Search results

To be honest, if it were pelosi herself then fine, that's a big deal, but her husband being a complete dink really doesn't seem to be much of a story. Unless he holds public office his bad behavior isn't relevant to her doing her job. It's like when the papers try to get the public worked up...

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will watch the watchmen? An age old problem. the so called 'fact checking" orgs have proven to be pretty useless and incredibly bias. So that's not a solution. Honestly i think that the only real solution is to be much better at teaching people how to assess...

So a slave was considered to be a person based on your definition? BTW - your use of the word liar pretty much proves you know you're wrong. You can't discredit the argument so you resort to dishonesty about my intentions. Ahh well, nobody expects better from those who form their opinon on...

Ok - so why? If that's your position you need to make an argument. You can't expect people to just accept that any more than others could expect you to just accept "a fetus is a human from the moment of fertilization! End of story". You seem to be suggesting that it's the "breathing" part that...

Wow. So women aren't recognized as people in any of the US laws? I think you'll have a tough time defending that, i'm pretty sure at least SOME women own property somewhere :) But you said that it was the LAW and only the LAW that determined who was a person :) You must realize how pathetic...

That was the word used in the laws in question. As usual, you have no rational thoughts, just attacks. A fine example of left wing thinking today :)

What an absolute disaster. This is what happens when a 'party' isn't really a party but rather is just a cult of personality. There was no 'green' party, there was just the 'elizabeth may' party and when she left there was literally nothing there. Just a bunch of squabbling children. Ah well...

https://www.cp24.com/news/canada-to-create-team-to-counter-russian-disinformation-trudeau-1.6038465 Well at least he didn't call it a war room This will probably end well, and won't be abused by calling EVERYTHING 'russian disinformation' that they don't like.

LOL - so women weren't people before the law recognized them? How very sexist of you! :) So - if the law was changed to say that an egg is a person that would be an accurate thing and you would support that 100 percent as being legitimate? As we can see the law is mutable and therefore not an...

ROFLMAO - i'm afraid it's not me who misunderstands :) Utterly irrelevant. This isn't a discussion about what rights are. We all agree that humans have the right not to get murdered. That's not in dispute. This is a discussion about what a human is, and when it starts :) Sorry but that was an...

No, because of what people believe they're telling someone not to abuse children. Or kill them. So it has more to do with people telling others to respect other people's rights. Yes. They will have to convince others of that argument and make their case though if it's going to be granted legal...

And how are you defining person? (LOL - maybe you should think ahead :) )

I thought you claimed you worked in intelligence. In fact the law very commonly requires that if an organization or power has behaved towards a person one way historically in the past that this is how they should be treating people now. That's pretty normal. And lets just address the logic...

Full rights and legal status of what?

yeah that was a pretty rational argument :) Did you want to try that again? :) Obviously at some point it goes from being an unfertilized egg to having to figure out how to pay it's student debts. Somewhere in between those two points it becomes a human being and rights attach. Insulting the...

Well then fair enough, you can call trump out on this and that's entirely fair. I"m not happy with either either. (wait - either of them either... damn english is stupid) Ohhhh - you think they talked about the case? Because they swear that they didn't. But even you obviously believe they...

I get what you're saying but you're coming at it from the wrong perspective. It has nothing to do with telling someone what to do. The people who believe in denying abortions believe the thing inside the woman is a child. IF that is TRUE - then it's got nothing to do with the woman's rights and...

Irrelevant in this case.

Codswallop. That's just blatantly untrue by any sane definition of the word for the exact reasons mentioned. I did. I suppose there are SOME differences - Ivana didn't run across the runway to have a secret meeting with the AG yet :) But both were in posession of documents they shouldn't have...

Yep. They did. Well trump did at any rate, the republican party had moved past it. Looks like that is going to work for him in the end. For sure. I mean lets get real, it would be a startling circumstance if he DIDN'T lie :) But - that just means his case and hers is even more similar. She...