You've touched on some real complex issues within your commentary; but in the end - the fact that the whole community (or just about damn near 100%) are in dire straits, that is the problem... So many of the critical questions can/could be answered if a 3rd party audit could be engaged, but that was blocked.
That's the part that screams to me that this is
not a situation in which you choose to make a point 'on principle'. Not when people
are in such dire straits. You help them first, but whatever means are necessary, then you make your points.
While I know that there are always specific issues in a large scale problem that have to be taken into account that don't necessarily translate well this way, I always try to take issues down to a more simple level. In this case, instead of an entire community, take it down to the level of one family. So you have one family where there is no employment, substandard living conditions, no decent education for the kids. What is your first priority? Food, shelter, clothing are the basic needs that must be met before anything else can be accomplished. That should be the same priority on a community level.
What makes this particular situation even more obscene is that there are the optics that a certain, very small segment of that community, not only benefited, but are now leveraging the very people that they exploited to divert the issue and possibly carve-off more benefit in the future..... THAT is what I find criminal in this whole mess (and I use the word ;criminal' very specifically)
Yes, that sickens me as well. Again, whether or not anything untoward was done with community funding (and it's difficult to believe there was nothing given the great disparity in lifestyle) it still comes down to using people when you should be helping them. That is not a leader, not in my book.