Gores hidden agenda, that's funny. Like the Republicans have a clear conscience after the last seven years.
LinkGLOBAL TRAUMANING
A friend’s young daughter came home from school the other day in tears, having been told by a visiting academic that her North Sydney suburb would one day be flooded due to global warming. Alarmed, her father called the school, which confirmed - with regret - the comments made. This child abuse is happening all over the place:
• A Toronto girl was reportedly unable to sleep after seeing An Inconvenient Truth;
• Nine-year-old Sydney boy Ryan Gwin suffers anxiety over the fuel consumed by his father’s bus;
• And another nine-year-old, Virginia’s Alex Hendel, fears the end of life on the earth.
Well done, global warm-mongers. You’ve got kids terrified out of their minds:
While recent polls show that American adults are most concerned about the war in Iraq, terrorism, and healthcare, a survey of more than 1,000 middle school students across the country found that kids fear global warming more than any of these issues ...Note that adults aren’t scared of global warming; the “scientific consensus” on global warming seems mostly to worry that sector of the population generally frightened of boogeymen and the dark.
Nearly 60 percent of children said they feared global warming and environmental disasters - such as hurricanes, tornados and flooding - more than terrorism, car crashes, and even cancer.
Nearly one-third of children reported thinking about global warming a lot and worrying about how the effects of global warming will change the planet and directly impact their lives. Another 41.2 percent think about it sometimes and say that they are somewhat worried ...They think people will die. Nice. The survey’s sponsors seem satisfied with these results:
When asked what effect of global warming worries them the most, the majority of kids surveyed are most afraid of the toll it will take on the lives of people.
"We were not surprised in our survey to discover that children are really worried about global warming. We have received thousands of emails from children expressing their fears and asking what they could do to help save the planet,” said BrainPOP CEO and founder Avraham Kadar, M.D.Keep telling them that sea-floor earthquakes and historically-constant hurricanes are the result of man’s evil ways; see what levels of misery you can induce. Meanwhile, those who earn $50,000 for alarmist speeches are comfortable and relaxed:
"Given the media attention from things like Hurricane Katrina and the tsunamis in Asia, it’s no wonder that children are curious and concerned about the impact of global warming.”
Environmentalist Tim Flannery munches on a club sandwich in a suburban Sydney shopping mall and casually begins predicting Armageddon.I’ve got two young nieces in the Victorian school system, Flannery. Stay the hell away from them.
You should read more; that way you won't show your ignorance. http://www.on.ec.gc.ca/greatlakes/How_are_the_Lakes_doing_-WS79153237-1_En.htmI sure am glad we haven't ruined the planet yet- too bad despite "global warming theory" getting "shot full of holes" our planets is turning into a poisonous cesspool. Go take a long cool sip of Lake Ontario
There you go, twisting things around again and attacking a strawman. It isn't whether there is or isn't global warming, it's whether the cause is anthropological or not. Climate change is a given;everyone believes in it. It's the cause that we're arguing about.
Yeah, frightening kids is a real good thing.
Who is keeping the debate of global warming alive?
The documentary shows how fossil fuel corporations have kept the global warming debate alive long after most scientists believed that global warming was real and had potentially catastrophic consequences. It shows that companies such as Exxon Mobil are working with top public relations firms and using many of the same tactics and personnel as those employed by Phillip Morris and RJ Reynolds to dispute the cigarette-cancer link in the 1990s. Exxon Mobil sought out those willing to question the science behind climate change, providing funding for some of them, their organizations and their studies.
I'll assume that most of the flat-earthers agree with the errors found by the judge in this case, but do you agree with what else he said......?
claims made by the film were fully backed up by the weight of science. He identified “four main scientific hypotheses, each of which is very well supported by research published in respected, peer-reviewed journals and accords with the latest conclusions of the IPCC”.
In particular, he agreed with the main thrust of Mr Gore’s arguments: “That climate change is mainly attributable to man-made emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide (‘greenhouse gases’).”
The other three main points accepted by the judge were that global temperatures are rising and are likely to continue to rise, that climate change will cause serious damage if left unchecked, and that it is entirely possible for governments and individuals to reduce its impacts.
Of course I would agree with some of what the Judge had to say...
Would you agree that Che was a great man for what he and his legacy achieved in Latin America?
So then you agree with the science behind climate change as stated by the judge? Good, now action can be taken.....what next?
You're wrong again young lad, I disagree with much of the science and all of the hype behind the AGW theory. Like I said in the post you quoted...
Some being the key word.CDNBear said:Of course I would agree with some of what the Judge had to say...
No you posted an article about Che, you didn't actually leave behind any of your feelings on the man.I posted something about Che today, I think that speaks for itself.
I'm very curious as to whether or not you adore him, as you do Gore and Suzuki. Che's outward message was about the common man and that is the biggest and most prolific part of his legacy. Seeing as you have turned a blind eye to Gore's blatant BS, lies, environmental profitiering and hypocracies, do you feel the same about Che?
So then you agree with the science behind climate change as stated by the judge? Good, now action can be taken.....what next?
You're wrong again young lad, I disagree with much of the science and all of the hype behind the AGW theory. Like I said in the post you quoted...
Some being the key word.
No you posted an article about Che, you didn't actually leave behind any of your feelings on the man.
I'm very curious as to whether or not you adore him, as you do Gore and Suzuki. Che's outward message was about the common man and that is the biggest and most prolific part of his legacy. Seeing as you have turned a blind eye to Gore's blatant BS, lies, environmental profitiering and hypocracies, do you feel the same about Che?
What are the some considering you believe all of the criticisms?
Where did I say I adored Gore or Suzuki for that matter?
Che was a commie, I don't like commies.
What are the some considering you believe all of the criticisms?
The other three main points accepted by the judge were that global temperatures are rising and are likely to continue to rise, that climate change will cause serious damage if left unchecked, and that it is entirely possible for governments and individuals to reduce its impacts.
I must have misunderstood your fevered support for adoration...I thin k I read a comment by you not that long ago, about how Suzuki was a great man, non?Where did I say I adored Gore or Suzuki for that matter?
But you support poluters, hypocrites, liars, profitiers...hmmm, odd.Che was a commie, I don't like commies.
[/b]
Gore has actually done nothing but spread hype.
Hmmm, how very odd.
[/b]
I must have misunderstood your fevered support for adoration...I thin k I read a comment by you not that long ago, about how Suzuki was a great man, non?
But you support poluters, hypocrites, liars, profitiers...hmmm, odd.
Gore has actually done nothing but spread hype, true enough many have caught the environmental bug from his advocacy, but Che has done more to free people from capitalist enslavement then Gore has actually achieved for the environment or mankind for that matter.
Hmmm, how very odd.
As I thought...Like I said good, stop fighting to maintain the status quo on pollution and help instead.
I like the message Gore and Suzuki send in that it helps the eviromental movement in cleaning up our planet even if you don't buy the climate change causes you should at least recognize that. Furthermore it's not something these two picked up on a political whim like many do, it is a combined effort of half a century. It took a movie with the same a sort of shock and awe to get us off our collective arses and do something about what we have done and continue to do. I was a flat earther at one point and really couldn't care less about it but movies like Gore's and work my sister has done has convinced me otherwise.
Hey, if you like Che so much, move to Cuba.
As I thought...
Political ideological hypocracy at its best.
It's like telling a funny joke to someone that just doesn't get it...How so?
It's like telling a funny joke to someone that just doesn't get it...
If you have to explain it, they still won't get it. Though they may laugh, you just know they don't won't you to think they're buggered.
[/b]
Gore has actually done nothing but spread hype, true enough many have caught the environmental bug from his advocacy