Re: RE: Anti-Americanism is madness, says Blair.
im well aware of your point
nowadays its more complex so outright invasion isnt always required
various stragtegies can be employed
yes- capital-- specifically buying off corrupt foreign leaders to do the empires bidding
propaganda thru mass media-- the nazis started that -- its been fined tuned since
covert military involvement- ie the infamous right wing death squads of central america
the iran-- contra type of thing to bypass a democratic senate that might prevent foreign intervention
and of course outright war
a special type though
massive arial bombardment
shock and awe
a modern variant of
blitzkreig-- is often a key component
---- all these surely not uniquely american
just to make the point that empires evolve in complexity
employing newer more subtle mechanisms of preventing local the local populace from controlling their own just destiny -- in ADDITION to the old methods...
for example where you have imperialism -- you have resistance and one method the empire always uses at some point is TORTURE-- weve seen that in vietnam-- projeect phoenix-- the french in north africa, the british-- all over -- weve seen it in abu graib-- theres probably at lot more of it going on than we know...
c est la meme chose
it is what it is if you dont wanna call it imperialism call it bob or joe or sister mary-- or better yet call it freedom-------
war is peace
jimmoyer said:I would rather the grand US military imperialist adventure TOTALLY fail, if only for my friends in the US.. fail SO BADLY that some serious reconsideration may even be required, ....
---------------------------mabudon--------------------------
It's more important to them that America fails, than
for Iraq to succeed as a viable peaceful nation.
-----------------jimmoyer's response to mabudon----------
i think the point of the post was that if american fails---
it might reconsider its policy of pre-emptive strike-- and choose another more productive strategy
imperialism - is not something i believe most americans want their country to participate in
----------------cortez response to jimmoyer--------------
I guess Cortez, the old definition of Imperialism meant
you conquered a country and then governed it and
owned it outright.
The new definition of Imperialism is the ownership
of Capitalism through world trade.
Doesn't seem like such a stretch to people like Cortez
but in reality it was brutally a world of difference.
I'm not sure Cortez can go beyond that subtlety
to see a further subtlety as he predictably will challenge
this point.
im well aware of your point
nowadays its more complex so outright invasion isnt always required
various stragtegies can be employed
yes- capital-- specifically buying off corrupt foreign leaders to do the empires bidding
propaganda thru mass media-- the nazis started that -- its been fined tuned since
covert military involvement- ie the infamous right wing death squads of central america
the iran-- contra type of thing to bypass a democratic senate that might prevent foreign intervention
and of course outright war
a special type though
massive arial bombardment
shock and awe
a modern variant of
blitzkreig-- is often a key component
---- all these surely not uniquely american
just to make the point that empires evolve in complexity
employing newer more subtle mechanisms of preventing local the local populace from controlling their own just destiny -- in ADDITION to the old methods...
for example where you have imperialism -- you have resistance and one method the empire always uses at some point is TORTURE-- weve seen that in vietnam-- projeect phoenix-- the french in north africa, the british-- all over -- weve seen it in abu graib-- theres probably at lot more of it going on than we know...
c est la meme chose
it is what it is if you dont wanna call it imperialism call it bob or joe or sister mary-- or better yet call it freedom-------
war is peace