in some technological areas, it’s not enough or close to enough to make such huge difference. What more, that we know the Chinese do have cutting edge original technologies. For instance, they dazzled American reconnaissance satellite using powerful laser beam from the ground. They also developed the first known anti aircraft carrier ground to sea missile, with a range of 1500 km.

In space, the Chinese have much more assets, and are the third country in the world to send men to space.

In cyber capabilities, China expenditure is huge, and they have huge capabilities, The Chinese also have huge computational capabilities and many super computers. We also know that few years ago the Chinese army did an experiment in which it pass something like 80% of worlds internet communication through its servers. Though I tend to think the UK is more capable in at least part of the important aspects involved, but again, the gap and the size of it are not enough to compensate on the huge disadvantage the UK have when it compared to super power like China. It’s like comparing a leopard to tiger.

In number of soldiers, there is no place to start to compare. So, no, the UK don’t stand a chance. The only balance in terms of military power to the UK, is the US (which currently have the edge). Not even Russia can stand against China.

In WWII the military of the UK played a minor role in defeating Germany, if we scale it in terms of physical power. US and Russia were the muscles behind the defeat of the Germans. The UK came up with brilliant intelligence operations and with ingenious intelligence gathering. This is the UK till today. If China open war on it, the US will have to help her, otherwise it stand no chance.

But a real extreme scenario should happen for China to attack western country. They are rational.

P.S.

Just want to add that in war games and war simulations done in the US by the US army strategic research branch, it’s always found that in case of war between the US and China, US wouldn’t be able to defeat China, not on its soil. The UK is nothing in compare to the US in terms of military power, military size, military technology and military budget. So it may give you a proportion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: taxslave

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
If the UK attacks on Chinese territory China would win due to massive numerical superiority in terms of troops and equipment which means they could win with pure attrition by overwhelming the small British expeditionary force that would initially seize some Chinese territory and the British troops would have no choice but to withdraw. If the confrontation was near Chinese territory such as in Vietnam or Nepal then China would also win but the UK would put up a very good fight and I am sure Australia would let the UK use it as a staging base to attack China which which would be useful because they could refuel their planes and ships their not to mention that if the UK was coming to the aid of a country like Vietnam (highly unlikely but still plausible) then China would have to fight both that country’s military and the UK military contingent.

If the skirmish was on neutral territory far away from both countries then the UK would almost definitely win as we have better logistic capabilities as well as a much better quality air force and navy as well as marine force and even our army is more efficient nor to mention other military units such as our paratroopers and special forces. Another thing that would help the UK is the fact that if they attacked China the UK’s territory is safe because it is surrounded by allies i.e. NATO and the EU.

If it was a naval skirmish then it would probably a 50/50 once the UK’s two new Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers come into service.

If China attacks the UK on British territory then the UK would win hands down because NATO will help and China wouldn’t even pose a threat as we have the US which could destroy China by itself nor to mention if the Chinese navy is sailing to the UK they have to get past pretty much most European NATO nations if they pass through the Mediterranean before they can even attack us and it is highly unlikely that they would sail along the whole of Africa as that would take way to long and all of NATO would have prepared impenetrable defences, meanwhile though if China is attacking Europe the US and Canada could launch a counter-attack and invade Chinese territory. If however we were by our self in the war then China would still lose it would just take longer but China would only be able to get a small force near the UK due to China only have a green water navy, their single aircraft carrier is an ex-Soviet made one which doesn’t have the range to travel to the UK also it cannot launch that many aircraft and a lot of China’s ships are still Soviet Era ships, although they do have a lot of modern frigates and destroyers but they have no allies near the UK who would let them refuel so they would have to withdraw when they ran out of fuel for their ships and also for their aircraft, China also doesn’t really want to being moving their best ships out of their territorial waters because that would leave them defenceless and vulnerable to the US etc. Realistically though China wouldn’t be able to land a single military force in the UK at best they could seize one of the British Overseas Territories such as Antarctic territory or the Falklands Islands or Gibraltar etc, however closer territories such as Jersey and Guernsey are safe because the UK is right next to it, territories close to the continental US such as Bermuda and the Cayman Islands are likely to be safe as well because it is likely that the US would oppose a large Chinese force heading in its direction as it is a threat to them.

In short on British territory China stands absolutely no chance and on Chinese territory the UK stands no chance but perhaps they could severe economic damage to China as they could bomb economic zones with a high importance for the Chinese economy with their long range bombers provided Chinese SAM turrets don’t shoot the bombers down. On neutral territory the UK most likely wins.


source

Britain can do something almost no other country, not even China, can do: send nuclear weapons around the world and target any country. All Britain has to do is point nukes at Peking , say it's taking back Hong Kong, and say to the Chinks: "Your move."
 

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
8,981
2,075
113
New Brunswick
Britain can do something almost no other country, not even China, can do: send nuclear weapons around the world and target any country. All Britain has to do is point nukes at Peking , say it's taking back Hong Kong, and say to the Chinks: "Your move."

Thus proving your total lack of the military standing of countries in the world and the fallacy of your "The UK rulz all!" belief.

The UK isn't the only country that has ICBM's with nuclear warhead capability, a simple google search would tell you that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: taxslave

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Well, bejing joe could do it too, but it would screw up his graft and hunter's under the table crack and under age porntube hoe parties...
;)
BTW, Britain did cancel china's propaganda TV network...( no, not the transvestites - the tee vee channel)

Ofcom bans Chinese State TV from British airwaves amid “propaganda” row​


We probably should do the same, but some people would miss Serryah.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
Thus proving your total lack of the military standing of countries in the world and the fallacy of your "The UK rulz all!" belief.

The UK isn't the only country that has ICBM's with nuclear warhead capability, a simple google search would tell you that.

Britain can send its nukes anywhere round the world in Royal Navy submarines.

China's nukes - and it may have less of them that Britain has - are launched on land. So China doesn't have the global nuclear capability that Britain has. And China's nukes are fairly short-range, so it's doubtful that any of them can reach Britain.

Britain can nuke any country. China can't.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Funny Guy.. they would just send 30 million troops to occupy Hong Kong and you would be dead in the water. You have 82,000. They would eat your lunch
But come on Boomer...maid in china... Sometimes their stuff doesn't quite cut the mustard. Especially their knives.
;)
Sometimes the mustard cuts their knives.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: taxslave and B00Mer

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
Of course, a country's military isn't judged on how powerful it is by the number of troops it has. If that were the case China, not the United States, would be the most powerful country in the world and the United States would only be number three, behind India.