Perhaps if you weren't new and had been around and seen some of Avro's comments against natives, you'ld understand my conclusions about the context of his posts.i've seen lots of forums where a quick insult is to accuse them of being drunk or on drugs. maybe the fact that you saw a racial slur says something of your own 'racism'
Besides, calling me "chief" and suggesting I should be "getting drunk" that is.
I never claimed any differently.Yes in the case of Tim Ball it could be the same thing as you said, what is he suppose to do, morgage his home. Nope, instead he can deny climate change caused by man and get money from big oil. what a shock, he has a vested interest.
Especaillly when you ignore ones malicious intent and embrace anothers.Oh what a tangled web we weave.:lol:
Yep, loud and clear.Do you even hear what you say?
You shouldn't do otherwise.Again both are ad hominim attacks and have no place in the debate but if others question Gores motives I will question the deniers motives.
Not at all, you have obviously missed most of my posts on this subject in this and the other thread.Interesting how you attack a message that is bringing real evironmental change and action to do just that.
So long as profitting from the hysteria you create is not your motive. I'm not sure Gore's motives are all that altruistic. He has no issues with a mine on his land poluting adnauseum, he owns a carbon trading compnay and he hypes the AGW to boot.The means justify the ends.
The optics there say alot about his motives to me.