Search results

http://medlibrary.org/medwiki/Urban_heat_island_effect

One could say the same thing to you and be at least as correct. I do the same with your brother, SJP. He tends to ignore posts containing science that contradicts his pet hypotheses, too. lmao I haven't felt a thing so far. lol And what about your inability to read? You've been shown that UHI is...

lol Cute. The solution there would be to convince the conservative that it could be a great opportunity to try out new weapons. And the first one should be used to calm the panicky liberal down a bit.

lol. So far, we've had volcanoes, solar flares, polar shift, UHI, electricity (darkbeaver's pet) used as excuses for global warming and flatout denial of human involvement. Even the scientist in the video about GCRs showed that GCRs would be a minor forcing agent (if it's found that they have...

Yup. I mentioned that in post #234. It was conveniently ignored, though. But this'll be ignored, too.

So this Prall guy is right up there with the lead denier, Icke?

I do? News to me. Yeah, you are. I sympathise. BTW, I don't care what you expect. roflmao That's one of the worst spins I've seen in a long time. Sorry, but my point was that Pet and you (mostly because you probably haven't a clue about UHI and Pet appears to be "on your side") seem to be...

It's pretty interesting, alright. But, this is only one factor of forcing. There are more, obviously. I did a little digging (it's something I seem willing to do that you aren't, morgan) and found this pdf and lecture explaining the pdf: pdf...

That would make sense if urbanity covered most of the globe. But it doesn't. Between 1 and 2% of the globe is urban. About the same as having a basket with 2 lemons in it and 4 dozen apples and calling the average mostly yellow. Keep wondering. Then quit being a snivelling hypocrite. Yeah, you...

It's obvious. But considering the fact that temp measurements are also taken from areas other than urban areas, there are no urban areas sitting on the oceans (about 73% of the surface), not all land is covered by urban areas, and humans only occupy between 1 and 2 % of the surface and not all...

Exactly. It also indicates that claims about fudging can go both ways. You're the one that was snivelling about name-calling, Mr. Pot. You were whining that Tonington called you a name and then you turn around and do the exact same thing. If you can't understand hypocrisy, you're not as smart as...

And you think you do? roflmao You made the claim, back it up. What's the real data then? Hopw much is different from that and the published results? You won't post it, though, will you, because it'll show there isn't that much difference. Back up your claim or stuff it. And you accuse Tonington...

You're just annoyed because I showed how thorough you can't be and how much assumption you base on your impression of your thoroughness (or lack of it). :D Anyway, so in actuality, how much fraud has been proven and documented? And how much of this fraud varies how much from the real data? You...

I read that. I know WTC 7 collapsed and I never believed the conspiracy version that says stuff like "controlled demo caused it". But that link does not say how "falling debris" from the towers managed to land waaaay over on WTC7. The fires that caused WTC 7's collapse must have come from somewhere.

Pretty much. People love to turn their pet thoughts into full-blown religions. I'm inclined to agree with Dexter. The amount of people that would have to be involved in the conspiracy would show the idea of a conspiracy to be a logical improbability. That does not mean the official story is...

Go pout then. *shrugs*

Why didn't WTC 5 and/or 6 fall down or burn down? WTC 7 was not hit by a plane. The official story is that it burnt down after being hit by debris. The story behind the construction of WTC 7 is that it was impossible to burn down and the debris that got there, if any, was not sufficient to do...

So your interest wasn't really in finding out what the gov't said, you wanted to know what I would say about what the gov't said about WTC 7? Why not just say that in the first place? Otherwise you could google the info just as well as I can.

WTC 7 - Google Search

Have you seen its explanation as to why WTC7 fell down?