Search results

Rising. And all of the proposed legislation is the same, banning "books that make kids feel bad on account of race." Obviously they mean "White kids," but I'm sure you'll deny that, blissfully ignoring the fact that all of the books mentioned by name make the same general claim: that racism...

What happens at Woodstock. . .

Provincial and Federal justice officials should offer to meet with any local group. Senior cops too. They should listen a lot, and their message should be "Protest all you like. Do not break the law. It will be enforced on you just like FN protesters, environmental protesters, or just people...

There's also a lot of "True Dope shoulda," but it is a delicate balance, what the PM should intervene in, and what the PM should leave to lower-level and local authority. I don't recollect Trump, nor the Attorney General, nor any other Federal official (nor any state official) offering to meet...

One of the many fine members of the Wa-Na-Be people.

Apparently not in the 14 states (and counting) that are banning books.

Only a hopeless optimist. Anybody who had their eyes open in 1970 could see it coming clear as a Canadian truck. That it took until the 21st century was surprising.

Don't be so sure. If they can make Elizabeth Warren a Native. . .

Well, the racists'll do everything in their power to stop it evolving. Like banning books.

Judge orders protesters to end blockade of Ambassador Bridge; Ontario premier declares state of emergency, threatens fines, prison time Story Turn the Detroit PD loose on 'em.

"In 1836 a small group of settlers, misinterpreting a passage from the bible, set out from Pennsylvania." --Kent Brockman, "The Founding of Springfield," The Simpsons

Ya really, REALLY can't fix stupid.

It was one or two lone assholes. It ain't hard to miss a Nazi or Klan group, cuz they'll make damn sure you know they're there.

Hey. . . maybe he could cosplay as a trucker!

From the American point of view, I tend to prefer the Canadian Conservatives as more beneficial to our interests. I know, that is and should be a secondary concern for y'all. But a significant one, given the ties.

You're right. It ended in 1865 or 1886 or 1954 or 1964 or 1966 or 1968 or 1976 or 2008.

Sure it wasn't a brown shirt?

It would be beneath his Prime Ministerial dignity to sit on the table. He did say "on the table."

About bloody time!

Bullshit. They had co-morbidities.