I tried to p.m. you, but it can't be done, so I thank you here, appreciate your kind words.Your view/take on this subject is the best explanation that I have yet to see and I wholly agree with it. I applaud you.
M.
I tried to p.m. you, but it can't be done, so I thank you here, appreciate your kind words.Your view/take on this subject is the best explanation that I have yet to see and I wholly agree with it. I applaud you.
M.
Wait. You must be confused. You said it is your mistake but then it is my mistake.L Gilbert
Sorry ,my mistake ;I have not compleated the sentence...It should have bin....
"They sure live longer ;but at the same time,they still don,t know 'why they live'.
As you can see I was not questioning the length of the life but the reason for the life itself .But you have not noticed that LG , and that's your mistake .
The animals that Noah took with him in his Ark, were those useful to people, and he together with his sons and the believers with him, will need after that deluge would have exterminated all the animals and men in that certain country: Iraq.
So he took with him, according to God's instruction and revelation, one pair of sheep, goat, cow, camel, horse, donkey, hen, duck and so on.
It does not mean that he took a pair of all the animals [like the snake and the wild beasts] existing on earth, and that will be impossible.Of course it is impossible. And you cannot get the DNA of the wild animals from the ones we have domesticated. So the whole story of Noah and the flood is either extremely exaggerated or else complete BS in the first place.
Moreover, the Hebrew Bible [most of which is included in the Old Testament] available now is not dependable.ANY Bible I have seen so far is not a dependable source of info. So?Specially so is the Book of Genesis which was not revealed to Moses; but the Children of Israel inherited it from Prophet Abraham and may be before him.
The present Hebrew Bible is actually the Torah of Ezra, that he wrote for them after their return from the captivity of Babylon; and it included much distortion, additions and subtractions and he omitted many things originally were written in the original Torah of God.
http://quranandhebrewbible.t35.com/#The_Torah_[or_Hebrew_Bible]_of_Ezra_
Uhuh. So says these books. Unfortunately, these books all have the credibility of flying pigs.The deluge of Noah
When God sends an apostle; the purpose is to convey to them the message that God is One without associate or equal.
The good-doers and the kind-hearted will follow him, according to God's guidance;
The wrong-doers will not believe: God will not guide them.
Then the apostle will be victorious in one of two ways:
>> Either his people will believe in God alone and follow their apostle –– and they will prosper,
>> Or they will remain sticking to their traditions, their idolatry and association with God and will disobey their apostle –– and in such case they will be exterminated by many ways:
- A deluge will drown them ---- like what happened to the people of Noah.
- An earthquake will overtake them ---- like what happened to the people of Lot and many other peoples.
- The storms and hurricanes will destroy them ---- like what happened to the people of Aad tribe near Yemen.
- Or their enemy will attack them and annihilate them ---- like what happened to Jews in Palestine when they denied Jesus and the three disciples or apostles after him (see the Book of the Acts of the Apostles).
Therefore, the deluge of Noah was a punishment for his people, who disbelieved and stuck to their association and idolatry; because they were wrongdoers.
The deluge included one country as a whole where the people of Noah were dwelling; it had nothing to do with all the Globe of the Earth.
Uhuh. So says these books. Unfortunately, these books all have the credibility of flying pigs.
And you cannot get the DNA of the wild animals from the ones we have domesticated. So the whole story of Noah and the flood is either extremely exaggerated or else complete BS in the first place.[/font][/size][/font][/left]
It is not like that: many wild animals lived elsewhere outside this country of Noah; the flood included one country as a whole, not the whole earth.
The story of the deluge is correct, as the excavations indicate where they found layers of alluvium extending on a wide area, underwhich some towns were found.
So? As I said, the tale is either extremely exaggerated or simply BS. You claim it is exaggerated.And you cannot get the DNA of the wild animals from the ones we have domesticated. So the whole story of Noah and the flood is either extremely exaggerated or else complete BS in the first place.[/font][/size][/font][/left]
It is not like that: many wild animals lived elsewhere outside this country of Noah; the flood included one country as a whole, not the whole earth.
The story of the deluge is correct, as the excavations indicate where they found layers of alluvium extending on a wide area, underwhich some towns were found.
BTW, there's a town near here that is underwater still. It's called Needles and it wasn't submerged by any gods or demons or poltergeists or even the giant at the top of the beanstalk.
The best reply to this is in the Quran...
Prove it. Show the evidence of what you said is fact and save your cut & pastes from your book of fantasy. Just show us the scientific evidence.
SCott Free
tc...
They sure live longer ;but at the same time,they still don,t know why .
I can't see any way to understand that except as meaning that I don't believe in god because he hasn't given me leave to do so, it wasn't my choice, it was his, and according to you he's going to condemn me to hellfire for eternity for something he's done to me. His decision, but somehow I'm responsible for its consequences. I can't take that seriously at all, it deserves a good loud Bronx cheer too. I don't understand why you can't see how incoherent your position is.It is not for any soul to believe save by God's leave.
rofflmfao Why in the world would I be afraid of a product of someone's imagination or some book written about that product? Sorry but your silly little book is no better or worse that that other silly little book called the Bible.I have read some of your cut & pastes and none of it has any basis in fact, only hearsay, and an awful lot of it is just plain scientifically ridiculous. I hardly think I am in any danger of reading something that silly and being converted by it. get a grip. Things of faith are only important to me in that I like poking holes in their suppositions, hypotheses, and dogma. My life is doing just fine without believing in fantasies like gods n other such faerie tales.The Quran is not a book of fantasy; have you read it carefully and tried to understand what treasures and jewels it includes? Dare you read and investigate it deeply?
Your insisting refusal and denyal implies it is only a psychological self-defence against the possibility of the Quran of God influence you, and you are afraid lest you should then convert!
But be sure this is only up to God alone, as in the Quran 10: 100
وَمَا كَانَ لِنَفْسٍ أَن تُؤْمِنَ إِلاَّ بِإِذْنِ اللّهِ
The explanation:
(It is not for any soul to believe save by God's leave.)
Here you go again, displaying your incredible ignorance of fact. The fact is that prehistoric man lived an average of about 18 years, ancient greece - about 20 years, middle ages in England - 33, early 1600s USA - 35, etc. and todays average life expectancy is about 78. THOSE are documented facts. So if you don't think people live any longer now than a few thousand years ago, or even a few hundred years ago, I have a suggestion for you: keep your nose away from bags of glue.Or essentially, who said they even live longer !
The life-span is according to God's decree.
This is in the Quran 17: 99
أَوَلَمْ يَرَوْاْ أَنَّ اللّهَ الَّذِي خَلَقَ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالأَرْضَ قَادِرٌ عَلَى أَن يَخْلُقَ مِثْلَهُمْ وَجَعَلَ لَهُمْ أَجَلاً لاَّ رَيْبَ فِيهِ فَأَبَى الظَّالِمُونَ إَلاَّ كُفُورًا
The explanation:
(Have they not seen that God Who created the heavens and the earth is Able to create the like of them;
moreover He has appointed for them a term, of which there is no doubt;
yet the wrong-doers refuse anything but to disbelieve.)
That is because God does not guide the wrong-doers.
I can't see any way to understand that except as meaning that I don't believe in god because he hasn't given me leave to do so, it wasn't my choice, it was his, and according to you he's going to condemn me to hellfire for eternity for something he's done to me. His decision, but somehow I'm responsible for its consequences. I can't take that seriously at all, it deserves a good loud Bronx cheer too. I don't understand why you can't see how incoherent your position is.
Here you go again, displaying your incredible ignorance of fact. The fact is that prehistoric man lived an average of about 18 years, ancient greece - about 20 years, middle ages in England - 33, early 1600s USA - 35, etc. and todays average life expectancy is about 78. THOSE are documented facts. So if you don't think people live any longer now than a few thousand years ago, or even a few hundred years ago, I have a suggestion for you: keep your nose away from bags of glue.
I fear and love God without reservation. The great unknown inspires both fear and love as the two are indivisable.
DB you are better than many of the Arab, many of Muslims, many of Christians and Jews.:smile:
But I whisper in your ear: Unless man admit that God is One without associate or equal, and believes in all the apostles (including Mohammed), and believes in all the heavenly books (including the Quran); or else he will lose in the Hereafter [so I have said it to you and others.]
this supposedly omnipotent, omniscient god created humans to his own design, which given his characteristics must be the best possible design in this best of all possible worlds, knowing it was flawed and knowing full well what all the consequences would be, and now he's prepared to hold us responsible and condemn us forever for those flaws.
Job is recorded in the Old Testament as asking essentially the same question, and the answer he got amounted to "I can do whatever I want and you just have to take it."
The best reply to that is that great American invention, the Bronx cheer.