Abortion -The poll is not based upon Religious belief - It is based ethics

[BornRuff]

You have human hair but not hair of a human?

Neither of those statements imply that the hairs are themselves humans(noun).

 

[petros]

Neither of those statements imply that the hairs are themselves human(noun).

You aren't human? Thanks for letting me know. It explains plenty.

 

[gerryh]

They are fetuses.

You can refer to the adjective vs noun post above if you want.

They are human fetuses, just like I have human hair on my head, but neither the hairs on my head or fetuses are humans(as in the noun).

of course not, whatever helps you sleep at night.

 

[petros]

Yes. Now your turn. Show us the law you are talking about.

What did I tell about getting off you fat lazy a$s and looking things up on your own. If you want me to hold your hand through the process you're going to have to buy me dinner and take me to a movie.

of course not, whatever helps you sleep at night.

Sweetheart hasn't learned about fetal rights and the laws regarding fetal abuse.

 

[BornRuff]

You aren't human? Thanks for letting me know. It explains plenty.

For someone who was just commenting on my reading comprehension, you really need to look in the mirror.

"You have human hair"

You are using human as an adjective here.

"but not hair of a human"

You are using human as a noun here to refer to actual humans, as in me or you.

In neither case are you using human as a noun to refer to the hair itself.

What did I tell about getting off you fat lazy a$s and looking things up on your own. If you want me to hold your hand through the process you're going to have to buy me dinner and take me to a movie.

Because you made a claim, you have to substantiate it.

Also because I am 100% sure that there is no law that defines ears as human beings. I can`t read or show you something that doesn't exist.

Sweetheart hasn't learned about fetal rights and the laws regarding fetal abuse.

Does it define them as humans? Is one of those rights not to be aborted? Exactly what law are you referring to and how does it apply here?

 

[petros]

Nobody claimed ears were humans or hair were humans or you were human. Why don't you ask the others in your head what was written and what you imagined you read. Maybe they can help?

 

[BornRuff]

Nobody claimed ears were humans or hair were humans or you were human. Why don't you ask the others in your head what was written and what you imagined you read. Maybe they can help?

Umm....

They define something you falsely called tumours and parasites as human. Ears included.

 

[gerryh]

Umm....

ummmm..ya..... read what he wrote.... try it without your biases.

 

[BornRuff]

ummmm..ya..... read what he wrote.... try it without your biases.

I went to great lengths to get him to clarify what he meant. He has declined to do so.

If he is just using "human" as an adjective, what is the point of posting that?

 

[petros]

Umm...

That's all you have to say about your stupid mistake?

 

[BornRuff]

That's all you have to say about your stupid mistake?

It must be so frustrating to you to always believe so strongly that you are right, but have zero ability to explain why.

 

[petros]

I went to great lengths to get him to clarify what he meant. He has declined to do so.

If he is just using "human" as an adjective, what is the point of posting that?

You lied to me. You can't read and can't comprehend what you read.

 

[BornRuff]

You lied to me. You can't read and can't comprehend what you read.

It must be so frustrating to you to always believe so strongly that you are right, but have zero ability to explain why.

 

[gerryh]

It must be so frustrating to you to always believe so strongly that you are right, but have zero ability to explain why.

He is right, you did lie about being able to comprehend what he wrote. It's been hilarious watching you go round and round and round.

 

[BornRuff]

He is right, you did lie about being able to comprehend what he wrote. It's been hilarious watching you go round and round and round.

It must be so frustrating to you to always believe so strongly that you are right, but have zero ability to explain why.

 

[petros]

It was very clear. You'd think one of the people in his head would get it but no...

 

[gerryh]

It must be so frustrating to you to always believe so strongly that you are right, but have zero ability to explain why.

Not up to me to teach you basic English comprehension skills. Maybe you should have paid more attention in school to those that got paid to teach you.

 

[petros]

It must be so frustrating to you to always believe so strongly that you are right, but have zero ability to explain why.

It's all there Dumb****. Why do you do this to yourselves?

 

[BornRuff]

Not up to me to teach you basic English comprehension skills. Maybe you should have paid more attention in school to those that got paid to teach you.

It must be so frustrating to you to always believe so strongly that you are right, but have zero ability to explain why.

 

[petros]

Not up to me to teach you basic English comprehension skills. Maybe you should have paid more attention in school to those that got paid to teach you.

Mercy passes. Pass the problem off to the next teacher.

It must be so frustrating to you to always believe so strongly that you are right, but have zero ability to explain why.

Go find your mistake instead of arguing you read it right the first time.