Most small businesses get stomped out due to massive wealth-sucking businesses though, don't they.
I don't know what you mean when you refer to lowest common denominators or what your definition of success is. I assume you believe wealth accumulation is success, and it is in a capitalist society. In a capitalist society it's basically the only determinant of success. The problem is you can't have a excessive accumulation of wealth without the detriment to other people. No success in capitalism comes without the stomping down of other people basically.
.No.Most small businesses get stomped out due to massive wealth-sucking businesses though, don't they.
Really? Somebody always gets stomped. Well that is rather jaded.
I don't know what you mean when you refer to lowest common denominators or what your definition of success is.
I assume you believe wealth accumulation is success, and it is in a capitalist society.
In a capitalist society it's basically the only determinant of success.
The problem is you can't have a excessive accumulation of wealth without the detriment to other people.
No success in capitalism comes without the stomping down of other people basically.
I reccomand you see this Video : ??????? ???? ( The New Colonialism)
The simple fact is that having a WalMart come to town hurts some small businesses and helps some small businesses. This has been extensively studied, and each set of true believers can quote studies that support their emotionally-driven conclusions, and completely ignore the equally valid studies that show the other side.You said most. The answer is no. Does Walmart put some out of business... yes of course.
I disagree. There are downsides for consumers as well. For example, if a store whose inventory overlaps that of WalMart goes out of business because of the competition, its customers lose both the availability of items they can get at WalMart and items they cannot get at WalMart.And for the consumer it's all benefit.
Standard of living is the easiest... Sadly, even in the collectivist societies, some form of currency (read: wealth) exists as the medium of trade
You assume wrong.
PS - wealth accumulation occurs every day in collective societies, you just prefer to believe that is not the case
Hardly... Maybe consider things like living conditions, life expectancy, standard of living etc.
Start with comparing N Korea to any Western nation
You're all hung up on wealth and further assume that it's an either/or situation, grinding poverty or unimaginable wealth.. The vast majority live comfortably between the 2
Same with communism, socialism and/or collectivism.
You're only fooling yourself if you believe otherwise
By God, you're right! Your single-product anecdote proves absolutely that WalMart is an unadulterated, pure, 100% benefit to all consumers, with no downside for anybody, ever!Let's see....pay $22 for a master lock padlock at mom and pop or "get stuck" with a Yale of identical quality for $9 at Walmart. My need for a padlock was met unless I had some "brand loyal" thing going.
Agreed. Nothing gets you mugged around this place like making a moderate statement that recognizes both sides of an issue.sigh
That's right. 1 of thousands of products. Go tell your dad they have head and shoulders for cheaper than gougemart, if you know who he is.By God, you're right! Your single-product anecdote proves absolutely that WalMart is an unadulterated, pure, 100% benefit to all consumers, with no downside for anybody, ever!
Go tell Mommy how clever you are, you bright boy, you.
Agreed. Nothing gets you mugged around this place like making a moderate statement that recognizes both sides of an issue.