Search results

Hiatus. NASA isn't denying. Why would you?

With my wang, I would be too but I still want him to mother several sphincter babies for me regardless of fear.

I love you waldo.

Because the 97% lie was shot down months ago by yours truly and gerryh being the smart fella he is understands how and why the lie was created and is still being spread.

That's fine but remember, we don't live in an empty jar.

Does that mean you won't be my Facebook friend? The AGW cup of bullsh-t is full. I can agree with that?

That was Zen, this is Tao. Does 33% make a path to consensus? Nice huh?

I had him pegged from day one. There is no way in hell a creep gets my respect.

Yeah gerryh, you just don't know what consensus is. Drywaldo knows things we don't.

The point missed appears to be that 33% doesn't make a consensus. Does 33% make a consensus to you? Yes or no? I'm still waiting for him to admit he lied. This new definition of consensus has been submitted to the Oxford Dictionary?

Ignore and lie? Ever considered getting a job? A job as a used car salesman.

Why won't he debate me? Thanks neighbourg.

Right right right. Anecdotal trumps reality every time. No it doesn't. Lying to yourself is pathetic.

Insane/feral/jib rat people who chose to not do their meds or won't quit sucking the glass cock piss me off. Can you see it drywaldo?

Abstract We analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, examining 11 944 climate abstracts from 1991–2011 matching the topics 'global climate change' or 'global warming'. We find that 66.4% of abstracts...

He is lying again and it will be your fault he lied and you called a liar. ¿?¿?

97% of 33% who wrote AGW paper and were polled and asked if they still believe their papers to be true. What happened to change the minds of 3%?

¿¿¿¿¿

It's not dead, it's just on an 18 year hiatus (and counting).

....