Charlie Sheen's Statement to the London Guardian on 9-11

mabudon

Metal King
Mar 15, 2006
1,339
30
48
Golden Horseshoe, Ontario
RE: Charlie Sheen's State

I honestly believe that building 7 was detonated after it became clear that nothing else was going to happen to justify its collapse... if it were indeed "wired up" it simply HAD to come down so as to hide the evidence.. I have a pretty good link that I think this thread might actually need, I'll post it in a bit (damn dialup makes stuff difficult like that)
 

Johnny Utah

Council Member
Mar 11, 2006
1,434
1
38
The Front of Building WTC 7 took the brunt of the collapse of WTC1 and 2 when they fell. Larry Silverstein owner of WTC 7 told the FDNY to let it go because it wasn't worth trying to save after the massive loss of life that day.

There are a few stories that WTC 7 was built with major flaws which caused it to collapse, who knows that is possible but in now way was it blown up as part of some Conspiracy.

Those who believe WTC 7 was blown up as part of a Conspiracy must also believe WTC 1 and 2 were blown up with explosives carried into the Towers by the FDNY, that the planes were flown by remote control or 7,000 Jews never showed up for work at the WTC that day because 9/11 was a Mossad Op or a plane never hit the Pentagon. :roll:
 

Johnny Utah

Council Member
Mar 11, 2006
1,434
1
38
#juan said:
Rubbish!

There is more than enough room for intelligent questions about the complete collapse of bldg 7 from a few small fires.

http://tinyurl.com/e4axf
Rubbish nothing, it's just not the fires there's the seismic shock of WTC Towers collapsing which could have caused structural damage to WTC 7 because WTC 7 could have had structural flaws from the day it was built.

Keep believing the Conspiracy theories. :roll:
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
For those who can't read

bldg 6 was between the towers and bldg 7. Bldg 7 was over three hundred and fifty feet from the towers. Any debris had to fly over bldg 6 to hit bldg 7. We all saw the towers fall just about straight down. The few little fires in bldg 7 were unlikely to bring down the bldg.
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
There has been no official report issued on the collapse of WTC 7, it is due sometime early summer of this year by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Johnny Utah said:
#juan said:
Rubbish!

There is more than enough room for intelligent questions about the complete collapse of bldg 7 from a few small fires.

http://tinyurl.com/e4axf
Rubbish nothing, it's just not the fires there's the seismic shock of WTC Towers collapsing which could have caused structural damage to WTC 7 because WTC 7 could have had structural flaws from the day it was built.

Keep believing the Conspiracy theories. :roll:

The biggest conspiracy theroy is that there is no conspiracy.
 

Johnny Utah

Council Member
Mar 11, 2006
1,434
1
38
I think not said:
There has been no official report issued on the collapse of WTC 7, it is due sometime early summer of this year by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
I'm thinking they will find there were structural flaws in WTC 7 from the day it was built which contributed to it's collapse from the seismic shock of WTC 1 and 2 collapsing.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Re: RE: Charlie Sheen's State

darkbeaver said:
God herself couldn't convince you otherwise could she Jay.

And now you see why. God doesn't accept leftist lies as truth, nor should anyone else.


Not exactly smashing stereotypes of liberals as mincing pantywaists, the left's entire contribution to the war effort thus far has been to whine. -- Ann Coulter

She forgot to add "and make up lies so they can support the enemy".
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Building 7 was not hit by any aircraft, and apparently did not suffer massive damage from the violent destruction of either of the Twin Towers. Small fires were observed in a few different parts of the building prior to its "collapse." Most of the fires were barely visible, and were not hot enough to cause even window breakage, at least on the north side of the tower, of which there are photos shortly before the collapse. The largest observed fires were the ones visible on the southeast wall shown in the photograph.

Funny how a minor seismic event caused that bldg to do a very orderly collapse into it's own footprint.



 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
missile said:
That could have been the result of a lot of stolen passports..just to inject a dose of reality here.


You have a good point, but you cant steal faces from passeport, that is the point.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Re: RE: Charlie Sheen's Statement to the London Guardian on

Mogz said:
Hehe people are so funny. There always has to be some ulterior motive behind everything. People just can't accept the fact that nutters flew jumbo jets in to buildings and killed people. It had to be the CIA, or the Jews, or my personal favorite, the Free Masons. People cite these "facts" about planted demolitions, the fireman laying C4, etc etc, when in reality, none of you were there. You sat at home, just like I did, and watched planes fly in to buildings, which subsequently collapsed as a result. You claim these were timed detonations, however explain the other buildings that collapsed around the area as a result for the next day and a bit? Timed explosions there too? Some people just can't grasp reality I guess, and that's fine, living in a bubble does have its merits I suppose. Regardless I know what I saw. I saw a jumbo jet punch a hole through a building. Claim fire resistant steel al you want, I highly doubt that the architects said; "you know Ted, we should beef up these girders incase some fanatics fly a fuel laden jet in to this bad boy". I don't care what the heat resistance of the building was, the fact is that a jet rammed through all the major supports. Think of it like this, ever play jenga? The tower is solid at the start right? But remove more and more pieces and it gets weaker, eventually falling. The same applies for the towers. When a plane pucnhes through multiple floors of a building and removes numerous major supporting struts, the building cannot support the TONS of concrete and steel above it, hench the pancake effect that occured. I would just like to say for the record, you guys are funny, you honestly make me laugh. It's a good thing.


Nobody said the jews, nobody said the cia was involved, or even the free-mason, key member of the bush administrations are with many others, but we know for a fact that there is no way that 19 hijacker from alquada did it on bythemselves.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Dexter Sinister said:
<sigh> Here we go 'round again. Try a little logic and reason and expert opinion.


http://www.skepdic.com/refuge/bunk27.html

"Demolition experts spend weeks inside a derelict building planning an event. Many of the beams are cut through by about 90% so that the explosion only has to break a small bit of steel. In this state the building is highly dangerous, and there is no way such a prepared building could still be running day-to-day like WTC was."
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Re: RE: Charlie Sheen's State

Jay said:
darkbeaver said:
God herself couldn't convince you otherwise could she Jay.

And now you see why. God doesn't accept leftist lies as truth, nor should anyone else.


Not exactly smashing stereotypes of liberals as mincing pantywaists, the left's entire contribution to the war effort thus far has been to whine. -- Ann Coulter

She forgot to add "and make up lies so they can support the enemy".

And you forget to define the enemys, let me see oh yes the evildoers
hehehehehe evildoers heheheheheh evildoers hehehehehe boggy men hehehehehe the devil hehehehehe giant mutant lefty pantywaist rabbits carrying AK's and chasing our womenfolk up and down the streets hehehehehehe scocialists and commys hiding in your closet and lurking under your bed.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Johnny Utah said:
The Front of Building WTC 7 took the brunt of the collapse of WTC1 and 2 when they fell. Larry Silverstein owner of WTC 7 told the FDNY to let it go because it wasn't worth trying to save after the massive loss of life that day.

There are a few stories that WTC 7 was built with major flaws which caused it to collapse, who knows that is possible but in now way was it blown up as part of some Conspiracy.

Those who believe WTC 7 was blown up as part of a Conspiracy must also believe WTC 1 and 2 were blown up with explosives carried into the Towers by the FDNY, that the planes were flown by remote control or 7,000 Jews never showed up for work at the WTC that day because 9/11 was a Mossad Op or a plane never hit the Pentagon. :roll:


This is funny, cause the building right besides twin tower, didnt collapse, building 7 was 2 block away from the tower, so how do you explain that the tower that was just besides the twin tower didnt collapse??

I ll tell you why, they werent larrry sylverstein's
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Johnny Utah said:
I think not said:
There has been no official report issued on the collapse of WTC 7, it is due sometime early summer of this year by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
I'm thinking they will find there were structural flaws in WTC 7 from the day it was built which contributed to it's collapse from the seismic shock of WTC 1 and 2 collapsing.


Now watch this video, where you see larry sylverstein , explaining the reason why they destroyed with explosive building 7.

larry sylverstein


what ""pull it"" means
 

zoofer

Council Member
Dec 31, 2005
1,274
2
38
I confess. I did it on my lonesome. Actually I had help from the Mad Hatter Club of Boise Idaho. I was gonna let Charlie in on it but he didn't seem to be a common sense type of guy.
My confession should put all the conspiracy theories to rest but I doubt it. New Nutters are born every day.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
zoofer said:
I confess. I did it on my lonesome. Actually I had help from the Mad Hatter Club of Boise Idaho. I was gonna let Charlie in on it but he didn't seem to be a common sense type of guy.
My confession should put all the conspiracy theories to rest but a doubt it. New Nutters are born every day.


It depends how you see conspiracy theories, in that case,since there is evidence, it is not a theory anymore, it is a possibility, but in the case of 19 hijackers doing the event on themselves is the real conspiracy theories, since ther is no evidence showing they are behind it.