Can a Christian be a liberal? Short answer: no.

Cosmo

House Member
Jul 10, 2004
3,725
22
38
Victoria, BC
Re: RE: Can a Christian be a liberal? Short answer: no.

I think not said:
aeon said:
quinton said:
Christians, muslims, jews and all religious people are morons.

Period.

Well said, no need to add anything else.

How tolerant, then you all wonder what people with faith are fighting about.

ITN ... Quinton and Aeon have done nothing but show their own personal shortcomings. I would rather hear that kind of honest bigotry than all the self-serving PC pap in the world. At least I know where I stand with those two.

As staff, I didn't bother to interfere with their posts since they didn't attack any one person in particular and because I think it's valuable for CanCon members to know that we still have knuckle draggers in the bunch. People who beat their chests and are limited to "Me good, religion bad" type of commentary are not really worthy of debating, imho. But they are still entitled to be who they are. ;)
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Your just not allowed to tell them they are knuckle draggers?
 

Sassylassie

House Member
Jan 31, 2006
2,976
7
38
Cosmo wrote: As staff, I didn't bother to interfere with their posts since they didn't attack any one person in particular and because I think it's valuable for CanCon members to know that we still have knuckle draggers in the bunch. People who beat their chests and are limited to "Me good, religion bad" type of commentary are not really worthy of debating, imho. But they are still entitled to be who they are.
:D :D

I'm new to this Lefty, Righty fight, so I don't have an answer to the question but, yes there's always a but? I don't think the Church and State should ever be in bed together. Never, never!
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Cosmo said:
Old testament isn't christian? Geez, ya learn something new every day. ;)

Let's just say there is a diffrence between the two.
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Cosmo

Yes they showed their own shortcomings, but they effectively lumped billions of people around the world in the moron column. So I must say that those who believe this, are part of one of two columns, the fringe left or the meek. Either one works as they both have interchangeable characteristics.
 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
Jay said:
Conservatives have given up a great deal in monetary terms to left ideals....incredible amounts of money. I consider anything over 25% of my income way, way to much to give up so people can buy votes with it. Another good example of conservatives giving up would be the fact you can't buy basic health insurance in Canada it's illegal to do so....
I don't think that income is being used to purchase votes; I think it's being used to provide programs to the people of Canada, to support us and to ensure that we live good lives. As for the idea of purchasing private medical insurance, that would divert resources from the public system, and those who desparately need care, who don't have the money, would be left to pray for a miracle.

Jay said:
I want protestant Christianity to be taught in public schools as it was when I went to school, but because certain people have deemed this to be taboo, I can't, and if I wish to send my kids to religious schools I have to pay for it myself, without a tax break against my exorbitant property taxes....we are getting screwed big time for the sake of the new religion which is leftism IMO.
Yeah, well, I don't want it to be taught in public schools. Go figure.

Jay said:
Gun control and the ability to defend ones self....I don't need to explain that one to you because we agree on the subject, but clearly the right has given this right up too....
Ah, yes. How we love our guns. I don't think that gun control should even be an issue. Guns are, in most cases, absolutely useless. People are using the guise of "hunting", more often than not, to justify gun ownership — and yet many of the guns they proposed to own would never be used in hunting, and are only used to kill people. I don't see any point in tolerating that.

Jay said:
Free speech.
I don't understand what you mean. If you're referring to the hate propaganda provisions in An Act respecting the Criminal Law, then I'm going to disagree with you here. There's always a proper way to express yourself, and that way needs to be taken. Fred Phelps shouldn't be allowed to broadcast commercials spewing his hatred on television, for example.

Jay said:
I'll give you the same sex rights issue, why not....I mean I know how Tommy Douglas thought about the issue and he said it was a mental disorder and he was a socialist NDPer....give me a break. I don't support what Tommy the NDP guy said...I think it is foolish. I support all the same rights for homos as I do hetros, with the minor difference being the term marriage, as there is just to load a voice that says these two unions should be deemed different. I don't think that is too much to ask.
For me, the issue is legal, to an extent. If same-sex couples were to have "unions" instead of "marriages", then the British commonlaw precedents that apply to marriages would not apply to same-sex couples. If the "rights" of that couple were ever challenged, then they would have an extremely difficult time defending themselves.

Jay said:
I just don't think "social programs" are part of the "Christian way". People like to throw around these words "social programming" as if it some de facto thing that was handed down from on high and need to be held in some reverence when further from the truth it couldn't be.
You're right, I don't think social programs are particularly Christian. Social programs imply that everyone has the right to a certain standard of living, regardless of their circumstances. That doesn't seem Christian to me.

Jay said:
An eye for an eye is Old Testament thinking...turn the other cheek is Christian. I do think there are some problems with some fundamentalist beliefs in Christianity, but they can't hold a candle to the competition.
If we interpreted the Bible as literally as the Qur'an is interpreted in some other nations, and applied it to the law, then we'd end up committing terrible acts against our own citizens when they did something wrong. If someone was stabbed, we'd stab them; if someone ate meat on Fridays, they'd be imprisoned. I don't see any reason to apply Christianity to the law in Canada.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Thanks Five...But I already realize you tow the Liberal line 100%.
 

Acudor

New Member
Jun 19, 2005
7
0
1
Ontario
RE: Can a Christian be a

Hi Darkbeaver, you wrote:

"mother Theresa prevented the use of birth control".

I am not aware of any occasion on which Mother Theresa 'prevented' anyone from using birth control. There is no doubt that she wasn't in favour of it and she councelled against it and she certainly wouldn't have assisted or belonged to a group that doled out birth control aids or who espoused practicing birth control but, did she actually prevent anyone from using it? Not to the best of my knowledge. Show me where she prevented anyone from using it and I will change my opinion on her but I can find no fault in someone who doesn't believe in birth control (or anything else for that matter) in not promoting it. That certainly wouldn't make her any less 'Christian' than someone who, for instance, worked for Planned Parenthood.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
I read your post and I said that I already know all this. Many of your answers are just verbatim what you have always said and the Liberal stance. You seem to tow the Liberal line 100%. Such as this line here....

I don't think that income is being used to purchase votes; I think it's being used to provide programs to the people of Canada, to support us and to ensure that we live good lives. As for the idea of purchasing private medical insurance, that would divert resources from the public system, and those who desparately need care, who don't have the money, would be left to pray for a miracle.
 

the caracal kid

the clan of the claw
Nov 28, 2005
1,947
2
38
www.kdm.ca
Cosmo, you are correct.

It is the liberals that DO, the conservatives that talk but do little to help others.

Jesus, if the bibilical character existed, would be considered a rebel today. He wanted to reform the old judaic beliefs, going agianst tradition. The jesus character went about helping people, with the exception of the documented hissy-fits. However, the many years after the supposed event recordings cosisting of approx 8 weeks of this man's life tell us while he was a rebel, he was also intolorant.

The answer in the modern world is that by the "ideals" of the teachings of jesus, christians should be liberal.
 

the caracal kid

the clan of the claw
Nov 28, 2005
1,947
2
38
www.kdm.ca
ITN,
I am not suggesting liberal as in progressive, adaptive, welcoming of new ideas, etc. I am not suggesting an ideology.

Jay,
liberals (not the parties or ideologues) are independent thinkers. As is well known to those that are non-linear, life and thought is more complex than one-dimension.
 

Jo Canadian

Council Member
Mar 15, 2005
2,488
1
38
PEI...for now
A Christian Can Be a Christian or a Liberal, But He Can’t Be Both...By Doug Giles

:roll: Does Douggy follow any of the politiks in the Vatican?? They've got their own liberal/conservative wings. This just seems to be more verbal diarreah against anyone Left (whatever that may be) on this silly left vs. right bullcrap.