And that's the only place to send them to, even if they're not from there.
National/border sovereignty means nothing to you?
There's national and border sovereignty, and then there are people fleeing out of fear of their lives wanting a safe place to go.
At that point they are. Nobody is traveling to Britain in a small boat unless they were already in France. And they most likely worked their way up from Italy and Greece. Lots'a places to settle before crossing The Channel. Britain isn't exactly abundant with space, unlike the rest of Europe. Maybe it's because they have more and better freebies?
That's all true enough, though I'd question the "freebies" bit.
For that matter how is it ANY different than the fuckers who cross at Roxham Road?
IF they are refugees and planning to stay in the US, but then decide to go to Canada, that's different than the "we want to go to Canada to begin with but agreements/laws require us to proclaim in the US because it's where we landed first".
They were already in a safe country with lots and lots of space and a govt that virtue signaled the living fuck out of it itself about how welcome they all were and that "nobody is illegal".
Who says that "nobody is illegal"? I've heard quite a few make the distinction between illegal and refugees.
And then virtue signaled the living fuck out of what was left of their "morality" when the illegals were shipped to Democrat states from Texas and Florida.
LOL - okay Jin. Need a Snickers break?
The "virtue signal" out of those situations was the GOP asshats sending people unknowingly, lying about it and ill prepared to deal with weather to those places all because they "care" about the border.
And those places stepping up at the sudden, unannounced influx and doing what people should do.
The same Democrats who are quietly shipping them off to the Roxham Road crossing (and most likely other "crossings") to make them someone else's problem, ours.
Now THAT, that I take issue with but truthfully I haven't looked into it in depth so I can't comment other than fuck the Dems who have done this.
And I know this may come as a shock to you but, just because someone claims to be a refugee doesn't automatically make them a refugee.
I never said it did, or implied it.
Shock might be for you that anyone who claims refugee STILL has to pass background checks to validate that claim and if it's not, they're sent to the "gotta go back home and do it again" train. Or did you really not know this?
