Search results

True. It's actually five in five. Ya just gotta pick the right five.

Why? Are standard-issue WASPish Canadians obligated to "step up to denounce" dishonest or criminal standard-issue WASPish Canadians? And can any WASPish Canadian who fails or declines to do so be regarded as "just as bad?" Exactly where does one go to get on record as opposing Paul Bernardo...

Oh dear. I don't suppose we could convince you to spare us another round of your retarded insults?

Nor what you do with yours.

I wouldn't touch her with your dick.

Yep, like "military intelligence" or "Parlimentary action." Or "honest cop."

That makes sense. She is, after all, married to you. . .

Remember the pix of him and young Ivanka? Creepy. He did say he'd like to date her. And we know what "date" means to that sort.

It would depend on the basis of the "dismissal." The term implies the charges were dismissed without trial. Usually (but not always) that leaves the door open to new charges in the future. The "double jeopardy" or "once in jeopardy" rule was established back when there were far, far fewer...

No, the other guy won.

So. . . the principle is if anybody but your guy wins, the election was rigged?

How did you know that, just out of boredom?

The testicles of last game's losers. When the Shemanese came, we had to adapt the game and use really tiny sticks.

Yeah, I kinda figured you for a natural-rubber sorta guy.

So, perfection is impossible? Even for Allah?

Always good to hear from an experienced practitioner.

Well, first we'll have to get you to understand that not all Federal employees are border guards. . . nah, forget it.

I used the belly-fat test, "if you can pinch more than an inch." Just not on their bellies, ya dig?

OK, I'll admit they're usually pretty crass, but a lot of them are just trying to quietly live their lives. . . Of course, kinda by definition, only the show-aways get in the paper.

Roop'll tell ya probably best not to accuse Dominion.