35 years too late! I remember that incident like it was yesterday.
B.C. kidnap sex criminal dies in hospital - British Columbia - CBC News
B.C. kidnap sex criminal dies in hospital - British Columbia - CBC News
They caught him with the girl.. put him in general population and let jail house justice keep care of this sub-human piece of sh!t. He would have been dead long ago, and the tax payers better off for it.
any other people you consider a drain on the taxpayers and would be better off dead? Old? Invalid?Mentally deficient?
They have to work for their room and board in the loonie bin. 8 hrs a day, 5 days a week. He didn't cost much to house at all.Shame he didn't die sooner. Could have saved the taxpayer a boatload.
They have to work for their room and board in the loonie bin. 8 hrs a day, 5 days a week. He didn't cost much to house at all.
They have to work for their room and board in the loonie bin. 8 hrs a day, 5 days a week. He didn't cost much to house at all.
Do you think "old, invalid, mentally deficient" are on a par with this son of a bitch?
All cost taxpayers money.
Yes, but not all are violent killers or child rapists.. Christ, you are defending a Child Rapist. WTF!!
( (( shaking head )) )
I'm for the death penalty, but when I really think about it, spending the rest of their days locked
up, in my opinion is worse for them. Killing them isn't cheaper, it takes years to finally pull
the switch, but when they have to stay confined for their lives, they have to feel sorry for themselves,
try constantly to justify what they did, blame others, not a nice existence, and i'm sure they are
'very' popular with other inmates too, so they have to worry about that as well.
Yup, stay in jail and rot, more cruel than killing them, that is too quick and final, then their
troubles are over, and they shouldn't be.
Killing them just satisfies 'us', but it lets them off the hook too soon.
Killing them isn't cheaper....
Jeez...:roll: Where did I defend any killer or rapist? I'm just not willing to lower myself to their level and kill someone, unlike you and JLM.[/QUOTE]
Actually Gerry, that is not quite true, I'm more against the death penalty than for it. The exceptions being only those who do muliple homicides (usually children) or where there is substantiating evidence such as D.N.A. and horrendous cruelty such as the bastard who killed Tori Stafford & the likes of Robert Pickton. Definitely not for the run or the mill offender where things got away from him in a drunken bar room brawl or who commits murder while finding his wife doing some "entertaining". You have to read more carefully, Gerry!
Actually Gerry, that is not quite true, I'm more against the death penalty than for it. The exceptions being only those who do muliple homicides (usually children) or where there is substantiating evidence such as D.N.A. and horrendous cruelty such as the bastard who killed Tori Stafford & the likes of Robert Pickton. Definitely not for the run or the mill offender where things got away from him in a drunken bar room brawl or who commits murder while finding his wife doing some "entertaining". You have to read more carefully, Gerry!
It won't bring the victims back,but wasting crapload of money keeping them in jail is i think an insult to the victims families.It is completely true, and your answer above reinforces that truth.
Tell me JLM, will killing pickton, or mclintic, or raferty bring back Tori or those women from the pig farm? If not, then why should society sink to the murders level? What does it accomplish? Or is vengeance that important to you?