Search results

The obvious reason china is opening it's borders up is that they're hoping it spreads again so they don't look so bad for having so many cases. Duh :)

#REPORT: Randall McKenzie, the 25-year-old suspect allegedly involved in the fatal shooting of Const. Pierzchala, was already hit with gun charges in 2021 but was released on bail. So basically our new policy is to lock up guns but let the criminal out. That worked out pretty well didn't it...

So your first claim is that there is no normal, followed by this is normal, ending with an admission you don't know what normal is. Very convincing :) Sorry but this is not normal. But - feel free to stick your head in the sand and humm if it makes you feel better.

Oh god, don't get them started....

When was that exactly? Not in the recorded history of the lower mainland for example - so when was that precisely? As i've explained, it wasn't really about the cold per se. However taking that one point this year did in fact break records for cold in many areas, and so did 2021. But it's...

Sorry it just isn't. I mean sure it might very well be in some cases, but when a building that's been there for 20 years has a problem that it's never experienced before that has nothing to do with wear and tear, you can't really blow that off as just 'bad engineering'. And certainly not...

This is the problem. When the gov't gets to decide when a thing is or is not a 'threat', rather than the law spelling it out, then everything the public does is a the whim of the gov't, instead of the other way around.

Ahhh, no. The size of the population does not have any impact on whether or not there's freezing rain or snow. It doesn't change the temperature. And you would only NEED "upgrades" if something had changed. So what you're saying is something has changed. Sorry, this is new. And it's new in a...

Entirely new. Buildings which have been standing for 20 years are running into this kind of thing for the first time. But hey - don't let facts or truth slow you down. You do you. :)

ROFLMAO - suuure kiddo. :)

If the inquiry comes back with a more strongly worded report saying he misused it or used it without lawful reason then there will be at least some blowback, and against the NDP as well to a degree. I mean nobody's going to rise up and throw him out of power or anything but it will be used...

https://www.cp24.com/news/opp-officer-killed-in-shooting-near-hagersville-ont-2-suspects-in-custody-1.6209781 What the hell is wrong with people these days.

Well there's that :) But believe it or not a lot of this 'flooding' is happening in higher places and on sloped roofs and the like. And in places where there's normally more than adequate drainage but with these conditions the drains just aren't working. And going from 12 below to 10 above...

Yeah, it is. I was just talking to the contractors and insurance company about it. the last 2 years especially have been brutally bad for that. And ice rain was all but unheard of in the lower mainland until the last few years. It's completely different and frankly most of the buildings here...

Well he sure hasn't given the money back or to ukraine has he :)

That's actually been part of the problem in the lower mainland - it went from snowing and brutally low temps to freezing rain then rocketed up to relatively warm weather and heavy rain overnight - now everthing got clogged with ice and flooded with water and snow melt. The restoration companies...

It's been a trick of gov'ts going back to ceaser's day - kill a few rich guys and steal their assets and wealth to fund your wars. Not much of a surprise.

Basically. The number of slip and fall claims has gone up something like 200 percent in the last couple of years in the lower mainland alone. And remember - the bad guys often don't file right away. They legally have 2 years to file legal action and they'll wait till a month or so before that...

Yeah, but honestly the problem in the end is going to be the report. He said it and it echos something i said here a while back, that the report will most likely be "mistakes were made, they acted in what they believed were the best interests, not the letter of the law but the spirit, etc etc'...

It really depends on how the bylaw is written it's not the same everywhere. IF it says "homeowner must clear sidewalk within 24 hours of a snowfall", and he did clear the sidewalk, then he's in compliance. It doesn't say "within 24 hours of a jackass depositing it back" after all. But - it's...