2016 Presidential Campaign

hillary rodham clinton vs donald john trump who will win?

  • hillary rodham clinton

    Votes: 12 40.0%
  • donald john trump

    Votes: 18 60.0%

  • Total voters
    30

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
59,688
9,230
113
Washington DC
I do the same thing. What I find interesting is that there are certain people I never reply to and yet they keep replying to me thinking they might get a reaction.

This forum is like 90% trolls and but they are really ****ty trolls. Only two people have figured out how to decently troll anyone around here. Walter, whose erratic negative voting is the perfect little annoyance that drives the less stable posters nuts and mentalfloss, who doesn't even need to post to get people angry about him.
There was a time, ma'am, when I woulda been headed for Vancouver just to see if I could meet you. For coffee, for friendship, for a relationship, whatever.

Trying to say you're good people. Thanks for brightening my day.
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
I've always thought that using the 'ignore' feature was a way of saying, "I'm to weak to be able to control myself, so I have to hide anything that might make me want to respond".


If you want to ignore a post, ignore it. Refusing to read it because it might annoy you is pretty pathetic.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
59,688
9,230
113
Washington DC
I've always thought that using the 'ignore' feature was a way of saying, "I'm to weak to be able to control myself, so I have to hide anything that might make me want to respond".


If you want to ignore a post, ignore it. Refusing to read it because it might annoy you is pretty pathetic.
You too. We got crossways sometimes, like folk will. Never lost respect for you.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
 

Nick Danger

Council Member
Jul 21, 2013
1,804
471
83
Penticton, BC
I've always thought that using the 'ignore' feature was a way of saying, "I'm to weak to be able to control myself, so I have to hide anything that might make me want to respond".
If you want to ignore a post, ignore it. Refusing to read it because it might annoy you is pretty pathetic.

Just to be clear, in the slightly more than three years I've been coming here, a total of three people have earned a place on my ignore list, and they worked pretty hard at it. None of them seem to spend any more time here. I chose to ignore them because they never had anything relevant to offer and they was no reason to expect that to change. Say what you like, but if someone is an obvious waste of bandwidth then fukkem. There are enough posters here that are genuinely interesting that there is little time to invest in no-minds.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,395
8,020
113
B.C.
Yup. One thing they need to be liberated from is the culture of victim blaming you're perpetuating.
Yup lets stop teaching women that they actually can grow up to be president of the U.S. of A. .

There was a time, ma'am, when I woulda been headed for Vancouver just to see if I could meet you. For coffee, for friendship, for a relationship, whatever.

Trying to say you're good people. Thanks for brightening my day.
Would you come down to Fraser Freds for a pint while you are here ?

I've always thought that using the 'ignore' feature was a way of saying, "I'm to weak to be able to control myself, so I have to hide anything that might make me want to respond".


If you want to ignore a post, ignore it. Refusing to read it because it might annoy you is pretty pathetic.
Well some people post long rambling roses , it is easy to get bored by the end .