What does the big giant font do for ya?What a shock, you didn't even get it.:roll:
Is this some fruedian thing or are you just melting down?
What does the big giant font do for ya?What a shock, you didn't even get it.:roll:
What does the big giant font do for ya?
Is this some fruedian thing or are you just melting down?
True. I have poor eyesight so I write in a bigger font and it's easier for me to read other posts if they are also in a bigger font.Walt seems to like it.
True. I have poor eyesight so I write in a bigger font and it's easier for me to read other posts if they are also in a bigger font.
Would that be Stalin or Mao, who caused the deaths of tens of millions in their respective countries?
Something I already knew, most people stuck in the stone age have difficulty seeing.
I'll keep it up for you old boy.
Man...now you're just being annoying...What the hell does that have to do with this?
Is this some weird defence of Hitler?
Um avro, I think walter might be saying he actually has a vision problem.Something I already knew, most people stuck in the stone age have difficulty seeing.
I'll keep it up for you old boy.
Man...now you're just being annoying...
Give it a rest already.
Is that just more assinine racist blather?Shouldn't you be getting drunk right about now?
I'm not arguing the message, I'm arguing his motives, his delivery and his ethics
Thanx...Nice to see you back BigBear.![]()
It's quite difficult not to, especialy when the messenger is so full of shyte and so hypocritically corrupt.Don't shoot the messenger son! How many grifters are there in Washington?
Unfortunetly, I'm not that scientifically inclind, I'm waiting for someone I trust to spoon feed the answers to me, lol...It's of little use to bicker over personality flaws while such important matters are at hand. If in fact it's an altruistic mission you're on to spread the light of truth about then where are the corrections to the statements he's made?
Not if that is the true spirit of your intent. No.I know that, I'm giving him a hand, is there a problem with this?
Is that just more assinine racist blather?
Or has talking out your a$$ become the norm for your debating style now?
So resorting to racial slurs is now an appropriate form of debate?Just a question chief.
Debating on a forum is largely useless, so, may as well have some fun.
Thanx...
It's quite difficult not to, especialy when the messenger is so full of shyte and so hypocritically corrupt.
Blind eye to the polution from the mine on his land...
His power consuption...
His profiting from the hysteria he helped propogate...
and so on...
Unfortunetly, I'm not that scientifically inclind, I'm waiting for someone I trust to spoon feed the answers to me, lol...
That goes both ways...especially when the messenger is profitiering from the hysteria.The law is the law, if it was that bad he would be shut down.
The point is that he still is doing something about a problem by making people aware. While some like yourself have said he is full of it, there are no shortage of trusted and well informed scientists and others who back up what he has said.
That there are a few who say he's full of it and all wrong and a big fat liar isn't difficult to find. Big Tobacco had scientists that said that there was no way that smoking caused cancer and that nicotine wasn't addictive.
But they for the most part changed their view when presented with immunity from prosecution for breach of confidentiality and being kicked off the payroll.
It's easy to say someone is wrong, but all together different to show conclusively where and how.