Afghanistan - Time to leave

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Everyone should have left when Bin Laden was killed. The reason for being there was gone after that.

After he escaped, thanks to Rumsfeld for screwing that up. The Commander on the Ground wanted troops to close one exit off. Rumsfeld denied it, left the NA ragtag to do that. 50 k bribe, dressed as a woman, gonzo.
 

Count_Lothian

Time Out
Apr 6, 2014
793
0
16
There never was a will to win. There was never any plan at all. Nobody seems to know why we went there in the first place.

Don't be ridiculous. You can disagree with why, even argue that it was wrong, but everyone knows why we went there.

Don't try any of that Caspian sea New World Order bullsh!t on me.

I saw the aftermath of 911, stood on the shore and watched the smoke rise out of Manhattan, saw the faces of the people and just because the will of men who have no honour, or meddle, or integrity chose to pervert the reasons afterward does not change why we went there.
Seeing this on the front page I read it and loled.
Yes Cliffy know one with any sense knows why we went there. Except when you realize there was no exit strategy and the amount of time it went on for , it was just part and parcel to the military economy, and CIA reaping the benefits of Opium. not unlike Yankee traders did at the end of the British run on this with their Tea for opium fortunes.

It had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11 for in the end if it did and real intelligence was being listened to on the subject we would not be here today with ISIS running rampnat in Iraq and the entire African continent and mid east mired in terrorists.

It was a place where fortunes could be made by CIA with opium. it went from 45% of the world production to under the guise of CIA, 95%

maybe if we took this to heart

Donovan - Universal Soldier - YouTube
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
When Bush was asked, why did you invade Iraq? He replied - because nobody stopped him.

Same with Obama - nobody stopped him.



IIRC, it took him only three days to bail out Wall Street and three months to expand the war. Had I been in the White House, it would have taken me three seconds to tell the elites in Wall Street to go to hell and another three minutes to sign an order to bring the troops home from Afghanistan and Iraq.
 

Spade

Ace Poster
Nov 18, 2008
12,822
49
48
11
Aether Island
Why did Obama escalate the war in Afghanistan? Any ideas?

You must be referring to the "Good War" as opposed to Bush's bad war in Iraq?
In Canada, we had an Independent committee figuring out and presenting to us Canknucleheads reasons why we were there.
 

TurkRugger

Time Out
Jun 6, 2014
19
0
1
The Taliban are too dedicated a force for any outside force to effectively keep control of that country.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
The Taliban are too dedicated a force for any outside force to effectively keep control of that country.

The only thing that works is having soldiers that are a dedicated to dying as the Taliban are.


Then many have said the State could divide along tribal lines- North V South
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
The Taliban are too dedicated a force for any outside force to effectively keep control of that country.



Reagan wasn't kidding when he equated their predecessors with our Founding Fathers - nobody was able to stop them because they are fighting for their country from foreign domination. That may not be a politically correct view for right wingers but the facts clearly establish this as fact.
 

WLDB

Senate Member
Jun 24, 2011
6,182
0
36
Ottawa
After he escaped, thanks to Rumsfeld for screwing that up. The Commander on the Ground wanted troops to close one exit off. Rumsfeld denied it, left the NA ragtag to do that. 50 k bribe, dressed as a woman, gonzo.

Was that the thing that happened in 2001-02? I remember reading they came very close to getting him but the people on the ground didn't get the support they needed to catch him.

Why did Obama escalate the war in Afghanistan? Any ideas?

He thinks he can succeed where everyone else failed. If thats the reason, he's probably wrong.

The Taliban are too dedicated a force for any outside force to effectively keep control of that country.

Not just them. Even if you totally wipe them out there are still dozens of tribal war lords controlling most of the country. They aren't exactly friendly. Even the Taliban never had full control of the country when they were 'in power.'
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Having a prolonged war is a lot more profitable than capturing and killing the s.o.b. right up front. Small wonder why traitor Bush let him go.

Myself I do not go along with that.
The cost for Iraq is now at 1.7 Trillion. Afghanistan will not be far behind.
By the time the final tally comes along it will be closer to 5 Trillion.

Did you miss my post on who ramped up Korea and Vietnam?
Both Dems and Repubs have enough blood on their hands.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Your point about Korea & Vietnam is valid but I doubt your point about Afghanistan.

Bush's campaign to save federal expenditures by increasing deregulation and privatizing airport security is what led to the hijackings which caused 9/11. We saw no such thing during Clinton's years as he was not willing to compromise our security in order to give the appearance of shrinking the government. Ironically, Bush (the less government advocate) expanded the government and spent more money by creating TSA.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Your point about Korea & Vietnam is valid but I doubt your point about Afghanistan.

Bush's campaign to save federal expenditures by increasing deregulation and privatizing airport security is what led to the hijackings which caused 9/11. We saw no such thing during Clinton's years as he was not willing to compromise our security in order to give the appearance of shrinking the government. Ironically, Bush (the less government advocate) expanded the government and spent more money by creating TSA.

What was the voting record on this? Aside from Kerry before he was for it then against it. or was it the other way??

if i recall correctly prior to Iraq, 2 journalists in the mid west were listing the problems with the lintel and the WH propaganda.
They were derided nation wide by Dems & Repubs and their peers as well. They got it right.
i think it was Colorado.

Do not get held ransom by a party line.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
What was the voting record on this? Aside from Kerry before he was for it then against it. or was it the other way??

if i recall correctly prior to Iraq, 2 journalists in the mid west were listing the problems with the lintel and the WH propaganda.
They were derided nation wide by Dems & Repubs and their peers as well. They got it right.
i think it was Colorado.

Do not get held ransom by a party line.


See what I mean Goobs?
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Time to leave Afghanistan & Iraq and to stay the hell out of Syria:


http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/27/w...on&region=bottom-well&WT.nav=bottom-well&_r=0


Mr. Obama’s request calls for the Pentagon to “train and equip vetted elements of the Syrian armed opposition to help defend the Syrian people, stabilize areas under opposition control, facilitate the provision of essential services, counter terrorist threats and promote conditions for a negotiated settlement.”






It's none of our business - let them settle it themselves.