Here is an article as well as a video of an interview with Mr. Bush on his Middle East solution.
Don't miss it!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7397400.stm
Don't miss it!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7397400.stm
Yes, that is my suspicion.Your article seems to point to the Gov being the 'instigator'.
Iraq is s classic example of that tactic.The US has shown that their preferred method of war is to disarm the intended target as much as possible before any actual assault.
Like the US, they have the means to do that. The US has made sure the Israeli air force is well equipped.The IDF knows they can't win a ground war, their method is to destroy the infrastructure in the hopes that the civilians (the ones targeted by such actions) will revolt, that hope has so-far backfired every time.
Damn right! Whoever has the power dictates the rules of conduct. "Do as I say, not as I do!"The fact that the US can and does supply many arms to the ME kind of makes their argument that 'other Nations' shouldn't do that more than just a bit fuked-up from any angle you look at it.
Good point! One I hadn't thought of. Iran is the main thorn in Bush's eye. The ultimate aim is to neuter Ahmadineshad!!!! To make a "Yes, Sir!" servant out of him and his country. But meanwhile it is not considered a loss of aim to nibble away on the smaller, much less powerful countries, either by democratizing them or rendering them impotent through dependence on Western aid.If Iran persuades Hezbollah to pull back (while getting their phones back) the US and Israel would still claim 'See, they do control them'. Iran could already be 'holding talks' with the aim of stopping the actual battles.
Imagine the chaos of inoperative ATM's. And that's just one of the hundreds of delicate situations that our culture rests on. Just remove one item of food or fuel from the matrix and whatch the problem snowball into crisis. This is also an indication of how phoney the manufactured terrorism crisis really is, if just the chicken production we're sabotaged in N America the commercial carnage would be enormous and to infect those herds and flocks would be very easy and very destructive. So why hasn't it happened? Either we have very incompetant international terrorists or we have a staged holly-wood production.I have to admit that 'meddling' seems to just fine for one group but condemned if anybody else speaks out or supplies material things.
Do you really think that could happen? Put all the ATM's out of order (done in about 3 seconds) and nobody is going anywhere.
Good Morning, Beaver!!Hezbollahs only crime is it's power to unify the Lebanese people and that power of unification is what the wealthy banking scum fear the most. Soon it will happen in Canada, the citizens will retake political power from the wealthy and corporate supremacy will be crushed.
Wasn't one of Bush's 'solution' to disarm Hezbollah? I don't see that as a condition in the above
What he said is this:Wasn't one of Bush's 'solution' to disarm Hezbollah? I don't see that as a condition in the above
it's all in this link. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7397400.stmThe US is prepared to help strengthen Lebanon's army so it can disarm Hezbollah, US President George W Bush said in an interview with the BBC.
He said the US was helping the Lebanese army become effective enough to act against Hezbollah's armed wing.
Don't worry, he's got his aides!;-)Did you expect anything that made sense to come out of the mouth of George Doublya? He couldn't remember what he said yesterday today.
What he said is this:it's all in this link. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7397400.stm
I don't think so. It was the Hezbollah doing the fighting with Israel.Okay, was I close enough? The disarming wasn't one of the 3 things listed. There hasn't been a lot of conflict (gunfire) between the two parties and in all seriousness both parties better remain well armed. I would hope they would 'unite' in the face of a larger threat. How did they react when Israel was bombing them, did they fight each other?