Atheist Church of theevolving Human God.
Atheist friends, should youelect a God and sacrifice to him or her?
By doing so, you would beacknowledging that mankind is the greatest force in the universe bysymbolically taking the name of Human God and insuring that there is always a churchthat preaches the truth of what is known as a certainty of the supernatural God.That he probably does not exist and is a man-made mythical ideal perpetuated bythe Noble Lie.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T64_El2s7FU
If you believe what theresearch indicates in terms of hive behavior, then you might wonder as I do ifit would not be in the best interest of the atheist movement to elect anatheist God and sacrifice to him or her?
This, if the research istrue, would insure the longevity and cohesion of the atheist movement and giveit power.
You may have some suggestionfor the title that you would put on your leader and church. I do not except formy choice in the title above. Not being a full atheist, I would not have a voteon it; even as I support atheists and non-supernatural spirituality in peopleover supernatural religious notions and beliefs. I would also suggest a mantrafor this church; that being, --- Faith without Facts is for Fools.
I believe in a strongly assertivetype of atheism that preaches that truth is the highest principle. Thispreaching should be done with eloquence and good form and language; recognizingthe trap of logical fallacies and the impossibility of atheists proving thatthere is no creator God; as well as the impossibility of believers to provethat there is a creator God.
Unfortunately I cannot callmyself an atheist anymore because of having suffered an apotheosis. As anesoteric ecumenist and Gnostic Christian, you will know that I think thatcreating an atheist church should be the next evolutionary step for the atheistmovement. I believe the research shown above to be true and fear that without achurch, atheism will not be affective and perhaps die out without it.
Creating an atheist church wouldbe the ideal for both religionists and atheists. It would insure that atheistsare always here to correct the imaginary thinking of those who believe in amythical supernatural God. This would be a benevolent and altruistic expressionof atheist’s social conscience and desire to bring all people to sane thinking.This atheist church would recognize the human attribute shown in the followingclip and gently try to help those adults whose thinking is hampered by it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vm971ltF44A&feature=related
Atheists seem to already wantto do more for society towards this end as they seem to be over-represented inreligious forums even as statistics say that the atheist in the U. S. andCanada are only at about 5% of the population. This is a sacrifice for atheiststhat already adds some cohesion and longevity to the organization and appeases thehive nature that we seem to have. But I do not think it is enough based on theresearch shown above.
Should atheist electthemselves a Pope or God or someone with some other title and do whateversacrifice is demanded of them to keep the movement alive for the long run?
Regards
DL
Atheist friends, should youelect a God and sacrifice to him or her?
By doing so, you would beacknowledging that mankind is the greatest force in the universe bysymbolically taking the name of Human God and insuring that there is always a churchthat preaches the truth of what is known as a certainty of the supernatural God.That he probably does not exist and is a man-made mythical ideal perpetuated bythe Noble Lie.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T64_El2s7FU
If you believe what theresearch indicates in terms of hive behavior, then you might wonder as I do ifit would not be in the best interest of the atheist movement to elect anatheist God and sacrifice to him or her?
This, if the research istrue, would insure the longevity and cohesion of the atheist movement and giveit power.
You may have some suggestionfor the title that you would put on your leader and church. I do not except formy choice in the title above. Not being a full atheist, I would not have a voteon it; even as I support atheists and non-supernatural spirituality in peopleover supernatural religious notions and beliefs. I would also suggest a mantrafor this church; that being, --- Faith without Facts is for Fools.
I believe in a strongly assertivetype of atheism that preaches that truth is the highest principle. Thispreaching should be done with eloquence and good form and language; recognizingthe trap of logical fallacies and the impossibility of atheists proving thatthere is no creator God; as well as the impossibility of believers to provethat there is a creator God.
Unfortunately I cannot callmyself an atheist anymore because of having suffered an apotheosis. As anesoteric ecumenist and Gnostic Christian, you will know that I think thatcreating an atheist church should be the next evolutionary step for the atheistmovement. I believe the research shown above to be true and fear that without achurch, atheism will not be affective and perhaps die out without it.
Creating an atheist church wouldbe the ideal for both religionists and atheists. It would insure that atheistsare always here to correct the imaginary thinking of those who believe in amythical supernatural God. This would be a benevolent and altruistic expressionof atheist’s social conscience and desire to bring all people to sane thinking.This atheist church would recognize the human attribute shown in the followingclip and gently try to help those adults whose thinking is hampered by it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vm971ltF44A&feature=related
Atheists seem to already wantto do more for society towards this end as they seem to be over-represented inreligious forums even as statistics say that the atheist in the U. S. andCanada are only at about 5% of the population. This is a sacrifice for atheiststhat already adds some cohesion and longevity to the organization and appeases thehive nature that we seem to have. But I do not think it is enough based on theresearch shown above.
Should atheist electthemselves a Pope or God or someone with some other title and do whateversacrifice is demanded of them to keep the movement alive for the long run?
Regards
DL
