China could change constitution to extend leadership beyond 2 terms to indefinitely

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
China could change constitution to pave way for Xi Jinping to serve beyond 2nd term

China's ruling Communist Party on Sunday set the stage for President Xi Jinping to stay in office indefinitely, with a proposal to remove a constitutional clause limiting presidential service to just two terms in office.

Xi, 64, is currently required by the country's constitution to step down as president after two five-year terms. Nearing the end of his first term, he will be formally elected to a second at the annual meeting of China's largely rubber-stamp parliament opening on March 5.

There is no limit on his tenure as the party and military chief, though a maximum 10-year term is the norm. He began his second term as head of the party and military in October at the end of a once-every-five-years party congress.

The announcement, carried by state news agency Xinhua, gave few details. It said the proposal had been made by the party's Central Committee, the largest of its elite ruling bodies. The proposal also covers the vice president position.

"The Communist Party of China Central Committee proposed to remove the expression that the President and Vice-President of the People's Republic of China 'shall serve no more than two consecutive terms' from the country's Constitution," Xinhua said.

No heir apparent being groomed

The Central Committee also proposed inserting "Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era" into the constitution, Xinhua said in a separate report, referring to Xi's guiding political thought that is already in the arguably more important Communist Party constitution.

Constitutional reform needs to be approved by parliament. That is stacked with members chosen for their loyalty to the party, meaning the reform will not be blocked.

There has been persistent speculation that Xi wants to stay on in office past the customary two five-year terms. One of his closest political allies, former top graft buster Wang Qishan, stepped down from the party's Standing Committee – the seven-man body that runs China - in October.

Wang, 69, had reached the age at which top officials tend to retire. But he has been chosen as a parliament delegate this year and is likely to become vice-president, sources with ties to the leadership and diplomats say.

The move is significant because if Wang does not retire, that could set a precedent for Xi to stay on in power after he completes the traditional two terms in office.

China could change constitution to pave way for Xi Jinping to serve beyond 2nd term - World - CBC News
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Putin did it. China is next. Trump will want to.

Maybe, he'll announce it during his missile parade.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
What the previous posters sound like.....


 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Yeah them darn trudies and bushies...and the ol queen of britain too..
;)
but what are tyrants supposed to do?

I see Mulroney has spawn in the game now too...
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Ah, the paranoia has set in I see.
;)
like the "Russians are coming", global warming, and the check is in the mail...

As for D Jr, He may not want the gig after seeing just what's involved with the criminal element who oppose his father.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Ah, the paranoia has set in I see.
;)
like the "Russians are coming", global warming, and the check is in the mail...

As for D Jr, He may not want the gig after seeing just what's involved with the criminal element who oppose his father.

No paranoia. It will be fun to watch Donald Junior crumble.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Hm.

I don't know if that's a good thing.

Until voters get tired of the same old sameold. That is one of the many benefits of a democracy, we decide how long our leaders stay not the party insiders.

That's a valid point.