9-11 Unmasking the Media Perps

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
Logic, you do realize how ridiculous the whole "hologram" theory sounds?


The whole "hologram theory' sounded ridiculus to me too, until i saw those videos of no plane, Why there is no plane on those videos? there must be an explication.

http://www.eotech-inc.com/holo_history.php


In the early 80's, the perfection and implementation of holographic heads up displays in advance fighter aircraft was proved feasible and successfully deployed. These HUDs were very high quality, reflection holograms and were used for target acquisition, gauge reading, weapon system verification, etc.


2 planes in the back are hologram



Soldier with fog




Swat team using eotech HWS unit






So no, the Hologram theory doesnt ridicoulus at all......
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
What's even scarier is that he has the power of vote. 8O




Well at least guys like me, would and will not vote for bush or harper, would not support war of agression like in iraq and iran, and i would not believe anything that my govenrment tells me, that is something that you should work hard on.
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Well at least guys like me, would and will not vote for bush or harper, would not support war of agression like in iraq and iran, and i would not believe anything that my govenrment tells me, that is something that you should work hard on.

I can't vote for Harper, and I have never voted for Bush, or for the Republican party for that matter.....ever.
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
Fringe Theories Harming 9/11 Truth Movement

Five Years Later Part 1: The obstacles we have overcome, the dangers we face​
The 9/11 truth movement is characterized by an increasingly credible veneer - largely thanks to the 9/11 scholars. As media attention builds to a deafening crescendo in anticipation of the fifth anniversary of the attacks, it is necessary to step back and distance ourselves from the more outlandish 9/11 theories and offset their damaging effects.​
Over the course of the next week we will continue to take a critical and discerning look at the 9/11 truth movement, celebrating both its obvious measured progress while also highlighting areas of concern that need to be resolved before the next rung on the ladder to bringing criminal charges against the guilty parties can be climbed.​
Our sole purpose in this piece is to weed out and discredit an element of 9/11 embraced by 'conspiracy theorists' as oppose to 'skeptics' of the official story. We will treat conspiracy theories that are as implausible or more so than the government version, which in itself a conspiracy theory, with the same contempt - because they are harmful to the 9/11 truth movement as a whole.​
It is not the intention of this article to create in-fighting or bickering nor is it advantageous to attack anyone's character and that is why we refrain from citing any individuals by name. Many speculative tenets of what happened on 9/11 have been courted - including by this author - and then dropped after the evidence evaporates and common sense kicks in. We should be loathe to jettison reason and logic even in times of unparalleled absurdity.​
Advocates of the 'blue screen' or 'hologram' theory hold that the planes that hit the World Trade Center, or at least Flight 175, were ghost aircraft and that sophisticated image projection technology was used to fake the illusion of them entering the towers.​
The evidence they present to validate this notion is the contention that Flight 175 should have "bounced off" the tower yet sliced through it like a knife through butter.​
The vast majority of the evidence is supported not by scientific analysis of what one would expect to happen when a large commercial airliner impacts a skyscraper at over 500 miles per hour, but with grainy Internet videos and hastily interpreted statements made by news reporters at ground zero.​
If we are to believe, and the evidence suggests it to be so, that western intelligence agencies are carrying out acts of terror, to go to such lengths mandates the necessity of multi-layered fallback options if the criminals are caught red-handed. This is why a large scale terror attack is always shadowed by an almost identical government drill, as was the case with 9/11 and the 7/7 bombings. If significant and damning evidence were to be presented in a court of law powerful enough to have any impact that implicated high officials in acts of gross treason - the fallback option that it was "just part of the drill," remains as a last chance saloon.​
If we are to consider that some form of high-tech hologram technology was utilized as part of a David Copperfield style sound and lights magic show that only made it appear as if Flight 175 had hit the south tower - then we are seriously entertaining the notion that the criminals who ran the attack did not bother to construct any fallback explanation if this massive public stunt had gone wrong.​
continued
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Well explain to us, why there is no plane in those video's?


explain, you must have an explanation somewhere........

Explain what you idiot? You have seen the plane fly into the building by hudreds of different angles. The people that were on that plane are DEAD. The people that were working at the impact zone are DEAD. The hijackers on that plane are DEAD.
Not only are you incapable of critical thought, you're completely devoid of common sense.
You'll believe anybody with $20, a domain name and php skills.
Take advantage of your universal health care and seek HELP!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DurkaDurka

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
Logic, even the 911 "Truth Seekers" think the theories you buy into are hair brained. You sound a lot more credible when you blame the attack on Jews & Mosad.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Fringe Theories Harming 9/11 Truth Movement

Five Years Later Part 1: The obstacles we have overcome, the dangers we face

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | September 5 2006


The 9/11 truth movement is characterized by an increasingly credible veneer - largely thanks to the 9/11 scholars. As media attention builds to a deafening crescendo in anticipation of the fifth anniversary of the attacks, it is necessary to step back and distance ourselves from the more outlandish 9/11 theories and offset their damaging effects.


Over the course of the next week we will continue to take a critical and discerning look at the 9/11 truth movement, celebrating both its obvious measured progress while also highlighting areas of concern that need to be resolved before the next rung on the ladder to bringing criminal charges against the guilty parties can be climbed.


Our sole purpose in this piece is to weed out and discredit an element of 9/11 embraced by 'conspiracy theorists' as oppose to 'skeptics' of the official story. We will treat conspiracy theories that are as implausible or more so than the government version, which in itself a conspiracy theory, with the same contempt - because they are harmful to the 9/11 truth movement as a whole.


It is not the intention of this article to create in-fighting or bickering nor is it advantageous to attack anyone's character and that is why we refrain from citing any individuals by name. Many speculative tenets of what happened on 9/11 have been courted - including by this author - and then dropped after the evidence evaporates and common sense kicks in. We should be loathe to jettison reason and logic even in times of unparalleled absurdity.


Advocates of the 'blue screen' or 'hologram' theory hold that the planes that hit the World Trade Center, or at least Flight 175, were ghost aircraft and that sophisticated image projection technology was used to fake the illusion of them entering the towers.


The evidence they present to validate this notion is the contention that Flight 175 should have "bounced off" the tower yet sliced through it like a knife through butter.


The vast majority of the evidence is supported not by scientific analysis of what one would expect to happen when a large commercial airliner impacts a skyscraper at over 500 miles per hour, but with grainy Internet videos and hastily interpreted statements made by news reporters at ground zero.


If we are to believe, and the evidence suggests it to be so, that western intelligence agencies are carrying out acts of terror, to go to such lengths mandates the necessity of multi-layered fallback options if the criminals are caught red-handed. This is why a large scale terror attack is always shadowed by an almost identical government drill, as was the case with 9/11 and the 7/7 bombings. If significant and damning evidence were to be presented in a court of law powerful enough to have any impact that implicated high officials in acts of gross treason - the fallback option that it was "just part of the drill," remains as a last chance saloon.


If we are to consider that some form of high-tech hologram technology was utilized as part of a David Copperfield style sound and lights magic show that only made it appear as if Flight 175 had hit the south tower - then we are seriously entertaining the notion that the criminals who ran the attack did not bother to construct any fallback explanation if this massive public stunt had gone wrong.​

continued
Even the conspiracy hobbiests are battling against each other! :lol:
 

wallyj

just special
May 7, 2006
1,230
21
38
not in Kansas anymore
The head cheerleading conspiracist is alex jones. This waste of skin is now speculating that the gov't may have been behind yesterday's shooting in Virginia. That should tell you all you need to know about this man's credibility. He will exploit any tragedy for his own ends. You are judged by the company you keep. Think about that the next time you use him as a reliable source of information regarding the WTC tragedy.
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
Logic, even the 911 "Truth Seekers" think the theories you buy into are hair brained. You sound a lot more credible when you blame the attack on Jews & Mosad.




I said i've never believed in the Hologram theory, until i saw the videos on youtube, i still don't believe it, but i am very confused of what really happened that day. And the Hologram theory is JUST POSSIBLE, that would explain why there is a white plane following the flew that flew in WTC, that would also explain why on some angle we don't see the plane.
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
I'll gladly pay it. With holographic US dollar bills, made by jews




You are obsessed with the jews, why is that?


have i ever said jews , when i criticized israel or their policy?

Not even a single time.


To answer my own first question, it is because you are a Zionist.