Search results

Well, first there are people mitigating (or at least attempting to mitgate it) and secondly, a drastic reduction in human population is a bad thing (asking from a global perspective)?

Wherever they want, would be my guess.

Some are. Just as some deniers are. http://library.thinkquest.org/C008537/cool/freeze/freeze.html

You forgot the topic? No it's not. Much of the ice loss? I agree Glaciers are picking up speed into the ocean. The ocean is warmer. Surface ice may be melting but not at the rate of old ice. The old ice is darker because of particulates that absorb energy but the water that result from surface...

Ya think? Really? I thought we were talking about ice disappearance from frost-free fridges. :rolleyes: Try again. Most of Greenland's ice is disappearing from below, just like as in the Antarctic. Again, you keep insisting upon things about me that I have shown are untrue. I am not anti-AGW...

Yeah, and cracking dumb one-liners like those is good reason to take you durps seriously? lol

lmao you post this ridiculous link again after I've shown why it's fulla nuts? rofl

lol You just keep that impression if it makes your bum hum. [/B]Ya think? I learned that decades ago. Part of your problem seems to be thinking you need to repeat the blatantly obvious over and over again. I told you, I guess you didn't understand. Again; my point is that it is not just the pole...

I read it. Apparently you haven't been keeping current with any information about Antarctic ice loss and prefer hanging onto possibly spurious opinion. The problem with your hyposthesis is that you seem to think no-one can look deeper than those dramatic and emotional terms except yourself...

Bull ****. In 2009 they had little idea of how much ice was disappearing from the Antarctic simply because they didn't see it. Why they didn't is because it is melting from below the surface. http://nsidc.org/news/press/20110725_iceshelf.html...

****, you're dense. The point was "This summer may see first ice-free North Pole". I suggested that I don't think ice will totally disappear even though it is disappearing in massive amounts all over the north. I didn't miss the point; you only deluded yourself into thinking I did. Your depth...

hm Good catch, Ton. lol

Yep. Sometimes regions' climates vary from the norm. Back then I don't think there were such terms as "La Ninas" and "El Ninos" and stuff. Just terms like "weird winter", "weird summer", etc.

And there are many ways, geological evidence, biological evidence, etc. lol Maybe something to do with temp. deviation? Just a guess. :D

roflmao Still didn't understand the post I made, I see. Boy, talk about thousands of feet thick. lmao Quoting myself: "Well, I wouldn't predict a complete loss of ice but there's certainly a huge amount disappearing from places like this" (and I included a couple links). I suppose to clarify a...

Yeah, diminishing ice in the north has little to do with diminishing ice in the north. :rolleyes: Um, you do know that a large chunk of Greenland is in the Arctic don't you? And ice loss is ice loss? Here's a map for ya, pilgrim:

It was an example of diminishing ice. You really had a problem understanding my post? wow

Yeah, but then you have trouble dealing with evidence, fact, and reality so your oppinion is pretty bulemic.

With all due respect to Lindzen, he's been shown to be wrong about a few things. But he is right about some of the crap that flies around the issue of AGW. And if you claim AGW is a hoax, you should be able to at least provide evidence for the claim, But I know you can't and won't. Yep. Just...

aawww Po lil gerry got his panties in a knot cuz Coldslime mentioned religion and invited retorts. Hugs po lil Gerry.