Federal government failing to put climate plan into action, environmental watchdog finds - Politics - CBC News
Well is anyone really shocked? It's simply not a big deal.
Well is anyone really shocked? It's simply not a big deal.
How does transporting oil by tankers both land ( rail cars ) or sea ( ocean freighters ) reduce carbon emissions ?Your article is before the latest pipeline cancellations which environmentalists are happy about because it greatly reduces carbon emissions.
They thank you for your support in their cause.
He can't!How does transporting oil by tankers both land ( rail cars ) or sea ( ocean freighters ) reduce carbon emissions ?
Does the same amount of oil not get used in Ontario, Quebec and the Maritimes ? Do the oil tankers not create more GHG's than pipelines .Please explain how this reduces carbon emissions ?
How does transporting oil by tankers both land ( rail cars ) or sea ( ocean freighters ) reduce carbon emissions ?
Does the same amount of oil not get used in Ontario, Quebec and the Maritimes ? Do the oil tankers not create more GHG's than pipelines .Please explain how this reduces carbon emissions ?
Looks like Canada is sticking to trucks and trains. As the article clearly states, the Trudeau Govt. is failing to keep to its climate change commitments.
But seriously... did anyone believe that they would?
How does transporting oil by tankers both land ( rail cars ) or sea ( ocean freighters ) reduce carbon emissions ?
Does the same amount of oil not get used in Ontario, Quebec and the Maritimes ? Do the oil tankers not create more GHG's than pipelines .Please explain how this reduces carbon emissions ?
Yes we already know we have enough oil, so pulling a pipeline doesn't mean increasing other methods of transport.
We already know that.
Common sense doesn't come easy to an ideologue!Silly fool... as Canada's population increases more fossil fuels will be needed. Therefore more road, rail, and water transport is needed. That means an increase of carbon emissions.
*snicker*
Silly fool... as Canada's population increases more fossil fuels will be needed. Therefore more road, rail, and water transport is needed. That means an increase of carbon emissions.
*snicker*
No you didn't. The pipeline would take us off foreign oil. How is relying on Saudi Arabia to supply eastern Canada helping anything or anyone but the Saudis? Are you seriously trying to suggest that a pipeline to eastern Canada would create more emissions than supertankers from the Middle East already generate? A pipeline would reduce our gross GHG emissions, not increase them.Already answered my furry neanderthals.
....
. How is relying on Saudi Arabia to supply eastern Canada helping anything or anyone but the Saudis? .
Hmmmn let me cut your buying power by 11% and tell you it is all fine .We don't really 'rely' on Saudi Arabia, since only 11% of our oil imports come from there.
Silly fool... as Canada's population increases more fossil fuels will be needed. Therefore more road, rail, and water transport is needed. That means an increase of carbon emissions.
*snicker*
We don't really 'rely' on Saudi Arabia, since only 11% of our oil imports come from there.
Hmmmn let me cut your buying power by 11% and tell you it is all fine .