Which one?This obsession needs to be classified as a mental illness.
LMAO.
Just because you put quotation marks around something doesn't mean that either of us actually said it.
Oxford caliber debate tactics this one has. LOL
Shush now, he's making an important point.!
Maybe this is why he thinks he wins all the time. He's basing on imaginary arguments he has.
That's really kind of sad, don't you think.
LOL...Seems you missed the whole point. I simply was pointing out where the human aversion to breeding with close relatives came from and why we have mostly stopped.
And back when the human race was young, there were no contraceptives.
In fact, still today, good practicing Catholics are still forbidden to use them
By the time we get the homophobes, and the religious ones sorted, we will have pillaged the earth so badly, we will be extinct..
Nobody is holding a gun to your head to have heterosexual relationships, so why get your knickers in a knot about what others do.
If a relationship is consensual and they are of age, it is none of your business.
By the way, all animal species, swing both ways.
Of course they are more enlightened than the human species, they not only tolerate them but use them in a multitude of ways, depending on the species.
I think we all know what you're thinking.
....about someone else.Too right I am. I've made a very GOOD point, and I've left you and your little mate as rattled as a Canadian sprinter.
It's always easy when you make up the arguments of your opponents. A bit more difficult when you have to have a rebuttal for the things they actually said.I won this argument a long time ago. My victory was so easy, complete and assured that I'm actually bored now.
Manking has no such aversion in such great quantities. Neither does mankind.What about the human aversion to having sex with members of the same gender? The vast majority of manking is averse to that.
Just because you'd rather have sex with your brother or sister doesn't mean everyone would. Stop projecting your fantasies on others. In case it's escaped your notice, folks around here are rarely in agreement with you.In fact, I'd wager more people would rather have sex with their brother or sister than they would with a member of the same sex as them.
Are these more of those imaginary people that you win arguments with?What about those bigots and anti-unprogressives who are against sibling sex?
Again, only your imaginary friends are getting their knickers in a knot. No real people are getting bent out of shape over anything you're saying.It's not me getting my knickers in a knot about what others do. It's you and your mates who are doing that. You are getting all hot and bothered because I'm proposing that if gay sex is allowed then so should siblinfg sex.
Again with the imaginary people! Seriously, a doctor can probably prescribe something for this.Isn't that what I've been arguing? If a consenting brother and sister want to have consensual sex, what the hell does that have to do with you? It's none of your business. And yet you and your little mates seem so against it. Again, you're practising the very hypocrisy I'm talking about - that it's okay for two men or two women to have a sexual relationship with each other if they love each other and are both consensual adults, yet you seem to find something wrong with a brother and sister having sex with each other if they are both consenting adults.
Tell you what, you go ahead and bang your sister to your heart's content and we'll ignore you. And in return you can keep your nose out of other people's sex lives as well.
Let's face it S.L.M. this guy is just totally depraved. We are certainly having our luck with the "winners" the past while.
Ha!
I have no delusions of actually being able to 'get through to him', trust me on that. Still I think it's important to point out that all his 'wins' are against imaginary opponents.....we shouldn't be enabling his delusions after all. Lol.
You really, really don't.
Where did I say I want sex with my brother or sister? I'm just saying that sibling sex should be outlawed. If gay sex is allowed, why not sibling sex? What harm does it do? I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of the pro-gay mob - i.e. you and your little mates - who get on their high horses telling everybody that what consenting adults get up to in their own bedrooms is nothing to do with us and should be fully legalised, but then when you point out that, if that's the case, then sibling sex should also be allowed they then suddenly change their tune and call anyone who supports sibling sex "depraved". But if anyone finds gay sex depraved they are "bigots".Just because you'd rather have sex with your brother or sister doesn't mean everyone would. Stop projecting your fantasies on others. In case it's escaped your notice, folks around here are rarely in agreement with you.
I think everyone replying to my good, intelligent comments on this thread are getting bent out of shape over what I'm saying. I know you are.Again, only your imaginary friends are getting their knickers in a knot. No real people are getting bent out of shape over anything you're saying.
The thing is, you can't go round accusing somebody who supports the idea of legalising sibling sex if gay sex is also legal as themselves having sex with their siblings. How would you like it if someone said that anyone who supports homosexuality is themselves a homosexual? If I said: "That guy over there supports homosexuality. He obviously likes going round shagging guys" you would call me a raging homophobe. Yet you yourself are doing the exact same thing.Tell you what, you go ahead and bang your sister to your heart's content and we'll ignore you. And in return you can keep your nose out of other people's sex lives as well.
Like I said before, I don't care, I'm not a Neanderthal.The thing is, you can't go round accusing somebody who supports the idea of legalising sibling sex as themselves having sex with their siblings. How would you like it if someone said that anyone who supports homosexuality is themselves a homosexual?
Let's face it S.L.M. this guy is just totally depraved. We are certainly having our luck with the "winners" the past while.
Like I said before, I don't care, I'm not a Neanderthal.
You are free to bed your adult brother.
My bad, now I remember, it was your adult sister you wanted to bed, and some gay person said no.I don't want to bed my adult brother. I'm not gay for a start.
My bad, now I remember, it was your adult sister you wanted to bed, and some gay person said no.
Gotchya.
Oxford English Dictionary
Depraved (adj): A term used by a pro-gay rights person to describe a person who points out the hypocrisy and double standards of the pro-gay rights crowd, who tell us all that we should be "tolerant" and "supportive" of homosexuality and gay sex because "what consenting adults get up to in their own homes has nothing to do with us and does us no harm" but who then reel in disgust and horror when it's pointed out to them that, if that's the case, then sibling sex should also be legalised between consenting adults.
Where did I say I want sex with my brother or sister? I'm just saying that sibling sex should be outlawed. If gay sex is allowed, why not sibling sex? What harm does it do? I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of the pro-gay mob - i.e. you and your little mates - who get on their high horses telling everybody that what consenting adults get up to in their own bedrooms is nothing to do with us and should be fully legalised, but then when you point out that, if that's the case, then sibling sex should also be allowed they then suddenly change their tune and call anyone who supports sibling sex "depraved". But if anyone finds gay sex depraved they are "bigots".
You were telling us how you and her use condoms so you don't have kids.Using the warped logic that you're using, anyone who's supportive of homosexuality goes round shagging people of the same gender as them.
You were telling us how you and her use condoms so you don't have kids.
Yes you did. Must be that UK education system.No, I didn't.
No one here has said anything against consenting related adults having sex. Except you.
Yes you did. Must be that UK education system.
I win.