Search results

Rhetoric. If you want to prove something, prove it. Develop a case that has an introduction with well documented examples and a successful conclusion. Until you do that, your words are pretty meaningless.

Here is a graph comparison of types of aviation forcing and their degree of importance: --

Well it depends on the degree with which condensation affects the environment vs. carbon emissions. I don't think we really know enough yet to determine the exact extent of this type of forcing yet, but I personally think it would still be a distant second to carbon emissions. That isn't to...

Okay. But contrails is still an anthropogenic cause. So I'm still confused as to what your point is??

Hi Petros. Just want to interject here and peacefully enter this discussion on contrails. I'm not sure I follow what you're saying. Do you mean to say that man-made contrails are not having affect on global warming or that their effect is overstated by the IPCC?

Well do some research. Half the problem is making a decision without knowing why. It's the same close-minded mentality that deniers use that keeps them ignorant. There are scientifically credible studies out there that make a good case for our involvement. And these same studies take the...

It's funny how you can get so many people to agree to something when they don't even question why or how to come to that conclusion. I guess all it takes is a physics professor to make off-hand comments without actually referring to any scientific debate to get the ignorant to sign away. That...

Basically Cliffy, either go build a treehouse or don't bother making any contribution to the environment. It's a textbook strawman.

You see morgan, this is what people normally call rhetoric. In this thread you will find actual material from that report that we've posted that doesn't imply any pseudo-psychic luke-warm bath position of support. Your problem is apparently forgetting any snippets, not acknowledging them and...

If you go back a page, you'll see that you haven't been negative rated for any of your posts so I have no idea what you're talking about. If you want to whine any further about this then send a PM instead of diverting. As it stands you still haven't validated your phony interpretation of the...

Begging to be spared as usual. I didn't negative rate any of your posts for this so I have no idea what you're talking about. You're the one going on a negative rating rampage. I personally couldn't care less about my rating. My posts can stand on their own merits, unlike your worthless...

Well of course it wouldn't if all you post is cartoons to fuel an ad hominem attack. As for the countless teachers and professionals who use it daily for educational purposes - why don't you preach that to them and see if you make any headway. So, what was that point you were trying to make...

Yes, since I actually have a history of posting pro bono information, while you don't, lol. Now the amnesia is kicking in.

Good. Now if you replaced all of your 'thoughtful' posts with that one word, we would save a lot of time and cyberspace. In the meantime, you can work on reading comprehension and get back to digesting that report again. :)

No, it only required the same level of thought put into your posts. Which is apparently very little. I could have embellished on your amnesia, reading incomprehension, or ad hominem agenda, but any casual reader would already know you suffer from those.

Rhetoric.

holy crepes batman!

Neither. They are both completely independent thinkers, free from the thought control of our totalitarian government. You can tell by how convincingly they reveal the UN/IPCC/Obama socialist plot for world domination.

Shush Batman. I'm supposed to be Robin.

Petros Methodology for Retrieving Facts Step#1: Insult the other person Step#2: Ask them to provide rational discourse