Arizona's Immigration Law

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
So being American of Mexican descent is something illegal? Yeah, it's partially racial profiling but taken to an extreme. Now the cops don't have to suspect you of having committed a crime, you just need to look hispanic and they can force you to show papers. Right, nothing wrong with that.
Have you seen the movie Born in East LA?

It's a comedy, it's a movie, but it ain't a joke. It finds its basis in fact.

This is a law that has been long in coming, but in actual fact, it's been enforced long before it was written...;-)
 

wulfie68

Council Member
Mar 29, 2009
2,014
24
38
Calgary, AB
So being American of Mexican descent is something illegal? Yeah, it's partially racial profiling but taken to an extreme. Now the cops don't have to suspect you of having committed a crime, you just need to look hispanic and they can force you to show papers. Right, nothing wrong with that.

No its not illegal but Arizona is inundated with illegal aliens, crossing from Mexico and feels a need to act on it somehow. Again, you seem to be trying to conjure images of totalitarianism with the phrase "force you to show papers" but all you have to do is provide some rudimentary evidence that you are who you say you are and you're free to carry on your merry way.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
The point is, you are not legally obligated to carry ID unless you are driving a car or requiring a government service of some sort under most circumstances. One should not be punished for exercising their rights.

Aren't there situations where common sense trumps rights?
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
No its not illegal but Arizona is inundated with illegal aliens, crossing from Mexico and feels a need to act on it somehow. Again, you seem to be trying to conjure images of totalitarianism with the phrase "force you to show papers" but all you have to do is provide some rudimentary evidence that you are who you say you are and you're free to carry on your merry way.

I'm not conjuring up images of a totalitarian regime. The fact is, as a citizen, one is not required to carry ID and should not have to out of fear of fitting a stereotype of an illegal alien.
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
Aren't there situations where common sense trumps rights?

In some cases, sure. In my case, I carry only a work ID, credit card & bank card because that is what I use on a daily basis and I have never needed more then that in the past 10 years. If am doing something other then my daily commute, I tend to bring my wallet.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
I'm not conjuring up images of a totalitarian regime. The fact is, as a citizen, one is not required to carry ID and should not have to out of fear of fitting a stereotype of an illegal alien.
This is true...but sadly the state of things has reached the point where the citizens have been forced to push back.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Well, it will be interesting to see how it plays out, regardless.
This too is true, and I hope to see it played out with democracy in mind.

Civil liberties have overdrawn at the moral ethical bank for to long. It's time to pay service charges. And the tax payers seem resistant to footing the bill.
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
This too is true, and I hope to see it played out with democracy in mind.

Civil liberties have overdrawn at the moral ethical bank for to long. It's time to pay service charges. And the tax payers seem resistant to footing the bill.

If anything, this should light a fire under the arse of the Federal Government, who should be dealing with the lax border to begin with.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
In some cases, sure. In my case, I carry only a work ID, credit card & bank card because that is what I use on a daily basis and I have never needed more then that in the past 10 years. If am doing something other then my daily commute, I tend to bring my wallet.

If you are sure you are not going to get into a situation where you wished you had more I.D. then I'd say go for it and good luck..........:smile:
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
If anything, this should light a fire under the arse of the Federal Government, who should be dealing with the lax border to begin with.
To be honest, I can't see them doing anything less than what Arizona already has. Anything less is just window dressing in my books.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Well, they could properly fortify the border methinks, fill in the gaps.
Dude! These people are determined. I've met a kid, who actually crossed the Rio Grande at the tender age of 13. He made it all the way to Canada on his own.

You can't stop that kind of desperate determination. I admire it on its merits though.
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
Having to carry citizenship papers sounds rather gestaposih to me. I can understand a non-citizen immigrant having papers to prove they are in the country legally but expecting the same of citizens, particularity citizen of a certain skin hue seems rather discriminatory.

How else would they differentiate between illegal immigrants and illegal immigrants without seeing papers,
what is another way.

People want the problem addressed, but don't want the
problem addressed. If I was a different race, one that
is included in this problem, I would be glad to show my
papers anytime, no different than showing a valid drivers
licence when stopped. If one has no reason to feel guilty,
then show your papers and be happy you have them.
We all carry many cards which identify certain things about us,
not a problem to carry one more that states you are a legal citizen.
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
How else would they differentiate between illegal immigrants and illegal immigrants without seeing papers,
what is another way.

That's where the dilemma lays, how do you enforce this law without violating citizens rights? Obviously the state hasn't figured that out and the courts system will have to decide for them at some point.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
30% of the population of Arizona is of Hispanic ancestry. There are elections in about six months. Interestingly enough election information in Arizona is given in both English and Spanish. If the party that passed this bill is still in power after November 2, then Arizonans deserve the sort of moronic government it already has.

Arizona has a well deserved, well established reputation as the state of morons. Arizona was the last state to recognize the MLK holiday; it got plenty of flack for that. It was reviled nationwide as a racist state, boycotts were arranged. After it suffered plenty of ridicule and lost plenty of revenue as a result of boycotts, Arizona finally decided to recognize the holiday.

As I recall, Arizona even lost the Super bowl due to MLK holiday flap. That must have really hurt, I think Super bowl generates revenues of 100 or 200 million $ for the host state.

But Arizona has a reputation for a wacky, racist state. It has been here before.

As one blogger remarked. it is difficult to make Texas look respectable, but Arizona manages that.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Having to carry citizenship papers sounds rather gestaposih to me. I can understand a non-citizen immigrant having papers to prove they are in the country legally but expecting the same of citizens, particularity citizen of a certain skin hue seems rather discriminatory.

Quite so. Besides, who are they going to ask to pull over? Do you think they are going to ask a blue eyed blonde, or that white man in a three piece business suit to pull over and show papers? Not a chance. All the people pulled over will be brown skinned. This is a purely racist legislation; there is no getting around it.

There are ways of passing racist, sexist legislation without actually mentioning race or sex. In the old days, they wanted to exclude women from most professions. So they would advertise for police, firemen etc. with the condition that applicant must be at least 6 feet tall. That effectively kept women out, made sure that only men will apply.

It is the same here. The legislation is purely racist in nature, since we all know that only brown skinned, Hispanics will be pulled over and harassed.

This is another example of the majority putting limits on the rights of the minority, sadly a frequent occurrence in USA (as is demonstrated by gay marriage referendums).