16% of Britons believe gay sex should be ‘outlawed’ – survey

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,956
1,910
113
LMAO.

Just because you put quotation marks around something doesn't mean that either of us actually said it.

Oxford caliber debate tactics this one has. LOL


I think we all know what you're thinking.

Shush now, he's making an important point.!

Too right I am. I've made a very GOOD point, and I've left you and your little mate as rattled as a Canadian sprinter.


Maybe this is why he thinks he wins all the time. He's basing on imaginary arguments he has.

That's really kind of sad, don't you think.

I won this argument a long time ago. My victory was so easy, complete and assured that I'm actually bored now.

LOL...Seems you missed the whole point. I simply was pointing out where the human aversion to breeding with close relatives came from and why we have mostly stopped.

What about the human aversion to having sex with members of the same gender? The vast majority of manking is averse to that. In fact, I'd wager more people would rather have sex with their brother or sister than they would with a member of the same sex as them.

And back when the human race was young, there were no contraceptives.

There are now.

In fact, still today, good practicing Catholics are still forbidden to use them

You're using the argument that sibling sex shouldn't be allowed because some people, such as Catholics, don't use contraceptives and therefore a brother and sister shagging each other could give birth to a div baby.

But I can easily make the argument that we shouldn't allow gay sex, for the exact same reason. We all know the dangers of aids, and that two men having sex with each other without contraceptives is a VERY bad idea, because it increases the risk of contracting aids. Some people say that two men should never have sex with each other without the use of a condom. But, as you point out, Catholics don't use condoms. So gay sex should not be allowed because of this reason. It's dangerous.


By the time we get the homophobes, and the religious ones sorted, we will have pillaged the earth so badly, we will be extinct..

What about those bigots and anti-unprogressives who are against sibling sex?


Nobody is holding a gun to your head to have heterosexual relationships, so why get your knickers in a knot about what others do.

It's not me getting my knickers in a knot about what others do. It's you and your mates who are doing that. You are getting all hot and bothered because I'm proposing that if gay sex is allowed then so should siblinfg sex.


If a relationship is consensual and they are of age, it is none of your business.

Isn't that what I've been arguing? If a consenting brother and sister want to have consensual sex, what the hell does that have to do with you? It's none of your business. And yet you and your little mates seem so against it. Again, you're practising the very hypocrisy I'm talking about - that it's okay for two men or two women to have a sexual relationship with each other if they love each other and are both consensual adults, yet you seem to find something wrong with a brother and sister having sex with each other if they are both consenting adults.


By the way, all animal species, swing both ways.

No, they don't.


Of course they are more enlightened than the human species, they not only tolerate them but use them in a multitude of ways, depending on the species.

So because some animals have homosexual tendencies then that means that humans should, too? Some animals eat each other. Does that mean that humans should?
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
I think we all know what you're thinking.

You really, really don't. If you did you'd actually react to things I said to or about you instead of....

Too right I am. I've made a very GOOD point, and I've left you and your little mate as rattled as a Canadian sprinter.
....about someone else.

I won this argument a long time ago. My victory was so easy, complete and assured that I'm actually bored now.
It's always easy when you make up the arguments of your opponents. A bit more difficult when you have to have a rebuttal for the things they actually said.

What about the human aversion to having sex with members of the same gender? The vast majority of manking is averse to that.
Manking has no such aversion in such great quantities. Neither does mankind.

In fact, I'd wager more people would rather have sex with their brother or sister than they would with a member of the same sex as them.
Just because you'd rather have sex with your brother or sister doesn't mean everyone would. Stop projecting your fantasies on others. In case it's escaped your notice, folks around here are rarely in agreement with you.


What about those bigots and anti-unprogressives who are against sibling sex?
Are these more of those imaginary people that you win arguments with?


It's not me getting my knickers in a knot about what others do. It's you and your mates who are doing that. You are getting all hot and bothered because I'm proposing that if gay sex is allowed then so should siblinfg sex.
Again, only your imaginary friends are getting their knickers in a knot. No real people are getting bent out of shape over anything you're saying.

Isn't that what I've been arguing? If a consenting brother and sister want to have consensual sex, what the hell does that have to do with you? It's none of your business. And yet you and your little mates seem so against it. Again, you're practising the very hypocrisy I'm talking about - that it's okay for two men or two women to have a sexual relationship with each other if they love each other and are both consensual adults, yet you seem to find something wrong with a brother and sister having sex with each other if they are both consenting adults.
Again with the imaginary people! Seriously, a doctor can probably prescribe something for this.


Tell you what, you go ahead and bang your sister to your heart's content and we'll ignore you. And in return you can keep your nose out of other people's sex lives as well.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Tell you what, you go ahead and bang your sister to your heart's content and we'll ignore you. And in return you can keep your nose out of other people's sex lives as well.


Let's face it S.L.M. this guy is just totally depraved. We are certainly having our luck with the "winners" the past while.
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
Let's face it S.L.M. this guy is just totally depraved. We are certainly having our luck with the "winners" the past while.

Ha!

I have no delusions of actually being able to 'get through to him', trust me on that. Still I think it's important to point out that all his 'wins' are against imaginary opponents.....we shouldn't be enabling his delusions after all. Lol.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Ha!

I have no delusions of actually being able to 'get through to him', trust me on that. Still I think it's important to point out that all his 'wins' are against imaginary opponents.....we shouldn't be enabling his delusions after all. Lol.


Nope- they walk among us!
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,956
1,910
113
You really, really don't.

I do. I really, really do.

Just because you'd rather have sex with your brother or sister doesn't mean everyone would. Stop projecting your fantasies on others. In case it's escaped your notice, folks around here are rarely in agreement with you.
Where did I say I want sex with my brother or sister? I'm just saying that sibling sex should be outlawed. If gay sex is allowed, why not sibling sex? What harm does it do? I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of the pro-gay mob - i.e. you and your little mates - who get on their high horses telling everybody that what consenting adults get up to in their own bedrooms is nothing to do with us and should be fully legalised, but then when you point out that, if that's the case, then sibling sex should also be allowed they then suddenly change their tune and call anyone who supports sibling sex "depraved". But if anyone finds gay sex depraved they are "bigots".

Again, only your imaginary friends are getting their knickers in a knot. No real people are getting bent out of shape over anything you're saying.
I think everyone replying to my good, intelligent comments on this thread are getting bent out of shape over what I'm saying. I know you are.


Tell you what, you go ahead and bang your sister to your heart's content and we'll ignore you. And in return you can keep your nose out of other people's sex lives as well.
The thing is, you can't go round accusing somebody who supports the idea of legalising sibling sex if gay sex is also legal as themselves having sex with their siblings. How would you like it if someone said that anyone who supports homosexuality is themselves a homosexual? If I said: "That guy over there supports homosexuality. He obviously likes going round shagging guys" you would call me a raging homophobe. Yet you yourself are doing the exact same thing.
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
Blackleaf, just calm down and revisit your post and use the quote function correctly. It's important that you effectively differentiate between what I've written and what you've written, because that post has you coming across as more schizophrenic than usual.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
The thing is, you can't go round accusing somebody who supports the idea of legalising sibling sex as themselves having sex with their siblings. How would you like it if someone said that anyone who supports homosexuality is themselves a homosexual?
Like I said before, I don't care, I'm not a Neanderthal.

You are free to bed your adult brother.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,956
1,910
113
Let's face it S.L.M. this guy is just totally depraved. We are certainly having our luck with the "winners" the past while.

Oxford English Dictionary

Depraved (adj): A term used by a pro-gay rights person to describe a person who points out the hypocrisy and double standards of the pro-gay rights crowd, who tell us all that we should be "tolerant" and "supportive" of homosexuality and gay sex because "what consenting adults get up to in their own homes has nothing to do with us and does us no harm" but who then reel in disgust and horror when it's pointed out to them that, if that's the case, then sibling sex should also be legalised between consenting adults.

Why should two men be able to shag each other but not brother and sister?

Like I said before, I don't care, I'm not a Neanderthal.

You are free to bed your adult brother.

I don't want to bed my adult brother. I'm not gay for a start.

You're supportive of homosexuality. Do you go round bedding other blokes?
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,956
1,910
113
My bad, now I remember, it was your adult sister you wanted to bed, and some gay person said no.

Gotchya.

Point out where I said I wanted to shag my sister.

Using the warped logic that you're using, anyone who's supportive of homosexuality goes round shagging people of the same gender as them.
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
Oxford English Dictionary

Depraved (adj): A term used by a pro-gay rights person to describe a person who points out the hypocrisy and double standards of the pro-gay rights crowd, who tell us all that we should be "tolerant" and "supportive" of homosexuality and gay sex because "what consenting adults get up to in their own homes has nothing to do with us and does us no harm" but who then reel in disgust and horror when it's pointed out to them that, if that's the case, then sibling sex should also be legalised between consenting adults.

Who in the hell are all these reeling people??? I mean, can you see them right now?
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
Where did I say I want sex with my brother or sister? I'm just saying that sibling sex should be outlawed. If gay sex is allowed, why not sibling sex? What harm does it do? I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of the pro-gay mob - i.e. you and your little mates - who get on their high horses telling everybody that what consenting adults get up to in their own bedrooms is nothing to do with us and should be fully legalised, but then when you point out that, if that's the case, then sibling sex should also be allowed they then suddenly change their tune and call anyone who supports sibling sex "depraved". But if anyone finds gay sex depraved they are "bigots".

No one here has said anything against consenting related adults having sex. Except you.
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
No one here has said anything against consenting related adults having sex. Except you.

Pssst, I think he's imagining things. Also, he appears to be quite sensitive about too, just between you and I. ;)

Yes you did. Must be that UK education system.

I win.

It's easy to win the Blackleaf way! All you have to do is make up the things that people are saying and that you're arguing against and voila! Instant success!