and i never refer to america as an empire. i don't refer to the decline as something that suddenly occurs because a texan shrub become president. I see it as a part of the cycle of the system, and all societies have displayed the same major parts of that lifecycle (unique to its own conditions). I know you are thinking that this is the "sudden fall" scenario often played out, but i am not talking about a collapse within our lifetimes, but that the roots of change (which means the collapse of the current system) are already beginning. As i said though, it is not unique to the US, and for the comparisons to rome to be accurate the US would not need to become an empire (moving from republic to empire is a matter of semantics, it is the actual deep happenings that matter)
rome is a good example for comparison, but perhaps it would be best to look at the patterns of the rise and fall of all societies to better see what is happening in america?
edit:
the adoption of christianity as the state religion (or should i say the creation of it by the council of constinople?) was a major factor in the fall of the empire, yet christianity has been in america since its beginning so we can't use the creation/adoption/enforcement of religion as a symptom of decline in the US currently. This is an example of how the superficial is not what we need to use in making these comparisons.
rome is a good example for comparison, but perhaps it would be best to look at the patterns of the rise and fall of all societies to better see what is happening in america?
edit:
the adoption of christianity as the state religion (or should i say the creation of it by the council of constinople?) was a major factor in the fall of the empire, yet christianity has been in america since its beginning so we can't use the creation/adoption/enforcement of religion as a symptom of decline in the US currently. This is an example of how the superficial is not what we need to use in making these comparisons.