Canada increases troops

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
Gerald24, your comments are entirely unwarranted; in no way whatsoever did #juan make "asshole" comments on this thread, nor has he on this Forum, to my knowledge — I find a sweet irony in the method in which you accused him of being an asshole.

I am no moderator, but allow my opinion to be made perfectly clear that if you see fit to be "over and out" with this site, then Canadian Content will be so much the better for having one less user who refuses to acknowledge the authority and the right of the Administration and the Moderators to do their job.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Re: RE: Canada increases troops

the caracal kid said:
dory,

one of perhaps the great deceptions played on the canadian populace comes through the media/mainstream euphemisms.

the populace is told soldiers are "peacekeepers", or "peacemakers", or some other term, along with (up until recently) a carefully controlled imagry of the forces. When the truth is revealed, it should be no surprise there is a backlash. The truth about the military and its operations are much less attractive than the "postcard" version used to sell it. Propaganda works wonders, so long as it is not undermined.

Absolutely!

That is why I like the new Chief, Hillier.

They're going into the hills to kill scumbags. Clear, unadulterated truth. Whether you like it or not.

BTW, you're avatara are begining to confuse me! (easily done, I admit) :)

I LIKE this one. 8)
 

Mogz

Council Member
Jan 26, 2006
1,254
1
38
Edmonton
RE: Canada increases troo

Well, wouldn't that be the Coffeshop Cadres of the nation propagating that view? From what I've seen, every soldier and officer, since we went of Afghanistan, have been saying we're at war. The ideas about peacekeeping come from the uninformed public, who prefer to believe that the Canadian Armed Forces ( sorry Canadian Forces.. we aren't armed anymore... Rolling Eyes ) are boy scouts and international traffic police.

Exactly Dory, for some reason people seem unwilling to come to terms with the fact we're at war. It's quite sad really.

Where is Hillier going to get these extra troops? A recent article I read stated that "It is taking two plus years just to do a security check on those that pass the recruitment stage". Would you wnat to put your life on hold for two plus years, I wouldn't. The Army and Reserves are going to be maxed out, our boys are doing tours that are to close to each other. I wonder what the devorce rate is for the Army. In a ideal world the Navy Personel would be trained to serve not just on a Frigate but with he Army as well, the same for our Air Force regardless of trade.


Well Sassy, recruitment is up a lot in the last few years. Sadly our process is backlogged as we're not used to dealing with so many recruits. The security screening crawls along because there aren't enough CSIS employees to screen everyone quickly. When I joined the Army I waited for almost a year. Granted things are much worse these days, but still, I waited because it was something I wanted to do. We're lucky in our Reservists though (as Dory pointed out the need to call them up). Currently 20% of the soldiers serving on Op Archer (Kandahar, Germany and Camp Mirage) are reservists. Our reg force people are burnt and sadly no relief is in sight. Currently my Regiment numbers less than 80 all ranks, a Regiment that usually numbers well over 550. The rest are in Afghanistan, Camp Mirage, or Germany support Op Archer. The sad part is, that in the fall of 2006 we're sending more troops to 'ghan. Where the Regiment is getting them, I have no idea.

Two young men who have a couple tours behind them turned in their resignations when asked to go back to Afganistan in the present situation.

Better off without them. I didn't join the Forces for a paycheck. If they did, we don't need them.
 

The Gunslinger

Electoral Member
May 12, 2005
169
0
16
Wetaskiwin, AB
Funny story. Decided to go to school and get a BA in history. Then you realize how utterly useless a BA is, and the military looks like an increasingly better option every day...
 

Doryman

Electoral Member
Nov 30, 2005
435
2
18
St. John's
Re: RE: Canada increases troops

the caracal kid said:
dory,

one of perhaps the great deceptions played on the canadian populace comes through the media/mainstream euphemisms.

the populace is told soldiers are "peacekeepers", or "peacemakers", or some other term, along with (up until recently) a carefully controlled imagry of the forces. When the truth is revealed, it should be no surprise there is a backlash. The truth about the military and its operations are much less attractive than the "postcard" version used to sell it. Propaganda works wonders, so long as it is not undermined.

That propaganda didn't stem from the military, Caracal, it was purely a Liberal agenda. Most soldiers don't want to be seen as ineffectual hall monitors by the very people they serve.

And the truth is rarely pretty. Would you rather be given attractive lies?
 

Curiosity

Senate Member
Jul 30, 2005
7,326
138
63
California
Doryman

You write: And the truth is rarely pretty. Would you rather be given attractive lies?

Well said!

We spend much of our lives searching for comfort, using disguise and denial....rather than getting it over with and facing up. I
can understand a group of people not wanting to prepare what to them seems unnecessary because they are innocents caught up in a huge problem by their geographical location as just one factor.

A country which dwells on peace is a beautiful thing, but there must be a defense to ensure that peace is kept.

Place blame whenever or wherever you wish, but continue keeping the military at the ready.
 

cyberclark

Electoral Member
To the comment "better off without them"

People, like yourself that join the forces may do so for any number of good, honorable reasons. Being Canadian you bring a quality to the table or the field as may be the case, that is rare and elite over the world.

Your career like your life is anything but static. Most go into the service single, forward looking. They do their training, their tours and they get married and have kids which, thows any number of the old hominines out the door and change is inevitable.

Some feel its best for their immediate families they get out of the crush and go into a higher paying, safer industry because of home considerations more than anything.

No, I can't see the service being better off without them. I do appreciate a service allowing them to leave on good terms.

I joined the navy whe I was 14. That is another life time but I still remember the amazing rush I had in taking that step. I was in for a day and they kicked me out.

If you are in the Canadian Forces good luck to you. There is a large community in the public who support you and what you do. Like me, many don't know how to support.
 

the caracal kid

the clan of the claw
Nov 28, 2005
1,947
2
38
www.kdm.ca
Re: RE: Canada increases troops

Doryman said:
the caracal kid said:
dory,

one of perhaps the great deceptions played on the canadian populace comes through the media/mainstream euphemisms.

the populace is told soldiers are "peacekeepers", or "peacemakers", or some other term, along with (up until recently) a carefully controlled imagry of the forces. When the truth is revealed, it should be no surprise there is a backlash. The truth about the military and its operations are much less attractive than the "postcard" version used to sell it. Propaganda works wonders, so long as it is not undermined.

That propaganda didn't stem from the military, Caracal, it was purely a Liberal agenda. Most soldiers don't want to be seen as ineffectual hall monitors by the very people they serve.

And the truth is rarely pretty. Would you rather be given attractive lies?

don't kid yourself dory.

the military is complicit in creating a idealic image of itself. It must for its own purposes do such things. There is the politics of military as well as the politics of the people.

I do not desire attractive lies. I do not attempt to appease the mob.

I also do not pretend a scorpion is not a scorpion.

To Wednesday:

Things are not what they seem;
Nor are they otherwise.
- Lankavatara Sutra

defence does not ensure peace. understanding ensures peace.
 

Hank C

Electoral Member
Jan 4, 2006
953
0
16
Calgary, AB
Re: RE: Canada increases troops

Doryman said:
the caracal kid said:
dory,

one of perhaps the great deceptions played on the canadian populace comes through the media/mainstream euphemisms.

the populace is told soldiers are "peacekeepers", or "peacemakers", or some other term, along with (up until recently) a carefully controlled imagry of the forces. When the truth is revealed, it should be no surprise there is a backlash. The truth about the military and its operations are much less attractive than the "postcard" version used to sell it. Propaganda works wonders, so long as it is not undermined.

That propaganda didn't stem from the military, Caracal, it was purely a Liberal agenda. Most soldiers don't want to be seen as ineffectual hall monitors by the very people they serve.

And the truth is rarely pretty. Would you rather be given attractive lies?

Your both right, it does stem from media which does not inform the public very much about the role in Afghanistan or the role of Canada in the world. CBC is probably one of the worst offenders, as one can tell they are trying to push their belief agenda on you (just like foxnews in the US).

The military is likely not pushing this propaganda as it will only weaken their support at home when they are abroad risking their lives. Most soilders don't want to be seen as "ineffectual hall monitors" because they are not, they are not in Afghanistan to facilitate peace between the Taliban terrorist group and the Afghan people, they are they do fight.

I think if a PM came out and explained the mission to citizens there would be stronger public support. Right now there is too much crap spewed by the left and the leftist media who are trying to push their anti war, anti US propaganda.
 

Curiosity

Senate Member
Jul 30, 2005
7,326
138
63
California
CaracalKid

Understanding does create peace or maintains peace or keeps peace - however it doesn't seem to be working in Europe.

A strong defense at the ready is not a challenge - but a guarantee
a country means to keep peace within its borders.

If you have served in the military I'll reconsider your remarks both to me and Doryman as first hand knowledge and opinion.

If you have not served - then you cannot know what I mean by defense. You appear to see defense in conflict with understanding. You are wrong.
 

the caracal kid

the clan of the claw
Nov 28, 2005
1,947
2
38
www.kdm.ca
"A strong defense at the ready is not a challenge - but a guarantee"

It provides no guarentee at all.

Defense is both conficting with and not conflicting with understanding. There is more motivation when one is more vulnerable. It is easier to understand when one must understand.
 

Curiosity

Senate Member
Jul 30, 2005
7,326
138
63
California
Oh CaracalKid

What you just wrote..... how Zenlike....

It's easier to understand when one mustunderstand?

As in: when you are attacked you will know for certain?

Tell that to the people in London, France, Australia, Spain, Bali, Russia who have had their peaceful lives torn up by explosives for no reason other than madness. They were living with open understanding.

What do you say? Is it "understanding gone mad?"
 

the caracal kid

the clan of the claw
Nov 28, 2005
1,947
2
38
www.kdm.ca
But one must look for the "root" of the chain of events that led to explosive results.

Simply because people live in ignorance of the actions of their nations toward other nations is not enough.

Now as for military, no amount of military is going to prevent such civilian attacks unless one wishes to live under the gun oneself. Violence is the end product of a process, not the beginning.

The victims of bombings have their own governments to blame as much as anybody else, and those governments went about their ways that resulted in said attacks because they thought they did not need to understand, for the might of their armies gave them protection.

If is a bloody path you choose to walk, you must accept that blood will stain you.
 

Curiosity

Senate Member
Jul 30, 2005
7,326
138
63
California
CaracalKid

I hope what you believe to be true will in fact be true and you will be vindicated by your pronunciations of how to avoid conflict through understanding. It would be my choice if I had one.

It must be wonderful standing above the common man making pronouncements of what must be done - having all that knowledge stored inside when it should be shared with the world.

Meanwhile I'm going to practice my Kumbaya mantras....and hope you are right!

HankC/Cyberclark

If it's cool that will sort this global rumble out....I'll try it....I'll go sit in Antarctica if necessary! :roll:

Meanwhile I'll hang with the warriors wherever they are - whether right or wrong - they answer and I am grateful.