Biden Addresses Racism Against Asians

[HarperCons]

so you're too dumb to answer the question I'll answer it for you.
Nazi's had a capitalist economy
The Economist magazine even coined the term "privatization" in describing their economy.

 

[petros]

And?

 

[Twin_Moose]

so you're too dumb to answer the question I'll answer it for you.
Nazi's had a capitalist economy
The Economist magazine even coined the term "privatization" in describing their economy.

What was the name of their party again?

Just like Harris/Biden and crew are trying to do they capped Corporations on the amount of profit they can make at the same time encouraging them to hire more people and rewarding them with more contracts to reduce the large number of unemployment they had.

Within the next year (If they make it) watch Harris/Biden try to do the same thing (cap profits) to pay for their new social programs

 

[HarperCons]

so you feel the name of their party was more important than their actions.

 

[spaminator]

U.S. Justice Department to investigate rising tide of attacks on Asian Americans
Author of the article:Reuters
Reuters
Sarah N. Lynch
Publishing date:Feb 26, 2021 • 54 minutes ago • 1 minute read • comment bubbleJoin the conversation
Protestors hold signs at the End The Violence Towards Asians rally in Washington Square Park on February 20, 2021 in New York.
Protestors hold signs at the End The Violence Towards Asians rally in Washington Square Park on February 20, 2021 in New York. PHOTO BY DIA DIPASUPIL /Getty Images
Article content
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Justice Department said on Friday it would investigate the rising tide of hate crimes in America, as Asian Americans have experienced a growing number of racially motivated attacks since former President Donald Trump began referring to COVID-19 as a “China virus.”

“The United States is currently facing unprecedented challenges, some of which are fueling increased bigotry and hatred,” said Pamela Karlan, the principal deputy assistant attorney general for the Civil Rights Division.


She added that her office is working with the FBI, federal prosecutors and local police to “evaluate possible hate crimes,” without providing further details.

A Justice Department official told Reuters the statement was a direct response to the increasing reports of violence against Asian Americans.

From March of 2020 to December of last year, there were more than 2,800 reported incidents of anti-Asian hate incidents in the United States, according to Stop AAPI Hate, a coalition that has been collecting data.

Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content

While verbal harassment has made up more than 70% of the incidents, more than 8% involved physical assaults.

In one such example, a surveillance video that has since gone viral showed a 91-year-old Asian man in Oakland, California, being shoved to the ground on Jan. 31.

A suspect in the attack was later arrested, and now faces multiple assault charges for a number of Chinatown incidents. Prosecutors are also investigating whether the attacks were racially motivated.


Another high-profile example includes the January murder of Vichar Ratanapakdee, an 84-year-old immigrant from Thailand who was shoved to the ground in San Francisco and never regained consciousness after the fall.

San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin has since charged a suspect in Ratanapakdee’s death.

U.S. Justice Department to investigate rising tide of attacks on Asian Americans

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Justice Department said on Friday it would investigate the rising tide of hate crimes in America, as Asian Americans have experienced a…

torontosun.com

 

[Twin_Moose]

Looking forward to the report after the investigation, disgusting if it was race hate, but will it be published?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365683707689005056

 

[Jinentonix]

where's your point

The point being that "nazi" is a derogatory term given to Hitler and his gang of criminal thugs by those in Germany who strongly opposed them. The term "nazi" comes from the name "Ignace" which became an insult, similar to "Karen" today but with a different meaning. An "Ignace" or "nazi" is a backwards, backwoods bumpkin. In other words, someone like you who if you lived in a village, you'd be the village idiot.

 

[HarperCons]

You seem to be confused, have no real point, and instead of actually staying on topic you'd rather post your wikipedia knowledge.

 

[Twin_Moose]

Once you get your terms right then one can discuss socialism in it's different forms

 

[Twin_Moose]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365700683811467268

 

[Jinentonix]

You seem to be confused, have no real point, and instead of actually staying on topic you'd rather post your wikipedia knowledge.

Not confused, made the point quite succinctly, and don't have to stay on topic to directly respond to your troglodytic, knuckle dragging posts. As for your constant pissing about wikipedia, once again shit head, I've been studying this shit for 45 years now. I've probably forgotten more about it than you ever learned.

 

[Jinentonix]

Once you get your terms right then one can discuss socialism in it's different forms

Hitler was quite socialist, but only to those were registered members of the NSDAP. For example, much like the rest of Europe, a university education in Germany depended entirely on your social station ie; nobility or other "upper class" twit. Hitler scrapped that bit of caste system bullshit and provided free tuition to anyone who wasn't nobility or other upper class, as long as they or their parents were registered party members, albeit creating his own bullshit caste system in the process. He really was an odd mix of ALT-left and ALT-right ideals. He enacted animal protection laws before they were "cool". The animal rights activists of today are pretty much all leftists. It always struck me as weird that a guy who enacted animal protection laws would also engage in a campaign of ethnic cleansing and genocide against other human beings. I mean think about it, when you call someone "sub-human" you're basically calling them animals. Holy shit am I ever high.

 

[HarperCons]

Not confused, made the point quite succinctly, and don't have to stay on topic to directly respond to your troglodytic, knuckle dragging posts. As for your constant pissing about wikipedia, once again shit head, I've been studying this shit for 45 years now. I've probably forgotten more about it than you ever learned.

did u crap your diaper again?

 

[HarperCons]

Hitler was quite socialist, but only to those were registered members of the NSDAP. For example, much like the rest of Europe, a university education in Germany depended entirely on your social station ie; nobility or other "upper class" twit. Hitler scrapped that bit of caste system bullshit and provided free tuition to anyone who wasn't nobility or other upper class, as long as they or their parents were registered party members, albeit creating his own bullshit caste system in the process. He really was an odd mix of ALT-left and ALT-right ideals. He enacted animal protection laws before they were "cool". The animal rights activists of today are pretty much all leftists. It always struck me as weird that a guy who enacted animal protection laws would also engage in a campaign of ethnic cleansing and genocide against other human beings. I mean think about it, when you call someone "sub-human" you're basically calling them animals. Holy shit am I ever high.

Hitler was definitely no socialist. He did not scrape any caste system, as he believed there were no class antagonisms. Who knows where you got the idea nazi Germany had free tuition from, but universal education started with Frederick II of Prussia. Giving a shit about animals hardly makes one a leftist, libshits also care about animals. Modern Germany still uses some of the animal welfare laws which began under the nazis.
This 'socialism for us, not for thee' attitude you say Hitler had, sounds like how capitalists act today. The ruling elites will certainly share the fruits of workers labor amongst themselves but only crumbs for the actual workers indeed.
Hitler certainly had some leftist rhetoric, but that was only to win the working class, and right-wing shitrats still use leftist rhetoric to this day.

 

[petros]

 

[Jinentonix]

did u crap your diaper again?

You must be smelling your breath blowing back in your face because all you do is spew bullshit.

 

[Jinentonix]

Hitler was definitely no socialist. He did not scrape any caste system, as he believed there were no class antagonisms. Who knows where you got the idea nazi Germany had free tuition from,

Hitler, Speer. And sorry to break it to you but Hitler had a very dim view of the Prussian nobility for the most part. He sure as f*ck didn't trust them either.

Giving a shit about animals hardly makes one a leftist, libshits also care about animals. Modern Germany still uses some of the animal welfare laws which began under the nazis.

And modern Germany is.... farther left than merely liberal.

This 'socialism for us, not for thee' attitude you say Hitler had, sounds like how capitalists act today. The ruling elites will certainly share the fruits of workers labor amongst themselves but only crumbs for the actual workers indeed.

Unlike communism/socialism where the ruling class STEALS the fruits of the workers' labour and at times have left them nothing at all. Do you know how to completely f*ck something up that works at least decently? Put a govt, ANY govt in charge of it instead of private enterprise. Wanna totally f*ck your food production? Let any govt take over and take charge. Wanna take a highly profitable multi-billion dollar company and run it into the red in 6 to 12 months? Let any govt take over. That's a serious problem. And the farther from the political center you get, in either direction, the more govt everyone has in their lives. I will NOT be ruled. I was born in a free country and I will die in a free country. Even if it means I have to defend it in my physically decrepit condition. Dying a free man is still better than living as little more than a serf who's well being is entirely dependent on the mood of their ruler. Human history isn't exactly replete with benevolent dictators.

Hitler certainly had some leftist rhetoric, but that was only to win the working class, and right-wing shitrats still use leftist rhetoric to this day.

Yeah, but not nearly as effectively as you left-wing vermin use it.

 

[HarperCons]

Germany is neo-liberal you halfwit, not leftist.
Communism is where workers keep their fruits of their labour, thats literally the entire ideology of communism you diaper-wearing knuckledragger. Stop typing, you wholly inadequate for this argument.

 

[pgs]

Germany is neo-liberal you halfwit, not leftist.
Communism is where workers keep their fruits of their labour, thats literally the entire ideology of communism you diaper-wearing knuckledragger. Stop typing, you wholly inadequate for this argument.

How to make friends and influence people I one easy lesson .

 

[Jinentonix]

Germany is neo-liberal you halfwit, not leftist.

Whatever you need to tell yourself.

Communism is where workers keep their fruits of their labour, thats literally the entire ideology of communism you diaper-wearing knuckledragger. Stop typing, you wholly inadequate for this argument.

Blah blah blah. Yeah, on paper communism is the purest form of govt. In PRACTICE it has been an UTTER disaster for everyone except the ruling elite. The Soviet Union was a dichotomy of the ruling elite and everyone else. with the everyone else being equally poor and equally oppressed, so at least there's more equality.
China, same shit. The major difference being is China ultimately opened itself up to elements of capitalism and took right off. Flying over the southern and eastern parts of China it looks like a capitalist's wet dream. But ya sure as hell wouldn't want to live there if you didn't have to. And of course it's just so wonderfully great of an ideology that Marxist-based policies in both countries resulted in MILLIONS of deaths from starvation.

Do you know what's inherently wrong with capitalism? No, not that. It's the same curse that plagues communism and every other system. human behaviour. I believe that capitalism is an inherent right. However, like ALL rights, civil and human, there needs to be reasonable limits on that right like there is on every other. Rights also come with personal responsibility. The mistake made is govts have done little to reasonably limit how far capitalists can go to make their fortunes, and I think for the most part the reason is pretty obvious.

Now, as for the "keeping the fruits of their labour" argument, just how much of your fruit are you getting in a socialist country when the govt is taking the majority of your income from you? Not only that but in almost EVERY SINGLE ASPECT, the private sector is more efficient than the public sector in delivering anything.

Do you wanna know what I really think about communism? I think it's a great system for a small community of like-minded people. On the other hand, I think it's a f*cking terrible way to run an entire nation, as has been historically demonstrated country after country after country. The fact that almost every communist country has started off by shoving a totalitarian govt down the people's throats via violence and intimidation is not a good indicator that communism is anything as you keep advertising it. The fact that Marx encourages violence and terrorism as the means to the end is not the least bit encouraging. The fact that twats like you whine about American/Western Imperialism while ignoring 50 years of Soviet Imperialism in Eastern Europe, Afghanistan etc tells me you've been fed a F*CK-TON of high grade horse shit.
The fact that you think Castro is some kind of worker's hero is, well I don't know whether to laugh or shake my head in sympathy of your gross ignorance and piss poor education. It's like seeing Kapernick on TV whining about oppression in his Nikes made by slave/child labour and sporting a Che T-shirt. A man who is hailed as a hero for fighting against US imperialism, while ignoring the Soviet Union's own oppressive Marxist driven imperialism in Eastern Europe and elsewhere, and who ultimately had no use for Black people.

The fact is, you're not a real communist. You're some snot-nosed little punk still living with mommy and daddy looking for something to rebel against. Yep, rebel against the only system that allows anyone to become financially well-off, over a system that has consistently kept everyone equally poor and in far too many cases, oppressed.
I don't give a f*ck about how great communism is on paper or in theory. In practice and reality it has always sucked. Even the more successful attempts at full-on socialism in India and Israel ended with reality catching up to the ideology. In fact, when India said "bye bye" to socialism and adopted capitalism, it resulted in the single largest migration from the lower class to the middle class of any country in history.