A brief thought of fundamental basis in Physics.

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Electricity prevents the darkness. There is nowhere not controlled and contained by the electric force. Dark matter was invented to displace electrical theory, it failed there are no dark matter batteries, matches, bottles. You are in the dark too deep to see any light. We can appreciate a spark while a dark spot escapes our cognition. There is no empty space, it,s full to the brim. None of us can encompass its content. Only the originator can grasp the entirety . Of course I am subject to constant revision as the path unfolds before me, usually minor adjustments during the less than warm comfortable conditions for adjustment; I can change my mind, but the transition depends on the transmission and clutch, friction, my wheels demand powers and dark matter ain,t on the list. Being of material construction I inherently appreciate solid chunks of stuff interacting with my manifested presence.I can,t eat an idea with meatless bones. There is no such thing as dark matter, period. There is the dark though. It isn,t empty however, if you step into the dark for a bit you see, after a bit. The dark is not invisable, is it? Seeing nothing is certainly possible.
 
Last edited:

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
The fundamental basis in philosophy of science.
Modern philosophy of science says:
a) 27% of matter in the universe is dark-matter
(we have no idea what it is )
b) 68% of energy in the universe is dark-energy
(we have no idea what it is )
c) there are many black-holes
(we have no idea how many they are )
d) ≈ 5% of matter in the universe is normal-matter
( we don't know everything about this normal-matter)
#
That is our so called ''philosophical knowledge''
Welcome to the era of precision ignorance.


We hu,.mans must comprehend the scope of our ignorance, it is bottomless and will remain so. Why, because it,s a very big universe and we a re a very little ripple in the tides of time. Enjoy now cuz tomorrow don,t exist. Tomorrow is a theoretical construckt. A construct of some ther]oretical signifigance, we suppose. And the bills pile up.
Our real value is our tax burden..... We have worth based on our debt. That ain,t right and my sword will correct your misintepretation of my value. start the war, the enemy is naked and can be crushed the good old way. The rotten pricks in the counting houses. Baby eating bastards they look human but they are not we will submit them to the test, if they fail, off with thier heads.Your gold will get you nothing when I want bread.
 
Last edited:

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
precision ignorance., is the engine of the future, baked in a a pie full of virtual fruit for virtual people however the test is in the taste and pseudo meat won,t pass. Only bleeding meat counts. Don,t gimme no trans food, I won,t bite.
 

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,158
18
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
Strings -- Music of the Spheres / Musica universalis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musica_universalis
===
Pythagoras created the theory ''Harmony of the Spheres''
The spirit of Pythagoras idea went into Kepler's thinking
and in 1619 he published ''Harmonices Mundi''
( harmonies of musical intervals describe the motions of the planets )
#
The connection between music, mathematics, and astronomy
had a profound impact on history.
To continue this profound tradition modern physicists created
musical tools ( similar to known violin or guitar strings)
by name ''String Particles'' ( open and closed) in the hope
to hear the harmony of spheres.
=====
 

Attachments

  • S. P..jpg
    S. P..jpg
    3.9 KB · Views: 0

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,158
18
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
Doctrine of Creation
===
Creation is a process.
This process can be known by math / physical laws.
But before to know how this process is going, it needs
to know something about reference frame in which
this process is going. because to describe fish it needs
water and to describe animals it needs another
reference frame -- land. The reference frame has
great influence on physical process. Specific
reference frame is the common ground of all specific creations.
#
The creation began from simple to complex,
from micro-particles world to microworld.
Then it needs to know: in which reference
frame the micro-particles can exist.
#
Today we know -- micro-particles exist in CERN / LHC .reference frame.
====
=======
 

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,158
18
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
The language of physics
06/11/19
By Lauren Biron
Word fans, rejoice!
Symmetry is back with another list of 10 common words
that take on a new meaning when spoken by scientists.
Check out the first and second lists,
then take these physics words for a spin, too

https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/the-language-of-physics
===

Spin
It’s easy to imagine a spinning planet, ballerina or
quantum particle because all these objects have
concrete geometrical form.
#
Tunneling
Quantum tunneling is instead a phenomenon in which a particle
can pass through a barrier by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle
#
Quintessence
Scientists use the term ''quintessence'' to discuss the
theoretical idea of an evolving type of dark energy
( Dark energy may be vacuum
https://phys.org/news/2007-01-dark-energy-vacuum.html )
=========
 

Attachments

  • P - L.jpg
    P - L.jpg
    6.1 KB · Views: 0

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,158
18
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
Infinity and Method of Renormalization
#
Renormalization is a collection of mathematical techniques
in quantum field theory, the statistical mechanics of fields,
and the theory of self-similar geometric structures, that are used
to treat infinities arising in calculated quantities by altering values
of quantities to compensate for effects of their self-interactions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renormalization

So, there are infinities in theories and physicists can get rid of them,
(by renormalization ) and so it seems, they shouldn't care about them.
Basically it means:
"Stop trying to understand things; shut up and calculate"
Everyone is free to take this attitude, but it certainly doesn't explain
why physicists encounter infinities in the first place and hence the
renormalization procedure is needed.
#
My opinion:
The concept of ''Infinity'' has concrete physical meaning and
'' method of renormalization '' could be thought as interaction
quantum particles / fields with an infinite structure of zero vacuum ( T=0K)
when all physical parameters of quantum particles renormalized .
==================
 

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,158
18
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
By Chance: Biology - Cosmology
===
Can reasonable child be created from zygote during
270 days of woman’s pregnancy by chance?
Does the theory of probability allow to create reasonable child
during 270 days of woman’s pregnancy by chance?
#
Our human body is a multi-cellular organism made up
of perhaps 100 trillion different cells.
Book: '‘ The unity of Nature'‘
‘'The information content in the nucleus of a single human cell
is comparable to that of a library containing a thousand volumes.'’
/ by Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker, page 40 /
Question:
How can 100 trillion different cells (100 trillion libraries with a
thousand volumes in each) create a child ( by the chance )
during 9 months of woman’s pregnancy ?
#
In my opinion this circumstance is similar to the ''Infinite monkey theorem''
''The infinite monkey theorem states that a monkey hitting keys
at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time
will almost surely type any given text, such as the complete works
of William Shakespeare.''
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem
#
But according to the modern theory of ‘big bang’ the Universe
exist only 14 billion years.
So, monkey's chance to write Shakespeare's Hamlet is zero.
But woman . . . . ?!
A single zygote evolves and develop 100 trillion different cells that
create reasonable child. By chance it is impossible.
It must take time much more than only 270 days of woman’s pregnancy
Maybe it will take time more than 14 billion years.
Then, maybe, before the ‘ big bang’ was a pregnant woman who
gave life to a child who invented the '‘ big- bang '’ theory (?)
======
 

Attachments

  • Question.jpg
    Question.jpg
    5.5 KB · Views: 0

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
By Chance: Biology - Cosmology
===
Can reasonable child be created from zygote during
270 days of woman’s pregnancy by chance?
Does the theory of probability allow to create reasonable child
during 270 days of woman’s pregnancy by chance?
#
Our human body is a multi-cellular organism made up
of perhaps 100 trillion different cells.
Book: '‘ The unity of Nature'‘
‘'The information content in the nucleus of a single human cell
is comparable to that of a library containing a thousand volumes.'’
/ by Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker, page 40 /
Question:
How can 100 trillion different cells (100 trillion libraries with a
thousand volumes in each) create a child ( by the chance )
during 9 months of woman’s pregnancy ?
#
In my opinion this circumstance is similar to the ''Infinite monkey theorem''
''The infinite monkey theorem states that a monkey hitting keys
at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time
will almost surely type any given text, such as the complete works
of William Shakespeare.''
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem
#
But according to the modern theory of ‘big bang’ the Universe
exist only 14 billion years.
So, monkey's chance to write Shakespeare's Hamlet is zero.
But woman . . . . ?!
A single zygote evolves and develop 100 trillion different cells that
create reasonable child. By chance it is impossible.
It must take time much more than only 270 days of woman’s pregnancy
Maybe it will take time more than 14 billion years.
Then, maybe, before the ‘ big bang’ was a pregnant woman who
gave life to a child who invented the '‘ big- bang '’ theory (?)
======
Gettin' religion, sh?
 

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,158
18
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
How to make Theoretical Physics simple
#
To be simple Theoretical Physics needs
a real geometrical form of quantum particle.
It is impossible to take ''point-particle'' or ''string-particle''
as a real image of the quantum particle.
====
 

Attachments

  • E = 1.jpg
    E = 1.jpg
    6.8 KB · Views: 1

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
In 1875, Samuel Tolver Preston calculated the mass-energy equivalence with the equation E = mc2 in his book PHYSICS OF THE ETHER, which is republished in full. He proposed methods of obtaining atomic energy and generating superconductivity.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
When you are under the "bright lights" with your relatives



Everyone ready?
;)
Super! An' a One! An' a Two! An' a Three!


...and you want those butts in those seats to feel the music of the spheres in every cell wall.


Mics by ATO...
 
Last edited:

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
When you are under the "bright lights" with your relatives



Everyone ready?
;)
Super! An' a One! An' a Two! An' a Three!


...and you want those butts in those seats to feel the music of the spheres in every cell wall.


Mics by ATO...
YOU WILL VIBRATE THAT WAY OR YOU W0NT VIBRAIT AT ALL, GO WITH THE FOW OR DON,T GO
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Some rough

spotshopefully the next generation will prevail, these young people will prevail, make no mkstake, I,AM INVESTED IN AND ON THESE LITTLE PRICKS. THE BETTWER HAVE THIER HISORY downn pat, not an option we rule everytime.