Search results

Uhuh. You forgot to post your source. Don't want to be caught stealing someone else's research. :) Arctic sea ice enters the spring melt season « Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis Here's some stuff, too: Arctic sea ice loss unprecedented in 1,450 years - Technology & Science - CBC News Ice...

Uhuh. Now you might notice that the temperature scale hit peaks and then goes down. Except for the past little bit. It is still hanging around at higher temps for a longer period of time. That breaks the trend shown in your graph over the past 450,000 years. And it shows no sign of going down...

yes. However, you mentioned Greenland so I posted some info about it. And it isn't as if Greenland is the only place ice is disappearing from. It's disappearing all over the planet. That weather phrnomenon contributes to and indicates issues in global climate trends. Record_Lows_2001...

You asked, "Can you quantify through modelling?". Again, you did not specify anything in particular, let alone specify that you wanted quantifiable facts. You got what you asked for. Bullshyte. Do you claim AGW is BS? If so, post something supporting your claim.

Prove me wrong then. You wanted an example and didn't specify any particular example. As far as climate models go, they can provide quantifiable indications and trends. If data supports their predictions then they are decent models. If you don't think so, that's your problem. You haven't yet...

Operational risk. Who cares about the IPCC? You are the one that brought it up so why should I have to supply info about it? grow up and find it yourself.. BTW, got anything supporting your denial?

Depends upon what you want to quantify.

Prove anything related to the topic. Direct observations are quantifiable. Got anything to support your dumbass denial?

Prove it. Science magazines are science journals, idiot. They publish papers and conclusions that contain data and assessments. Got anything to back yourself up? I thought not.

Got anything to support your denials? I can even come up with arguments against global warming. Apparently, you can't, though. Prove it, don't just claim it.

lmao It's been shown to be an observation backed up by data clooected directly and indirectly. That's all the stuff you ignore, so why are you concerned about it now? Anything to back up your denials? Pick a link in the URL, you lazy moron.

A database of peer-reviewed papers on climate change Do you have anything refuting global warming? Nope. I didn't think so.

More opinion? lol No reason, especially since the planet is still warming. :)

Uhuh. So? Did you see any post of mine claiming that groups are peer-reviewed? IPCC is a group, BTW. Research papers are peer-reviewed. research papers are authored by 1 or a few researchers. research papers are peer-reviewed before being published in journals. That means the work done by...

Greenland? lol 2010 spike in Greenland ice loss lifted bedrock, GPS reveals http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate1449.html Various estimates of Greenland ice loss That last one shows variability in Greenland's ice loss, but the fact still remains no-one is...

Not my problem if you haven't a clue how to look. Doesn't matter, idiot. I never claimed anything about 2035 either way. lol And you sure spew it aplenty.

lol Local seasonal weather has what to do with global climate?

Nope. You aren't citing anything. Just spewing your goofy little opinion. lmao Who said? You? I have no doubt that there are credible scientists who contribute info to those groups. I posted a link. So that indicates you didn't even bother looking. And that proves my point that it doesn't matter...

Here`s another one: Myles Allen, head of the Climate Dynamics group at University of Oxford's Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics Department. Lead author, IPCC Third Assessment Report. Review editor, Fourth Assessment Report. Richard Alley (1957- ), American, Earth's cryosphere and...

Now you can post something that supports your dumbass opinion. :)