It's amazing how the references to old technologies persist in the new ones. We still refer to telephones as "ringing" even though they haven't had bells in them for decades. Everyone knows that telephones sound like bamboo xylophones.
It's amazing how the references to old technologies persist in the new ones. We still refer to telephones as "ringing" even though they haven't had bells in them for decades. Everyone knows that telephones sound like bamboo xylophones.
Buttons don't bite private parts when you're rushed
It's amazing how the references to old technologies persist in the new ones. We still refer to telephones as "ringing" even though they haven't had bells in them for decades. Everyone knows that telephones sound like bamboo xylophones.
Took me a while to trust the electronnic calculators when they first came out....
It's amazing how the references to old technologies persist in the new ones. We still refer to telephones as "ringing" even though they haven't had bells in them for decades. Everyone knows that telephones sound like bamboo xylophones.
Most kids don't know what the icon means that saves their documents in Microsoft Word.
I think that was considered rude in some circles.![]()
I think it's mainly a matter of semantics, depending a lot on when you are talking about. If anything I'd say for the past 40 years "standard" should refer to automatic transmissions. "Three on the tree" was common for a few years starting in the 40s.How many people still call a manual transmission a "standard" (although standard was actually the old three-on-the-tree) Or when you watch kids play "train" why do they make eccentric crank motions, chugging sounds and go "Woo-ooo Woo Wooooo)?
It was considered rude, JLM but nosy neighbors and bored kids did it anyway - and I confess, I was one of those bored kids.