Then why is it questioned, and tons of so called "evidence" being presented?
Oh ... I have questions too - like why did every one of those planes disappear from radar then re-appear without transponder data? That leaves room for another plane to substitute for the original flight. Perhaps it was one of those red herrings designed to get the American public thinking. That makes people doubt and creates divisiveness. Authority hates being questioned.
Well, then I am stupid! But I am not alone... perhaps millions of others around the world don't believe it was done by real hijackers. So much points to the US organized it and then played dumb.
It's hard to ignore an empty piece of real estate. I can't believe anyone could keep a secret that long. Americans (and this isn't intended as a jab) just don't come that well disciplined. Conscience alone would kill the weakest of them, yet we have heard of very few suicides among the halls of power.
They were from Saudi Arabia, but didn't go to that flight school in the States? Why then say they did go to that flight school? What purpose did that lie serve?
Their passports indicate they were Saudi. Were the Mossad who used forged Canadian documents Canadian? Pickpocket, forgery and identity theft are not new trades. The flight school part was most likely another red herring. From experience, I know NOBODY can be that bad and still walk upright.
The flight school part? Planned by whom? and why?
The flight school makes everyone who wants to learn to fly one more person to be watched. If you're overloading yourself watching innocent people, your back's going unwatched for when it happens again.
You mean the system that should have detected the hijacked planes going off course? Or the airlines that didn't screen the Arab hijackers?
I mean a system that was repeatedly warned this attack was going to happen - and just as repeatedly the warnings went unheeded. Air traffic control DID detect the planes going off their respective courses. The reports went ignored - even though Air Defense was made aware this was not part of the exercise. This was real world. Airlines didn't have to screen anyone with dark complexion and a cheesy moustache. Everyone was under the belief it can't happen here.
Oh, they, the US air defense or military brought that plane down? Not the passengers wrestling with the hijackers? I see. They never noticed the other three planes were going off course. So then they managed to bring the last one down, but didn't want to admit they had been sleeping until then?
Flight 93 was still flying a relatively straight course a half hour after FAA ordered all commercial flights to land. That, alone, made it a clear target. I'm convinced it was brought down by A2A. That accounts for engine separation, a debris trail and why the aircraft is reported by witnesses to have gone in inverted and in flames. The Air Force was justified in shooting, considering what had already happened. To reveal 93 was brought down, though, opened the door to questions of why those other planes got through - especially after WTC1 was hit
Stories about the hijackers attending flight school, the air force having a maneuver and that could have distracted the air and flight controllers?
NORAD exercises are standard drill. You can go from drill to real world situations in minutes. That's why you drill. There is always an "on alert" contingent. Denial that ATC reported the situation and the distraction story were good cover-ups for complacency.
What heroes? Giuliano? Ha, he was no hero! The daring and dedicated fire fighters were heroes.
The heroes they created were the passengers who fought back on Flight 93. I can't prove "let's roll" and a fight for control didn't happen, but it's great inspiration to get Americans fired up to avenge them.
Yes, the ones who should have noticed the planes going the wrong way and notify the interception jets. Maybe that was done, but the pilots of those jets were at home or didn't react or thought it wasn't serious.
Them ... and the FBI and CIA people who ignored warnings.
Please, give me examples so I understand clearly what you mean. For instance, what stupidity?
The stupidity is the arrogance in believing your way is the right way for everybody. It's the ignorance that fails to see festering resent among people who want to retain their own pride and not become American copies. It's foreign policies that give and give and give, then expect favour in return. That's not charity.... It's date rape.
Yes, that I can understand. So, real Arab hijackers, well experienced pilots, came over on orders from Bin Laden? Bin Laden was somehow mad at the US, the Americans, for their interference in Afghanistan, Kuweit/Iraq? Is that it? Or for making Israel big and strong?
I don't know if it was Bin Laden or Bin Laden became the face America painted on the bad guy for Hollywood clarity. Israel is only part of the problem. The Arab world detests intruders. Jewish people have always lived among them. Zionist Israel wasn't invited. The Arab world sees America favouring Israel. The Arab (Muslim) world believes Christians still resent losing the Crusades. Presidencies who defer to the rabid Christian right seem to confirm the belief. That all gets to be mixed into the propaganda that extremists use to justify their own righteousness. American "intelligence" missed all that for they don't think in terms of "before the USA existed".
Sorry, Wolf, I haven't participated in those Tower-Discussions and probably missed the theory you have come to. I don't want to stress nor bore you, but perhaps you could in a few sentences explain to me what you recognize as proof it wasn't staged by the US government
Thanks, Wolf
