Search results

It's pretty telling how this whole topic is drowned out by crickets when real issues like a Global Pandemic and Police brutality and such are in the news, and this whole topic fades to the obscure in the face of real issues....

I've been tied up for several days, but whenever I hear any news that isn't about COVID 19....it's about "George Floyd." There are riots in at least nine different US cities over this murder and CNN is going 24/7 on this....& I can't find (so far) anything about it here on the Forum.

3 meters is between 9' & 10' (9'10" & a whisker) & jives with the elevation map above that says 10'. I'm assuming it's in the yellow zone (flood danger) due to storm surges. I'm not saying that storm surges are getting worse or better, but simply that they are a thing that exists that would...

Nearest I can find, some sources say 9 feet above sea level and others say 10’.

I concur with your assessment of the situation and that it appears that this particular individual “did not drink the koolaide” but did hedge his bet with the change to Federal legislation with respect to flood insurance rates. This is Barack Obama’s new digs. Weird situation...

I've no idea, but I think they paid $15,000,000.00 USD for this place recently. Luckily back in 2014 the US legislated in a flood insurance relief bill signed in by then President Obama to prevent sharp premium hikes after an overhaul of the government’s flood insurance program in 2012...

OK. Cool. If Tuckernut Island and Martha's Vineyard are being slowly swallowed by the sea (and not also experiencing isostatic rebound to compensate for that like it appears the map pictures posted yeasterday are showing if sea levels are rising), then buying real estate at or just above sea...

IF the global Climate is warming and IF the sea level is raising due to melting ice, what explains Nantucket? Rebounding? Glacial Rebounding 12,000 years after the beginning of this inter-glacial period?

Damn text to talk... Both a blessing and a curse. As butchered As the predictive text above is, i’m assuming you can understand the gist of things?

Much like Florida being fat 12,000 years ago compared to today, nantucket is fat today compared to the nautical chart from 1857. It’s interesting. Makes one think. That’s what I was pointing out just in pictures and I’m sorry for the confusion. Something interesting is going on there. What do...

Sorry, I just assumed it was obvious. About 12,000 years ago before the current interglacial. Some of the water currently in the oceans was tied up in large masses of ice on the continents and thus the lowered sea level being approximately 400 feet lower than it is currently & thus fat Florida...

Ok. Cool. The two global maps above, the first one is from about 12000 years ago before the current interglacial period with lower sea levels, & the second global map is of present day with higher sea levels during this current interglacial period, so these cherry picked pic’s actually support...

Please expand upon this "Sea levels" statement.

So....to understand why the medieval warming period was warmer than today's climate on average, we need to study the recently constructed artwork off the coast of Cozumel and liquefaction caused by an earthquake in Jamaica in the 1700's?

I've no idea. What was driving the Medieval Warming Period? Perhaps history is repeating itself in some cyclical manner?

It was past my bedtime.

Did it say the Greenland ice is increasing or decreasing since 2014?

National Geographic is probably fake news or something though....& this was just the first hit....& I didn't even open the link.

LINK: http://business.financialpost.com/news/economy/were-very-cautious-not-to-screw-it-up-all-eyes-on-saskatchewan-as-business-plan-to-re-open...