Calgary breakthrough will make oil pipelines unnecessary

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
A Calgary engineer thinks an invention he stumbled upon in the laboratory could transform the way Alberta gets its heavy oil to market.

Ian Gates was researching ways to upgrade bitumen when he and his team accidentally found a way to degrade it, making it even more viscous — which, in turn, led to a discovery that they could envelope the oil in self-sealing pellets, with a liquid core and super-viscous skin.

These tough little balls of bitumen could be a pipeline-free way of getting Alberta oil to markets cheaply, sustainably and with less risk of environmental harm, said a release from the University of Calgary's Schulich School of Engineering, where Gates is a professor.

"We've taken heavy oil, or bitumen, either one, and we've discovered a process to convert them rapidly and reproducibly into pellets," Gates told CBC News.

With this, we can put it in a standard rail car. It can go to any port where a rail car goes, which is an immense number of them, to get product out from North America."

Gates says the pellets could be put in the thousands of rail cars built for coal that are now sitting idle.

Gates and his team of researchers have developed the technology to the point where they can make pellets of various sizes right at the wellhead, using about the same amount of energy as it takes to add diluent to the bitumen to liquefy it for shipping via pipelines.

"Think Advil," Gates said. "You have the chemical material ... we're then exposing that material, on the outside, to a set of heat, pressure conditions, that then yield a asphaltine-rich coating. So, really just a coating that bounds the inner material."

video

Balls of bitumen: Calgary breakthrough will make oil pipelines unnecessary, researcher claims - Calgary - CBC News
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,545
9,612
113
Washington DC
I'm willing to look at the numbers. Particularly interested in developmental cost vs. capital investment in another pipeline. Incremental engineering improvements like this are more important that earth-shattering "breakthroughs."
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
The cost of delivery is the key. Also the extra amount of truck and rail traffic. Sheer volume might make it impractical. But there is the possibility that pellets could be moved by pipeline.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Gee, I wonder where the sudden motivation to develop alternatives to pipelines came from?


 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
The cost of delivery is the key. Also the extra amount of truck and rail traffic. Sheer volume might make it impractical. But there is the possibility that pellets could be moved by pipeline.



True. And in many mining operations, transporting the ore as a slurry in a pipeline is cheaper/better than using trucks and/or railcars, so I expect that heavy oil would be the same.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
Gee, I wonder where the sudden motivation to develop alternatives to pipelines came from?


From people who don't understand transport risks. The American Railway Association has stated that rail is the absolute worst way to transport oil. But of course you and some dude in Calgary would know better than those who run the rail industry.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
From people who don't understand transport risks. The American Railway Association has stated that rail is the absolute worst way to transport oil. But of course you and some dude in Calgary would know better than those who run the rail industry.

What a dumb fukking post.

Try reading the OP again.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
The cost of delivery is the key. Also the extra amount of truck and rail traffic. Sheer volume might make it impractical. But there is the possibility that pellets could be moved by pipeline.


We won't have to worry about it in our life time! :)
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
This tech is limited to bitumen alone. Light, medium and heavy oils will not be suitable for this tech.

Bottom line is that as long as the market demands oil, there will be pipelines in place to transport it
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Will that curb the exploitation of child slaves in Africa digging cobalt?

You simply don't understand the bigger picture here.

The child slave-laborers doing the actual work are more eco-friendly in that they emit fewer GHGs and, of course, don't require gas or diesel to operate.

The calculated reduction on emissions of this, as opposed to using mining equipment that runs of gas/diesel will directly offset the heavy increase in rail and trucking usage to move the oil pellets.

.... All in all, this is what's best for Mother Gaia
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
You simply don't understand the bigger picture here.

The child slave-laborers doing the actual work are more eco-friendly in that they emit fewer GHGs and, of course, don't require gas or diesel to operate.

The calculated reduction on emissions of this, as opposed to using mining equipment that runs of gas/diesel will directly offset the heavy increase in rail and trucking usage to move the oil pellets.

.... All in all, this is what's best for Mother Gaia

Now you're venturing into Danbones lunacy territory.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
What a dumb fukking post.

Try reading the OP again.
Speaking of f*cking dumb, try thinking Lac Megantic. Didn't see shit in the article that says this technology prevents fires and explosions in case of accident. Or did you f*cktardedly think (pardon the gross exaggeration) that liquid spills were the only concern expressed by the railroads? There have been 11 other oil trains that wrecked and exploded in North America since Lac Megantic.

Duhhhhh!
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Read between the goal posts instead of desperately trying to move them.

Speaking of f*cking dumb, try thinking Lac Megantic. Didn't see shit in the article that says this technology prevents fires and explosions in case of accident. Or did you f*cktardedly think (pardon the gross exaggeration) that liquid spills were the only concern expressed by the railroads? There have been 11 other oil trains that wrecked and exploded in North America since Lac Megantic.

Duhhhhh!

You're still a Trumptard.

Just like cap'n, your desperate attempts to make this about rail is just as pathetic as his attempts to make it about self driving cars.


Fukk you guys are dumb.