Get real, we have a friend that deals strictly with emissions, smoke, dust, etc. He uses extremely sophisticated and sensitive equipment to determine what is in smoke, dust, air, etc. So I know for a fact taking a color chart and holding it up to a photo or a video is as accurate as a .410 shotgun at 1000 meters.
Stop confusing the issue with facts Anna. I'm trying to get mhz the parrot to do some real research, not just parrot what someone tells her is real.
What else could you say in that the color chart would mean yo have to explain temperatures of 2500 degs. lol
You know DB, in you zeal to be right about something, you oft over look pretty simple realities, like just because I believe in commonsense, science and the realities of steel will and will not do under heat and stress. Doesn't mean I buy the whole story.
Only an idiot would believe the "official story" and I don't believe that story either. However I am also not as idiotic as to toss around all kinds of fanciful "theories" that sometimes conflict with each other.
The fires didn't get any hotter than that, thermite will cause steel to flow like water.
Try looking at the column with the (3)'s in it. It stands for the material did not fail, even at 1300 deg.
What post? What answer? To what questions?
Yup, a lot of other things can, too.
Whoopdedoo for it. Like I said, it's easy to simulate stuff. The movie Avatar is a great example. Now when they build an identical building, put measuring devices all over the place in it, and then have an identical object as a plane fly into it, then we will probably see more realistic results. So far all you seem to do is leap from one idea to another (and some of those are pretty far-fetched) with no cohesion into a realistic theory. It is so easy to poke holes in your posts it is pathetic.
I know who ordered the test. I know who performed it.
Evidence of what? NIST & UL's test? Yeah, it was a fascinating test result, mhz. We're so proud of your C&P.
Perhaps you forgot what the official story even was. lol
