Re: RE: Canadians Moving to t
bluealberta said:
I don't hate Canada. Alberta makes me very happy, people who think for themselves, have an independent quality. What I and a growing number of people are really getting tired of is being taken for granted, totally ignoring anything that is suggested, and branding us all as bigots, rednecks, you name it, any derogatory term you can think of. Whether you in the East like it or not, the economics of Canada are shifting west rapidly, and we would like som input into how this country is governed, You have no idea how frustrating it has been over the past forty years to know that virtually every federal election has been decided before we even get to vote. And decided by the Maritimes who have more ridings for less population than Alberta.
Hate, hardly, but frustrated and disappointed, abso-friggin-lutely.
As an easterner (and a Greater Torontonian on top of that) I must say that I like Alberta. Good folk live in Alberta, they're friendly, vibrant and have got character. If I had my way, I'd be moving to Calgary, prefereably to Prominence Point, I think that is the residential area on top the cliff that you see as you drive on Sarcee Trail.
Anyhow, Alberta is going through a boom time that was spurred on by the lucky discover of oil at Leduc #1. Their hardworking people have built up Alberta into one of the best and wealthiest political states in the world. Had their been no oil, I'm unsure what Alberta would be like today, but that is neither here nor there.
I can understand Alberta's frustration, and I believe it is more than just east west rivalry as a lot of Albertans are relocated easterners. Canada's economy is moving west, this is a fact. More and more businesses and money is going that way, however unless more and more of Canada's population goes with it, Alberta will always be in the shadows of Ontario and Quebec.
In terms of funding, sure Alberta contributes more per capita, but it really is total numbers that drive power. I'm not sure what the actual values are, but say Albertans give a dollar (1$) per person to the government and Ontarians give 25% less per person (0.75$). Ontario still gives more than 3 times as much money to Ottawa (and I doubt the difference per capita is that big).
Next is the whole thing about a federal elections being decided in the east even before Albertans cast their vote. You got two things against you, location and population. Nothing can change the fact that Eastern Canada is 2 hours ahead of you. We can either skew all the voting time so the polls open and close at the same time across the country or we can not release any results until every poll has closed.
As for number of seats, look at this:
Based on Canada 32,078,819 People and 308 seats
Prov. - Pop (2005) - % of Cdn - # of Seats - % Seats - % Diff
NL - 516,986 - 1.61 - 7 - 2.27 - 0.66
PE- 137,734 - 0.43 - 4 - 1.30 - 0.87
NB - 751,257 - 2.34 - 10 - 3.25 - 0.90
NS - 937,538 - 2.92 - 11 - 3.57 - 0.65
PQ - 7,568,640 - 23.59 - 75 - 24.35 - 0.76
ON - 12,449,502 - 38.81 - 106 - 34.42 - (-4.39)
MB - 1,174,645 - 3.66 - 14 - 4.55 - 0.88
SK - 995,280 - 3.10 - 14 - 4.55 - 1.44
AB - 3,223,415 - 10.05 - 28 - 9.09 - (-0.96)
BC - 4,219,968 - 13.15 - 36 - 11.69 - (-1.47)
YK - 31,227 - 0.10 - 1 - 0.32 - 0.23
NT - 42,944 - 0.13 - 1 - 0.32 - 0.19
NU - 29,683 - 0.09 - 1 - 0.32 - 0.23
So you can see that the Maritimes collectively only have 3.08% more representation than their population warrants. Any extra seats in the Maritimes is really coming out of Ontario's pocket so to speak. If Alberta really wants its extra say, they should look no further than Manitoba and for British Columbians, their missing representation is in Saskatchewan. So the west is really a wash. If anyone gets slightly more, it is the North, but they have to have atleast one seat each. But again, this comes out of Ontario's pocket.
If you really wanted to redistrubute seats along population proportions, then this is what would happen based on 308 seats.
NL - 5, PE - 1, NB - 7, NS- 9 (Atlantic = 22 seats)
Ontario = 119 seats
Quebec = 73 seats
MB - 11, SK - 10, AB - 31, BC - 41 (West = 93 seats)
North = 1 seat
So what would this accomplish? The west would have 1 extra seat, the North would share 1 seat collectively, Atlantic Canada would lose 10 seats, Quebec would lose 2 seats and lo and behold Ontario would pick up an extra 13 seats.
Looks like that would shift the balance of power further into Ontario's hands.
So the moral of the story is if you want more say, get more people! Until that happens, stop complaining about seat distribution, if any one is getting the shaft, it is Ontario!
The whole western shift is happening in the States too, but unlike Canada, the population is shifting as well. New York, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Ohio, etc are losing folk, whereas Arizona, California and Washington are gaining. Washington, D.C. listens to California cause it has over 30 million people, more than any other state. They don't listen as much to Oregon, cause they only have around 3 million.