Britons are descended from the Beaker people, not the builders of Stonehenge

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,296
1,790
113
Stonehenge has a proud place in Britain's history as one of the wonders of the world and the best-known prehistoric monument in Europe.

But, according to a major new study, modern-day Britons are barely related to the ingenious Neolithic farmers who built the monument 5,000 years ago.

Instead the British are related to the 'Beaker people' who travelled from modern-day Holland and all but wiped out Stonehenge's creators...

How the builders of Stonehenge 5,000 years ago were almost completely wiped out by mysterious 'Beaker people' from the continent whose blood runs in Brit veins to this day


Today, British have more DNA from the 'Beaker people' than Neolithic farmers

Many experts believed it was just Beaker culture which was exported to Britain

The new evidence comes from DNA analysis of 400 prehistoric skeletons

The genes of these ancient people provide enough clues to determine that Beakers travelled here from Holland and took over in a few centuries

By Cecile Borkhataria For Mailonline and Victoria Allen Science Correspondent For The Daily Mail
22 February 2018

Stonehenge has a proud place in Britain's history as one of the wonders of the world and the best-known prehistoric monument in Europe.

But, according to a major new study, modern-day Britons are barely related to the ingenious Neolithic farmers who built the monument 5,000 years ago.

Instead the British are related to the 'Beaker people' who travelled from modern-day Holland and all but wiped out Stonehenge's creators.

The findings are 'absolutely sort of mind-blowing,' said archaeologist Barry Cunliffe, a professor emeritus at the University of Oxford.

'They are going to upset people, but that is part of the excitement of it.'


The Beaker people reached Britain around 4,500 years ago, and within 500 years, almost completely wiped out the original inhabitants. Researchers still aren't sure how this happened, but they suggest disease may be the cause, as the Beaker people were a peaceful population


Many experts believed it was just Beaker pottery-making and culture which was exported to Britain between 4,400 and 4,700 years ago - not the people themselves.

But the new evidence comes from DNA analysis of 400 prehistoric skeletons, some from after Stonehenge and others born before it was created.

The genes of these ancient people provide enough clues to determine that Beakers travelled here from Holland and took over in a few centuries.

They replaced 90 per cent of the Neolithic farmers who built the monument and had lived here for 1,500 years.

The creators of Stonehenge appeared Mediterranean, with olive-hued skin, dark hair and eyes.


Pictured is a double 'Beaker' grave excavated at Trumpington Meadows, Cambridgeshire, by the Cambridge Archaeological Unit. The grave is that of a 16–18 year-old female and a 17–20 year-old male and dates to around 2000-1950 BC. Both are buried with a fineware Beaker pottery


But the Beaker people were more like white modern British people, with fair skin, lighter hair and eyes.

The Beaker people may have killed off the ancient engineers behind Stonehenge by bringing the bubonic plague to Britain.


DNA from people from Beaker people (above) reveal that they descended from nomadic herders

Dr Mike Parker Pearson, co-author of the study and professor of British later prehistory at University College London, said: 'Most of us have thought the people who built Stonehenge were our direct ancestors, but actually this study shows that they are only distantly related to us, if at all.

'We now realise these people had totally disappeared from the British population within 1,000 years.'

Stonehenge, thought at various times to have been a temple of healing, a calendar or even a royal cemetery, attracts more than a million tourists to Wiltshire each year.

Its 82 bluestones, each weighing up to four tons, are believed to have been rolled, sledged and rafted from Wales to their final destination.

While exactly how Stonehenge was made remains a puzzle, the new study at least sheds light on who its creators were.

A team of archaeologists led by Harvard University and London's Natural History Museum found we only share only 10 per cent of our DNA with its engineers, and 90 per cent with the Beaker people - named after the pottery drinking tumblers they made.

Dr Tom Booth, an archaeologist from the Natural History Museum, said: 'This spectacular transformation of Britain, with such a large number of Beaker people coming here is the opposite of what experts have thought for the last 10 to 20 years.

'The textbooks need to be ripped up.'


The new evidence comes from DNA analysis of 400 prehistoric skeletons (two pictured), some from after Stonehenge and others born before it was created


Two fineware beakers excavated from the Trumpington Meadows, Cambridge double beaker burial. This bell-shaped pottery style spread across western and central Europe 4,700-4,400 years ago

The Beakers were probably a peaceful people, with no evidence that they dispatched the Neolithic farmers by violent means.

Disease is the most likely reason for the Stonehenge creators' demise.

The research, published in the journal Nature, is the largest study of ancient human DNA ever conducted, by an international team of 144 archaeologists and geneticists.


The map labelled A shows the distribution of new genetic samples used in this study. B shows the approximate time ranges for samples with new genetic data. Sample sizes are given next to each bar. Beaker associated DNA (circled in red) can be seen across Europe


Professor Ian Barnes, a co-senior author of the study from the Natural History Museum, said: 'We found that the skeletal remains of individuals from Britain who lived shortly after the first Beaker pottery appears have a very different DNA profile to those who came before.

'Over several hundred years, at least 90 per cent of the ancestry of ancient British populations was replaced by a group from the continent. Following the Beaker spread, there was a population in Britain that for the first time had ancestry and skin and eye pigmentation similar to the majority of Britons today.'

The Beaker culture spread to other places carried by large-scale human migration, says co-senior author of Wolfgang Haak, a geneticist from the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena, Germany.


Left: A beaker pot from Sierentz, France. Right: Beaker pot from a grave in East Yorkshire. New research has shown that this Beaker style pottery spread across western and central Europe between 4,700 and 4,400 years ago via migration as well as the exchange of ideas


Left: A Beaker pot housed at the National Museum of Scotland. Right: 'All-Over-Cord' Beaker pot from Bathgate, West Lothian

'In 2015, we and others showed that around 4,500 years ago there was a minimum 70 per cent replacement of the population of north-central Europe by massive migrations of groups from the eastern European steppe.

'This new study reveals how the wave rolled west.'

Another associated study, also published in Nature, found that local-hunter gatherer people who originally lived on the steppes of Central Asia, north of the Black and Caspian seas, were replaced by nomadic herders, called the Yamnaya.

These people were able to expand rapidly by exploiting horses and the new invention of the cart, and they left behind big, rich burial sites.

Archaeologists have long known that some of the technologies used by the Yamnaya later spread to Europe, but the revelation from the ancient DNA was that the people moved too - all the way to the Atlantic coast of Europe in the west to Mongolia in the east and India in the south.


Stonehenge has a proud place in Britain's history as one of the wonders of the world and the best-known prehistoric monument in Europe. But, according to a major new study, modern-day Britons are barely related to the ingenious Neolithic farmers who built the monument

This vast migration helps explain the spread of Indo-European languages and it significantly replaced the local hunter-gatherer genes across Europe with steppe DNA, as happened in Britain with the migration of the Bell Beaker people to the island.

The additional paper also reveals an additional migration as farming spread across Europe, based on data from 255 individuals who lived between 14,000 and 2,500 years ago.

It also adds new information - the first compelling evidence that the genetic mixing of populations in Europe was biased toward one sex, as hunter-gathered genes remaining in northern Europe after the influx of migrating farmers came more from males than females.

'Archaeological evidence shows that when farmers first spread into northern Europe, they stopped at a latitude where their crops didn't grow well,' says lead author David Reich, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator at Harvard Medical School.

'As a result, there were persistent boundaries between the farmers and the hunter-gatherers for a couple of thousand years.'

WHAT IS BELL BEAKER CULTURE?



A facial reconstruction of "Ava", a woman of the Beaker people, whose bones were found at Achavanich, Caithness

Between 4,700 and 4,400 years ago, a new bell-shaped pottery style spread across western and central Europe, and this period is called the 'Bell Beaker'.

The period received its name due to the pottery's distinctive bell-shaped beakers, decorated in horizontal zones by finely toothed stamps.

The decorated pots are almost ubiquitous across Europe, and could have been used as drinking vessels or ceremonious urns.

Believed to be originally from Spain, the Beaker folk soon spread into central and western Europe in their search for metals.

But the sheer variety of beaker artifacts across Europe has made the pottery difficult to define as coming from one distinctive culture.

A new study published in Nature suggests that the Beaker culture spread through Europe via two different mechanisms - the spread of ideas and migration.


Beaker-complex grave goods from La Sima III barrow, Soria, Spain. The set includes Beaker pots of the so-called 'Maritime style'

Read more: Neolithic farmers were wiped out by Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,296
1,790
113
Lookalikes


Danny Alexander, Chief Secretary to the Treasury in the Tory-Liberal Democrat coalition government, 2010-15


Beaker the Muppet
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Maybe, the Beaker people were the white guys who swept in from the Continent and killed off the black guys who built Stonehenge.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,296
1,790
113
Maybe, the Beaker people were the white guys who swept in from the Continent and killed off the black guys who built Stonehenge.

Well that's almost the article in a nutshell.

The chaps who built Stonehenge weren't black, thought. They were olive-skinned like today's Mediterranean people.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Not according to the article.

Do they have many/any Neolithic genomes? They have one, anyway ...Cheddar Man. Perhaps, the article isn't up to date and the "olive complexion" part is fanciful speculation like most of this has been before DNA analysis?
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,296
1,790
113
Do they have many/any Neolithic genomes? They have one, anyway ...Cheddar Man.

Cheddar Man was Mesolithic.

Perhaps, the article isn't up to date and the "olive complexion" part is fanciful speculation like most of this has been before DNA analysis?

Do you have some sort of problem with the builders of Stonehenge being olive-skinned rather than black? You're not one of those racists, are you?

Here's an interesting fact:

Cheddar Man lived 10,000 years ago.

Stonehenge was completed in around 2,000BC - 4,000 years ago.

Which means that the people working on the completion of Stonehenge looking back to the time of Cheddar Man were looking further back in time than us now looking back to the people who completed Stonehenge.

Cheddar Man was more ancient to those who completed Stonehenge than they are to us.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Cheddar Man was Mesolithic.



Do you have some sort of problem with the builders of Stonehenge being olive-skinned rather than black? You're not one of those racists, are you?

Here's an interesting fact:

Cheddar Man lived 10,000 years ago.

Stonehenge was completed in around 2,000BC - 4,000 years ago.

Which means that the people working on the completion of Stonehenge looking back to the time of Cheddar Man were looking further back in time than us now looking back to the people who completed Stonehenge.

Cheddar Man was more ancient to those who completed Stonehenge than they are to us.

How do they know the skin colour of the Neolithic? Do they have data or are they just guessing?
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,296
1,790
113
How do they know the skin colour of the Neolithic? Do they have data or are they just guessing?

It was not until 7,800 years ago, when the first farmers migrated from the Near East through Turkey, that two key genes that provide lighter skin appeared.

DNA analysis obtained from ancient human remains has shown that as these farmers bred with the dark skinned hunter gatherers, one of these genes became prevalent in the European population and European's skin colour began to lighten.

Around 5,800 years ago the second gene, which makes skin colour lighter still, also began to spread though the European population.

Read more: Europeans were dark-skinned until 8,000 years ago | Daily Mail Online
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
It was not until 7,800 years ago, when the first farmers migrated from the Near East through Turkey, that two key genes that provide lighter skin appeared.

DNA analysis obtained from ancient human remains has shown that as these farmers bred with the dark skinned hunter gatherers, one of these genes became prevalent in the European population and European's skin colour began to lighten.

Around 5,800 years ago the second gene, which makes skin colour lighter still, also began to spread though the European population.

Read more: Europeans were dark-skinned until 8,000 years ago | Daily Mail Online

Is this British data? Britain is an island and after the land bridges were below water, these things happened there much later.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Well, so now you know the results of uncontrolled immigration.
Which these days (Like when, as I am sure BL remembers, soros destroyed the british pound) and now in an effort to profit from national destruction AGAIN funds a similar form of open immigration as is mentioned in the above article.

Left-wing billionaire’s think-tank aims to use migrant crisis to influence immigration policies worldwide: Plans of George Soros's think-tank are revealed in leaked memo
The leaked document is from the Open Society Foundations (OSF)

It's a left-wing think tank based in New York and founded by Soros

The memo says that the refugee crisis is an 'opportunity' for influence

It says that it's a chance to collaborate with other wealthy donors
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Soros-s-think-tank-revealed-leaked-memo.html

George Soros behind plan to flood EU with cheap migrant labour
https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...ungary-blocks-it-ruling-Fidesz-party-election

There you have it: CC (who hates criticism of the jew burner ) I guess also agrees with the destruction of Britain's financial structure and resident workforce. Which will leave the current residents of Britain in the same situation as the builders of stonehenge.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,296
1,790
113
Is this British data? Britain is an island and after the land bridges were below water, these things happened there much later.

The Neolithic Britons (Stonehenge builders) weren't descended from the Mesolithic Britons (such as Cheddar Man).

The people who built Stonehenge were descended from people who had arrived 1,500 years earlier - long after Cheddar Man's time.

Then the Stonehenge builders were in turn replaced by the Beaker people - the ancestors of today's Britons

Extraordinary new genetic evidence is revealing how Britain experienced a mysterious almost total change in its population in just a few centuries after the construction of Stonehenge.

It suggests that some sort of social, economic or epidemiological catastrophe unfolded.

The great 20-30 tonne stones of Stonehenge were erected by Neolithic farmers whose ancestors had lived in Britain for at least the previous 1,500 years – and new genetic research on 51 skeletons from all over Neolithic Britain has now revealed that during the whole of the Neolithic era, the country was inhabited mainly by olive-skinned, dark-haired Mediterranean-looking people.

But some 300 to 500 years after the main phase of Stonehenge was built, that mainly Mediterranean-looking British Neolithic-originating element of the population had declined from almost 100 percent to just 10 per cent of the population.

The new genetic research reveals that the other 90 per cent were a newly-arrived central-European- originating population (known to archaeologists as the Beaker People) who appear to have settled in Britain between 2500 BC and 2000 BC via the Netherlands.

But how this dramatic population change occurred is an almost complete mystery.

There’s absolutely no evidence for any large-scale conflict – so warfare or genocide is almost certainly not the explanation.

It’s much more likely that the incoming population, with more advanced technology (including metal-working), gained control of the best land and resources and succeeded in economically marginalising the Neolithic population.

There is also a distinct possibility that the native Neolithic population of Britain had no resistance to some continental European diseases. There is some evidence from Europe that bubonic plague may have been the culprit.


Britain's prehistoric catastrophe revealed: How 90% of the neolithic population vanished in just 300 years | The Independent
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
The sea trade form the mediterranean stopped or was reduced dramatically at about 2500 BC.
As far as I know the first ( and SEA GOING )pharaoh of egypt died in ireland at 2700 ish BC according to stones that used to be readable in Ireland, but have been destroyed in the last 70 years or so.

The need for TIN may have taken a dive then too.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
A plague of some sort may have accompanied the Beaker People. The same thing happened here in North America and right here where I live when Europeans brought Smallpox with them. The people living right where I am were the Wyandotte, who were settled farmers who lived in substantial communities, almost exactly as the British Neolithic people's were. They were totally wiped out soon after Europeans landed in the New World and long before many of them moved in here (about 200 years earlier). A bit of that was the result of distant warfare but almost all of it was caused by Smallpox sweeping through the place. The natives, here that the settlers encountered are the itinerant Mississagua hunter-gatherers and the Wyandotte villages and farms lay abandoned and crumbled.

What sort of plague could the Beaker people have brought? Something that the indigenous Britons had not yet encountered. I read a suggestion that it might have been Bubonic Plague but surely, that would have wiped out the Beaker People as well? It might have been Smallpox, as the Beakers may have built up an immunity by surviving it on the Continent. Maybe, it is something else that is still with us but that with inherited immunity has become less deadly to us ... Measles? Mumps? Rubella? Dyptheria?
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
If there was plague there would be bodies.

The previous people had massive sea trade, so no, not immigrant plague.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Stonehenge has a proud place in Britain's history as one of the wonders of the world and the best-known prehistoric monument in Europe.

But, according to a major new study, modern-day Britons are barely related to the ingenious Neolithic farmers who built the monument 5,000 years ago.

[/URL]
[/COLOR]


Kudos, Blackloaf, after all these years of drivel you've posted something really interesting!

Upon close examination of that grave site, my future doesn't look terribly bright. :)
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
The sea trade form the mediterranean stopped or was reduced dramatically at about 2500 BC.
As far as I know the first ( and SEA GOING )pharaoh of egypt died in ireland at 2700 ish BC according to stones that used to be readable in Ireland, but have been destroyed in the last 70 years or so.

The need for TIN may have taken a dive then too.

Some major ecological disaster happened that also wiped out the Mycenaean Greeks, Minoans and Phoeneicians almost all at once.

Plague of some sort?

I'm sick at home today with a nasty virus.

Did a new, virulent Influenza kill them off? They evolve rapidly, come out of nowhere and have been capable of wiping out populations.

If there was plague there would be bodies.

The previous people had massive sea trade, so no, not immigrant plague.

They cremated their dead, before the Breaker People.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Sorry to hear you are sick..that sucks for anyone.
Illness may have played a part, but it was their version of globalism at the time that did them in.

1177 BC: The Year Civilization Collapsed (Eric Cline, PhD)

[youtube]bRcu-ysocX4[/youtube]

This is a really interesting vid I thought.

It has been claimed that tin was first mined in Europe around 2500 BC in Erzgebirge, and knowledge of tin bronze and tin extraction techniques spread from there to Brittany and Cornwall around 2000 BC and from northwestern Europe to northwestern Spain and Portugal around the same time
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tin_sources_and_trade_in_ancient_times

It became profitable to invade.