Pick up any history book and start there.
I'll let you know.
By the way, there is no problem with resource depletion as long as we have a working, alternative method to substitute for that resource. Of course, if we're out of oil in the next couple of generations, not only is the environment ****ed - but all the money in the world won't buy us technological advancement.
All those trees that were planted and hugged back in the late 80's are now ready for harvest.Thats rich. You figure we can just stop replanting what we log and turn the land into subdivisions just because there are alternatives to lumber for building?
That will go over real well with your greenie buddies. Us loggers want to keep things growing so our kids and their kids can have good paying jobs.
That's a given at this point.
When you grow up and figure out that sustainable developement and Bolshevism are one in the same perhaps you'll understand why.I never knew so many people could get their knickers in a knot over one word.
Sure you may be able to sound out big words like dextromethorphan after take a phonetics class but do you know what it means?One of the requests made by the site admin in its suggestion for behaviour of posters on Canadian Content Forums is to kindly refrain from making one liner posts. Which would lead me to understand that there are definite comprehension issues with a couple of the posters anyway. I'm just curious, do you two think that red herrings and ad homs are just really neat new tricks?
If you really can't address the issues being raised, for whatever reason, why do you feel it necessary to post.
Tell me about it...I never knew so many people could get their knickers in a knot over one word.
What a fine example thereof, lol.NDP love sustainable development.
Libs love sustainable development.
Alberta PCs love sustainable development.
Just poor ol' Harpie is left out.
There's nothing new about the content of your posts.I'm just curious, do you two think that red herrings and ad homs are just really neat new tricks?
Thats rich. You figure we can just stop replanting what we log and turn the land into subdivisions just because there are alternatives to lumber for building?
That will go over real well with your greenie buddies. Us loggers want to keep things growing so our kids and their kids can have good paying jobs.
How the in Hell could you **** that up too? Everyone else knows it's "okay" not all right."I'm a lumberjack and I'm all right....."
I'm sure we'll see you follow up the following...One of the requests made by the site admin in its suggestion for behaviour of posters on Canadian Content Forums is to kindly refrain from making one liner posts. Which would lead me to understand that there are definite comprehension issues with a couple of the posters anyway. I'm just curious, do you two think that red herrings and ad homs are just really neat new tricks?
If you really can't address the issues being raised, for whatever reason, why do you feel it necessary to post.
"I'm a lumberjack and I'm all right....."
How the in Hell could you **** that up too? Everyone else knows it's "okay" not all right.
You seem not to know of Gulags and show trials. Of bullet manufacturing and apartment building. In all those and some other areas the Bolsheviks made just enough and of just the right size to not strain resources beyond the capacity to scrounge more and to raise the expectations of the people.I've been through a couple and don't remember any where there was a reference to sustainability in reference to the Bolsheviks. Was there one in particular that you came across and found particularly revealing, or incriminating, or whatever it is that would make someone say that the Bolshies tried sustainability and look where it got them?
Sustainability is the capacity to endure. For humans, sustainability is the long-term maintenance of responsibility, which has environmental, economic, and social dimensions, and encompasses the concept of stewardship, the responsible management of resource use. In ecology, sustainability describes how biological systems remain diverse and productive over time, a necessary precondition for the well-being of humans and other organisms. Long-lived and healthy wetlands and forests are examples of sustainable biological systems.