Search results

So a few cases where vaccines are shown to be detrimental to a few cases means all vaccines are bad for all people, right, Stretch? :tard:

You've not quite described the issue accurately. First off it was denial that the globe was warming. Now after a few years, their denial has weakened and they claim the globe may be warming but humans aren't involved. I figure a couple decades after there's definitive proof we have a hand in...

Well, according to them they are. lol

Ignorance and faith that scientists haven't a clue what they're talking about. lol.

Crock. The links are from newsmedia who do not include any of the research that the people they quoted published. Alarmist? lol That's a laugh. The only people they might alarm is those ecotards you keep babbling about. Really? Then why did you insist that those "research papers" never said...

No, there isn't in those short little excerpts. I agree. Dead wrong. Blatant proof you didn't even read the links in the blog. Dead wrong. The fact is that those links are from mainstream newsmedia and a blog. And that comment is glaring proof that you haven't a clue what was in Walter's link...

looks like a nice fridge, Juan. Ron, don't be so lazy and crouch a little sometime. I have the same problem. You could always set the fridge on a small table, too. Elevator shoes for fridges. :D JLM, tin is like iron, magnetic. :)

Simply put, the iron content (the element succeptible to magnetism) is very low in stainless steel. So you need more powerful magnets to hang on6to the small amount of iron in the steel.

Who would that be? Only if they ignored the evidence. lol Good way to put it. For one thing, it's a blog. The blogger cannot comprehend that no-one is saying everywhere warms more than everywhere except him. If one actually paid attention to those things he cited, one would realize that those...

In SA or Antarctica? Or did they merge? ;)

Sad. 65 is too young. Sad. Too many people don't "get it" ("it" being the message).

lol Well, technically it is FEMA's explanation but FEMA was under Junior Dumbya & Co.'s admin at the time.

:) Ok. Maybe I can find something else to throw doubt on Junior Dumbya & Co.'s explanation then.

Yeah I know. It'd be nice if there was a vid of it though. Downward velocity does not pitch stuff horizontally. I can't see it rolling far after most of 1 was in a heap either. Unless the plane knocked a big wad of it off when it hit.......

Fire would be my guess. from interFIRE, A site dedicated to improving fire investigation worldwide. Here's some persistent heat for you: THISDAYonline But I think New Scientist provides a pretty good description...

Really. I had no doubt. Unfortunately, I was referring to your comment about wading in before you know what you are talking about. But, another bad spin on your part. Sorry. It isn't "my science". It is just science. Just because I link to it does not make it mine. Not that you'd recognize good...

Oh, I see what you're getting at. Sheeesh I got lost here: http://web.mit.edu/raffaele/www/Publications_files/RudnickFerrariScience99.pdf And we should be proud to do what we can to contribute to their escalation. :( But it was a really cool June here so I think NOAA is off its rocker.

Miniaturized and able to play satellite tunes even. lol

JAXA? Japan's aerospace exploration bunch? The ice on what planet is melting? They looking at Mars? Venus? Or are they looking from space to Japan and seeing how much of Japan's ice is melting?

It's fertilizer. And you are saying that it enters seawater and causes any NaCL in seawater to bond with carbon and that leaves chlorine, bromine, fluorine, or iodine to wander about freely? And?