Search results

http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/ipcc-principles/ipcc-principles-appendix-a.pdf

Are you seriously going to bring in anecdotal evidence as an admissible argument now?

Youtube Science

Well, clearly what your saying is complete bullcrap. In view of the ongoing public and political debates about climate change, the aim of this document is to summarise the current scientific evidence on climate change and its drivers. It lays out clearly where the science is well established...

Nope. Parroting him or gore is naive.

Really good back and forth that puts into perspective both sides on a wide spectrum of issues. I've been checking out all of these electoral debates, but this one seemed to have the most appropriate representation of each party's reason d'etre. C-SPAN Video Player - Tonight's Campaign...

He doesn't mention anything to discredit AGW. It was mostly complaining of about the bureaucracy of the American Physical Society. He was upset that his view wasn't being put forth so he tried to get a petition going for open discussion. That failed, and so now he's wagging his tail and using...

I'll miss you too morgan. *sniff*

It's sad to see Morgan has nothing left but ad hominems like 'youtube' and now 'sidekick'. I guess if you can live with misrepresenting facts and lying to people on a daily basis, the truth eventually kicks you back in the face and you have nothing left but whine and cheese. It's okay buddy...

Huh. Well, I guess that puts this one to bed, lol. I'm not sure why you have such an agenda against this. The fact that you are stooping so low not only to misrepresent this document, but also feign the inability to read is beyond me. Seriously, how much are they paying you to continue...

Do you have a link to that? That should seal the deal on who to really trust on these forums. Ah, never mind.. found it: http://royalsociety.org/climate-change-summary-of-science/ Yea, so I can't really trust you morgan, if you're going to deliberately spread lies like this.

Where were you last week when I had ribs?? ;) This looks really appetizing. I'll be giving it a shot next week.

Guess who's ba-aaack. Bin Laden uses Pakistani floods to drum up support - Yahoo! News

Rick Sanchez: Jon Stewart Is A Bigot And CNN Is Run By Jews

And here he comes.....

Staunchly atheist, yet openly racist. A rare breed!

Some scientist. He completely blew the equation. It's not pV = RT, it's pV = nRT, and that's a pretty important variable. He's called out by actual high school students here: How to calm the climate science confidence crisis - Capital Weather Gang Hans' "scientific theory" is parroting the...

You wanna hug it out? Anyway, what exactly are you proposing? And why don't you give specifics that back up what you are proposing? And make sure they are logically coherent and don't have holes. That would be a start. Oh, and lastly, if you really wanna hug it out you can.

I dunno. Why don't we have a thread about it and find out?