Search results

lol Again, Professor, no-one had a clue about that either until you pointed it out. Which is the SOP for a nation built upon (or converted to) a plutocratic and oligarchic corporatocracy (as well as dictatorships and other forms). Choice is taboo. Ya think? And that happens even in places that...

lol Reminds me of a joke I heard: Newfie is sitting on the end of the pier fishing and singin "I's the bie that sails th' boat, I's the bie that sails 'er" when a ufo lands nearby and an ET emerges. ET sees Newfie fishing and singin. ET unholsters his raygun and blasts the Newfie...

I know a dozen or so that won't; starting with wifey, our daughters, wifey's sister, her Mum, a few friends, etc. lol

North Pole? Penguins? uhoh, Looks like they are mixing invasive species problems with global warming. Unless perhaps they're accounting for polar reversal, which might confuse the birds into migrating.

I didn't say that. I said speak for yourself. My donation to global climate change is extremely small. Even smaller than it was last year.

Speak for yourself, pilgrim.

lol Um, jeeez, professor ..... really? We had no idea. Like I said, we don't live in a democracy; we live in an oligarchic and corporatocratic plutarchy. Decent credo, but that's only my SOP or methodology. And where do lobbyists and private interests have their interests? Mainly in business...

I kinda thought so, too. lol Uh, jeeez professor ..... uhuh I have a sort of a credo: expect the worst and hope for the best. No disappointments that way. Nah, that stuff is just by-products of business. Expect the worst ....... Since when do we live in a democracy? I'm pretty sure that we live...

Not necessary. We're killing off a large part of the population indirectly anyway. People being what we are, that won't happen. Nope. No swindles involved. It's just straight business for profit.

After you, professor.

That's helpful. Uh, yeah. That's what I mentioned alright. Based upon observation. If glaciers keep issuing ice into the oceans and it doesn't disappear as soon as it hits the ocean, it's obviously going to start floating around. Mostly? That's your argument - mostly? Really? Doesn't look like...

Uh, yeah. I realized that a couple decades ago. lmao

lol That sounds like a personal problem. I, on the other hand, prefer seeing the good part of people. hhmm Something occurred to me about people and arrogance just now. I've noticed that Dex has admitted to being wrong on occasion. How many other "arrogant" people can do that?

Yes, it is and I've seen nothing to shake the opinion either.

lol Hardly, but he is pretty bright and knowledgeable.

lmao Yeah, I got a reddie for my comment, too. "brilliantly cogent argument"? You're being too kind in your sarcasm, IMO.

He is trying to say that sea levels aren't any different than they have been. IOW, the world is still flat to him. http://sealevel.climatecentral.org/ http://sealevel.colorado.edu/ Cool. I just found this. One can compare the effects with existing maps: http://flood.firetree.net/

I am pretty sure he's missing some things that would alter he's amended opinion. Ah, so you are against the idea of climate change simply because some people are still polluting? wowAre you against people doing stuff against diabetes because a few others aren't doing stuff about it, too?

Why is it "poppy-caulk"? Try supporting your claim with substantial evidence rather than opinion for a change. I'd much rather trust Dexter's opinion of climactic matters and how he views them than yours simply because he can provide reasons why he has an opinion and you rarely do.

Pretty much, Dex.