2SLGBTQQIA+

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
115,754
13,707
113
Low Earth Orbit
It's FOR THE CHILDREN! Just like your excuse for your hatred of LGBTQ people.
Is there an anti-fruitcake vaccine?

I don't hate LGBTQ2S Ltd. 100% supportive. I just don't validate the delusional who deserve mental health treatment not enabling the very same way I'd never call an anorexic fat or in need of a gastric bypass to satiate their delusion.
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,723
2,684
113
New Brunswick


Mary Jo Podgurski

oepSnosrtd82 a0271c8a 5g9ac0448t4 5:trfM2cltt1a8MhahA ui02m9 ·
I receive interesting calls.
A very upset parent called to complain to me - evidently, her school was teaching her child "pronouns". She was appalled. She asked me to do an Ask Mary Jo column on what she called "gender ideology".
I did what I always do when someone calls me with a question for the column. I listen and try to assess the problem. There's often a 'question behind the question'.
I also try very hard to not judge.
In this case, the parent was upset because she was certain her child's teacher was "trying to make my daughter trans".
I asked which pronouns the teacher taught.
The parent was confused by my question. "Those trans pronouns" she said.
I asked her if she knew any pronouns. She told me with certainty that they did not use pronouns "in our house."
I then gently explained the definition of a pronoun. And a noun. And a verb.
I asked if the teacher had taught these parts of speech as well. The parent was suddenly silent. I explained that pronouns stand in for a noun, as in he, she, you, me, I, we, us, this, them, and that.
She blurted, "I feel foolish. I didn't understand."
We had a lovely conversation about misunderstanding (which we all do) and pre-judging (which hopefully we try to avoid).
She then asked me about gender. Surprised, I took a deep breath and told her I would be happy to share what I knew. I also shared that I spoke from my heart, and from nearly 5 decades of experience (I met my first gender-fluid child at Children's Hospital in 1972; we also cared for children with Turner Syndrome, Kleinfelter's Syndrome, ambiguous genitalia and adrenogenital syndrome. I worked on the Clinical Studies unit as an RN). She was interested. She had many questions. I explained all those chromosomal differences in humans.
When I finished explaining she had more questions. She asked about trans kids. I talked about how few truly trans kids exist, and how challenging gender dysphoria can be, and how young people do not become gender non-conforming or trans because they hear about pronouns. I shared how a study as recent as 2022 showed that 82% of transgender individuals have considered killing themselves and 40% have attempted suicide, not because of their gender but because they feel ostracized....and how other studies show how much the presence of only one caring adult can improve a gender non-conforming young person's mental health....
She said she'd never heard any of that.
I told her that, ultimately, I believe each young person is worthy of respect. She very softly said, "That's a good thing to believe."
She added, "There's a lot I don't understand." I told her I was still learning at 75 and that there was a lot I didn't understand, but I read as much as I can. She asked if we could chat again if she had other things that confused her and I said, "of course."
I thanked her for her respect and for asking.
I thanked her for listening with an open heart.
I assured her there are professionals who have studied pediatric endocrinology who know how to best support these young people, so she didn't need to do so, but she should try to respect each person's worth. She agreed.
We spoke nearly an hour.
She asked how she could donate to our Teen Center, and said she wanted me to share our conversation, "not in your column, but some place where people like me can read and learn."
I'm doing so now.
My papa said we have a chance to reach each person's heart every time we encounter someone. He taught me to lead with love and kindness.
The final thing she said to me was, "I think I'll go watch Schoolhouse Rock!" We both laughed.
Is it possible to connect with those who are adamantly misinformed about something? Not always. I've failed many times.
But I keep on trying.
#EachPersonIsAPersonofWorth includes those who are misinformed.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
115,754
13,707
113
Low Earth Orbit
Toddler kicked out of nursery school for being transphobic: 'This is totalitarian insanity'

A British toddler was kicked out of a nursery school after being accused of being transphobic or homophobic, according to local media reports.

The child, aged 3 or 4, was kicked out of an unnamed school nursery "for being transphobic," the Telegraph reported Monday.

The name of the school and details of the case were not disclosed by the Department for Education (DfE) of the United Kingdom, the report said.

A DfE spokesman told the newspaper that "all pupils and staff should feel safe and protected at school and should never face violence or abuse."

Statistics revealed that 94 students at state primary schools were suspended or permanently excluded for transphobia and homophobia in 2022-23.

That figure includes 10 students from year one and three from year two, where the maximum age is seven, the report states.

"Every once in a while, the extremes of gender ideology throw up a story that seems too crazy to believe, and a toddler being suspended from nursery for so-called transphobia or homophobia is one such example," Helen Joyce, director of advocacy at Sex Matters, told the newspaper.

"Teachers and school leaders involved in this insanity should be ashamed of themselves for projecting adult concepts and beliefs onto such young children," she added.
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,723
2,684
113
New Brunswick

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,248
3,409
113
Prosecutors seek 7 years in prison for disgraced ex-U.S. Rep. George Santos in federal fraud case
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Philip Marcelo
Published Apr 04, 2025 • 3 minute read

NEW YORK — Prosecutors are seeking more than seven years in prison for disgraced former congressman George Santos after he pleaded guilty to federal fraud and identity theft charges.


The U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York argued in a court filing Friday that a significant sentence was warranted because the New York Republican’s “unparalleled crimes” had “made a mockery” of the country’s election system.

“He lied to his campaign staff, his supporters, his putative employer and congressional colleagues, and the American public,” the office wrote. “From his creation of a wholly fictitious biography to his callous theft of money from elderly and impaired donors, Santos’s unrestrained greed and voracious appetite for fame enabled him to exploit the very system by which we select our representatives.”

The office also argued that Santos had been “unrepentant and defiant” for years, dismissing the prosecution as a “witch hunt” and refusing to resign from Congress as his web of lies was debunked.


Even after pleading guilty before trial, prosecutors argued his claims of remorse “ring hollow,” noting that he has not forfeited any of his ill-gotten gains or repaid any of his victims.

“The volume of Santos’s lies and his extraordinary pattern of dishonesty speaks to his high likelihood of reoffending and the concomitant need to remove him from the community he has repeatedly victimized,” prosecutors wrote.

The 87-month sentence proposed by prosecutors represents the high end of court guidelines in such cases. That would be roughly four to five years behind bars plus a mandatory minimum two-year sentence for aggravated identity theft, they said.

Santos’ lawyers didn’t immediately respond to an email seeking comment Friday, which was the deadline for both sides to submit their sentencing memos to court.

A federal judge on Long Island is scheduled to hear arguments and decide on Santos’ sentence during a court hearing on April 25.


The once-rising Republican, who represented parts of Queens and Long Island, served barely a year in office before he was ousted by his House colleagues in 2023 — just the sixth congressperson ever expelled in the chamber’s history.

Santos’ political demise came after it was revealed that he had fabricated much of his life story, leading to questions about how the political unknown had funded his winning campaign.

The now-36-year-old cast himself as a wealthy businessman who had graduated from top colleges, worked at prestigious Wall Street firms and held a valuable real estate portfolio. In truth, he was struggling financially and faced eviction.

Santos admitted in August that he duped voters, deceived donors and stole the identities of nearly a dozen people, including his own family members, to make donations to his congressional campaign.


He was initially due to be sentenced in February, but a judge granted him a three-month reprieve to come up with more than half a million dollars in court fines.

As part of his plea deal, Santos agreed to pay nearly $375,000 in restitution and $205,000 in forfeiture.

Santos’ lawyers said at the time that he had little more than $1,000 in liquid assets and needed more time to build his newly launched podcast “Pants on Fire” in order to begin paying off the debt.

Prosecutors maintain Santos profited handsomely from his infamy, arguing he has earned more than $800,000 from appearances on the video-sharing website Cameo and from a new documentary since his expulsion from Congress.

Two of Santos’ campaign staffers have also pleaded guilty to federal charges in connection to the campaign financing scheme.

Sam Miele, his former campaign fundraiser, was sentenced in March to one year and one day in federal prison. He admitted to impersonating a high-ranking congressional aide and charging donors’ credit cards without authorization while raising campaign cash for Santos.

Nancy Marks, Santos’ former campaign treasurer, admitted she submitted to federal regulators bogus campaign finance reports filled with fake donors and even a fake $500,000 personal loan from Santos himself.

The embellishments helped Santos hit campaign fundraising thresholds needed to qualify for financial backing from the national Republican Party.

Marks is due to be sentenced in May.